Childbirth Education and Support During Labour: Association with Birth Satisfaction

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie-Psychological Science and Education Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.17759/pse.2023280206
A.D. Suarez, L.A. Shraibman, V.A. Yakupova
{"title":"Childbirth Education and Support During Labour: Association with Birth Satisfaction","authors":"A.D. Suarez, L.A. Shraibman, V.A. Yakupova","doi":"10.17759/pse.2023280206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of antenatal education and individual labour support in the context of the actual experience of childbirth and its psychological perception. Types of antenatal education and individual labour support were analysed in relation to the childbirth experience (mode of delivery, number of medical interventions, obstetric violence, satisfaction with childbirth, physical well-being of women after childbirth). In February-March 2021, we conducted an online survey of 1645 mothers of infants aged 0-13 months. As a result, it was found that preparation for childbirth has no direct relationship with the mode of delivery, the woman's well-being after childbirth and the birth satisfaction. However, preparation for childbirth is associated with fewer medical interventions. Women who gave birth without individual support were less satisfied with their births, more likely to experience obstetric violence, more likely to give birth via caesarean section, with more medical interventions. Thus, support during labour is a safe way to improve the experience of childbirth and the quality of life for mothers in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":55959,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie-Psychological Science and Education","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie-Psychological Science and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of antenatal education and individual labour support in the context of the actual experience of childbirth and its psychological perception. Types of antenatal education and individual labour support were analysed in relation to the childbirth experience (mode of delivery, number of medical interventions, obstetric violence, satisfaction with childbirth, physical well-being of women after childbirth). In February-March 2021, we conducted an online survey of 1645 mothers of infants aged 0-13 months. As a result, it was found that preparation for childbirth has no direct relationship with the mode of delivery, the woman's well-being after childbirth and the birth satisfaction. However, preparation for childbirth is associated with fewer medical interventions. Women who gave birth without individual support were less satisfied with their births, more likely to experience obstetric violence, more likely to give birth via caesarean section, with more medical interventions. Thus, support during labour is a safe way to improve the experience of childbirth and the quality of life for mothers in general.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分娩教育和支持:与分娩满意度的关系
本研究的目的是比较产前教育和个人分娩支持在分娩实际经验和心理感知的背景下的有效性。根据分娩经验(分娩方式、医疗干预次数、产科暴力、对分娩的满意度、分娩后妇女的身体健康状况),分析了产前教育和个人分娩支助的类型。在2021年2月至3月,我们对1645名0-13个月婴儿的母亲进行了在线调查。结果发现,分娩准备与分娩方式、产妇产后幸福感和分娩满意度没有直接关系。然而,准备分娩与较少的医疗干预有关。在没有个人支持的情况下分娩的妇女对分娩的满意度较低,更有可能遭受产科暴力,更有可能通过剖腹产分娩,需要更多的医疗干预。因此,分娩期间的支持是一种安全的方式,可以改善分娩体验,提高母亲的总体生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
37.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficiency of Collaborative Computer Problem Solving by the Students of Adolescence and Youth: The Contribution of Social Intelligence Using Process Data of Task Performance in Creative Thinking Assessment Determinants of Blended Teaching-Learning Performance in New Normal Environment: Exploring the Role of Teachers' Technostress as Mediation Formation of Methodological Readiness of Undergraduates of the Psychological and Pedagogical Direction for Mediation in Conditions of Blended Learning Digital Literacy, Cognitive Control and Student Use of Digital Devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1