Public vs. Private Education and the Labor Market Disparities in Nepal: Evience From the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition

Kul Prasad Kapri, Shankar Ghimire, Rajendra Dulal
{"title":"Public vs. Private Education and the Labor Market Disparities in Nepal: Evience From the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition","authors":"Kul Prasad Kapri, Shankar Ghimire, Rajendra Dulal","doi":"10.1353/jda.2023.a907746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The debate between private and public education is a widely discussed issue in personal and policy forums globally. In Nepal, private schools have grown significantly due to the perceived advantages associated with them. This paper tests if there are significant differences in labor-market outcomes for individuals educated in private schools compared to those educated in public schools. Research Methodology and Data: We employ nationally representative household survey data from the Nepal Living Standards Survey (NLSS III), conducted by the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) Nepal in 2010/11, utilizing the Living Standards Measurement Survey (LMSS) methodology developed by the World Bank. We apply the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method to examine the relationship between educational attainment and four distinct measures of labor-market outcomes: labor force participation, employment status, job security, and wage income. Initially, we estimate these outcomes separately for individuals in private education and those in public education. Subsequently, we calculate and analyze whether the disparities in estimated values can be attributed to differences in education. Our findings reveal significant labor-market disparities between individuals participating in private education and those in public education. Those with private education display lower rates of labor force participation and reduced employment rates, suggesting fewer working hours. However, those employed within this group enjoy more secure salaried positions. Furthermore, private education is linked to higher wage incomes, primarily attributable to longer educational periods. The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition demonstrates that most of these disparities are associated with variations in educational backgrounds. Consequently, the results highlight the role of segregated education in contributing to labor-market inequality, emphasizing the impact of private schools in exacerbating economic disparities in Nepal. The findings underscore the significance of educational attainment in ameliorating disparities between individuals educated in public and private schools. To address these issues, policymakers should concentrate on strategies aimed at increasing the duration of education for public school students, such as providing free, quality higher education. By narrowing the educational gap between private and public institutions, the nation can work towards diminishing wage and job security disparities, fostering a more equitable society. These findings also have relevance for countries grappling with similar socio-economic challenges, initiating essential policy discussions.","PeriodicalId":84983,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Developing Areas","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Developing Areas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2023.a907746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The debate between private and public education is a widely discussed issue in personal and policy forums globally. In Nepal, private schools have grown significantly due to the perceived advantages associated with them. This paper tests if there are significant differences in labor-market outcomes for individuals educated in private schools compared to those educated in public schools. Research Methodology and Data: We employ nationally representative household survey data from the Nepal Living Standards Survey (NLSS III), conducted by the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) Nepal in 2010/11, utilizing the Living Standards Measurement Survey (LMSS) methodology developed by the World Bank. We apply the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method to examine the relationship between educational attainment and four distinct measures of labor-market outcomes: labor force participation, employment status, job security, and wage income. Initially, we estimate these outcomes separately for individuals in private education and those in public education. Subsequently, we calculate and analyze whether the disparities in estimated values can be attributed to differences in education. Our findings reveal significant labor-market disparities between individuals participating in private education and those in public education. Those with private education display lower rates of labor force participation and reduced employment rates, suggesting fewer working hours. However, those employed within this group enjoy more secure salaried positions. Furthermore, private education is linked to higher wage incomes, primarily attributable to longer educational periods. The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition demonstrates that most of these disparities are associated with variations in educational backgrounds. Consequently, the results highlight the role of segregated education in contributing to labor-market inequality, emphasizing the impact of private schools in exacerbating economic disparities in Nepal. The findings underscore the significance of educational attainment in ameliorating disparities between individuals educated in public and private schools. To address these issues, policymakers should concentrate on strategies aimed at increasing the duration of education for public school students, such as providing free, quality higher education. By narrowing the educational gap between private and public institutions, the nation can work towards diminishing wage and job security disparities, fostering a more equitable society. These findings also have relevance for countries grappling with similar socio-economic challenges, initiating essential policy discussions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔公立与私立教育与劳动力市场差异:来自布林德-瓦哈卡分解的证据
摘要:私立教育与公立教育之争是一个在全球个人和政策论坛上被广泛讨论的问题。在尼泊尔,私立学校发展迅速,因为人们认为私立学校具有优势。本文检验私立学校和公立学校教育的个体在劳动力市场结果上是否存在显著差异。研究方法和数据:我们采用尼泊尔中央统计局(CBS)于2010/11年开展的尼泊尔生活水平调查(NLSS III)中具有全国代表性的家庭调查数据,采用世界银行开发的生活水平测量调查(LMSS)方法。我们应用Blinder-Oaxaca分解方法来检验教育程度与劳动力市场结果的四个不同衡量指标之间的关系:劳动力参与、就业状况、工作保障和工资收入。最初,我们分别对私立教育和公立教育的个体进行了这些结果的估计。随后,我们计算并分析了估计值的差异是否可以归因于教育的差异。我们的研究结果显示,参加私立教育和参加公立教育的个人之间存在显著的劳动力市场差异。接受课外教育的人的劳动参与率更低,就业率也更低,这意味着工作时间更短。然而,在这一群体中工作的人享有更稳定的领薪职位。此外,私立教育与较高的工资收入有关,这主要归因于较长的教育时间。布林德-瓦哈卡的分解表明,这些差异大多与教育背景的差异有关。因此,研究结果强调了隔离教育在促进劳动力市场不平等方面的作用,强调了私立学校在加剧尼泊尔经济差距方面的影响。研究结果强调了教育程度在改善公立学校和私立学校教育的个体之间的差异方面的重要性。为了解决这些问题,政策制定者应该把重点放在旨在增加公立学校学生受教育时间的战略上,比如提供免费、高质量的高等教育。通过缩小私立和公立学校之间的教育差距,国家可以努力缩小工资和工作保障的差距,建立一个更加公平的社会。这些发现对面临类似社会经济挑战、启动必要政策讨论的国家也具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Earnings Announcement and Stock Prices of Quoted Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic Revisiting the Exchange Rate -Oil Price Nexus in Turbulent Period: What Can We Learn From Nigeria and South Africa During Covid-19? Trade Implications on Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIS) Due to COVID-19 Pandemic and India China Altercation Analysis of Non-Oil Exports – Economic Growth Relationship in Nigeria: The Role of Institutional Qualities Who are the Poor Farm households' in Nigeria and is this Population Changing Over Time?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1