The Understanding and Stability of Insertion Layers in Thread Lift

{"title":"The Understanding and Stability of Insertion Layers in Thread Lift","authors":"","doi":"10.29011/2575-9760.001903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thread lifting is popular for addressing the loss of facial skin elasticity and reducing wrinkles. However, the incidence of complications varies with the practitioner’s competence, the characteristics of materials used, and variations in procedural techniques. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of thread lifting procedures based on the insertion layer and suture length to propose different techniques tailored to the objective of thread lifting. We assessed the major complications observed in individuals who underwent thread lifting to evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of the procedure. From March 2022 to January 2023, we performed thread lifting using Vxil threads with uni-and multi-layer insertion on 24 patients, and evaluated the outcomes and complications. The mean age of the patients was 37.5 (range 24-63) years, and the mean follow-up period was 199 (range 188-207) days. An average of 4.4 long lines (2-8 lines) and 12.6 middle lines (8-16 lines) were used. The degree of pulling after insertion varied with the technique and length of threads. For uni-layer insertions, a greater amount of tissue displacement was observed. Displacement was also greater using long lines than using middle lines. The global aesthetic improvement scale score increased, indicating increased satisfaction, at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. Reported complications included edema, pain, foreign body sensation, bruising, asymmetry, and temporary sinking. Clinicians need to choose the appropriate thread and procedure technique based on their research and efforts to minimize complications and boost patient satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":92684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgery (Lisle, IL)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgery (Lisle, IL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2575-9760.001903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thread lifting is popular for addressing the loss of facial skin elasticity and reducing wrinkles. However, the incidence of complications varies with the practitioner’s competence, the characteristics of materials used, and variations in procedural techniques. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of thread lifting procedures based on the insertion layer and suture length to propose different techniques tailored to the objective of thread lifting. We assessed the major complications observed in individuals who underwent thread lifting to evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of the procedure. From March 2022 to January 2023, we performed thread lifting using Vxil threads with uni-and multi-layer insertion on 24 patients, and evaluated the outcomes and complications. The mean age of the patients was 37.5 (range 24-63) years, and the mean follow-up period was 199 (range 188-207) days. An average of 4.4 long lines (2-8 lines) and 12.6 middle lines (8-16 lines) were used. The degree of pulling after insertion varied with the technique and length of threads. For uni-layer insertions, a greater amount of tissue displacement was observed. Displacement was also greater using long lines than using middle lines. The global aesthetic improvement scale score increased, indicating increased satisfaction, at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. Reported complications included edema, pain, foreign body sensation, bruising, asymmetry, and temporary sinking. Clinicians need to choose the appropriate thread and procedure technique based on their research and efforts to minimize complications and boost patient satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
螺纹提升中插入层的理解与稳定性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Godzilla and the Fog: Should we Incorporate Air Pollution as a Surgical Risk Factor? Theoretical Basis of Comprehensive Treatment for Colorectal Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis Groin Hernia Repair in Female: Do we Need Mesh for the Repair? Joint Preservation in Patients with Grade-IV Osteo-Arthritis of The Knee – 12-Months Results after A Multimodal Approach Using Radiofrequency Ablation and Platelet-Rich-Plasma Supercharged Stem Cell-Rich Fat Graft in 42 Consecutive Patients Pulmonary, Splenic and Hepatic Hydatidosis : An Unusual Multivisceral Location in Children : A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1