Use Of Jacobs ESL Composition Profile to Evaluate University Students’ Writing

Hari Prasad Tiwari
{"title":"Use Of Jacobs ESL Composition Profile to Evaluate University Students’ Writing","authors":"Hari Prasad Tiwari","doi":"10.26858/eltww.v10i2.51632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A teacher should have an access to a reliable soring rubric in order to assess the ESL/ EFL (English as a Second Language/ English as a Foreign Language) students' writing abilities accurately. One of the most widely used tools for assessing writing skills of non-native speakers of English is Jacobs ESL Composition Profile which can help teachers tailor their instruction to better meet the needs of their students. The present study attempts to determine the internal consistency between teachers i.e. raters who use Jacob’s Scoring Rubric (SR) to evaluate students' essays, describe the level of students' writing performance as measured by the Jacob’s SR, and describe teachers' viewpoints while using the profile. The research utilizes descriptive quantitative research design. The participants consisted of two ESL/EFL teachers who have been teaching and testing writing at bachelor’s level for more than five years and 40 fourth year ESL/ EFL students studying at undergraduate level at Madhypaschim Multiple Campus, Nepalgunj Banke, Nepal. The researchers used judgmental sampling to select the participants of the study. The teachers were instructed to score 40 essays written by fourth-year students. The finding revealed High internal consistency (r = 0.86, α = 0.00 < 0.05) between TA and TB when assessing student essays using the Jacobs ESL Composition Profile. In addition, the Cronbach alpha analysis reveals a value of 0.918, which suggests a high degree of consistency. The writing performance of students was found to be in four categories: very good (3.75 %), good (52.5 %), satisfactory (36.5 %) and acceptable (7.5 %). The outcome of the research demonstrates that the Jacobs ESL Composition Profile remains reliable for essay scoring, even though proficiency and experience are necessary due to its comprehensive guidelines.","PeriodicalId":34655,"journal":{"name":"ELT Worldwide Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELT Worldwide Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v10i2.51632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A teacher should have an access to a reliable soring rubric in order to assess the ESL/ EFL (English as a Second Language/ English as a Foreign Language) students' writing abilities accurately. One of the most widely used tools for assessing writing skills of non-native speakers of English is Jacobs ESL Composition Profile which can help teachers tailor their instruction to better meet the needs of their students. The present study attempts to determine the internal consistency between teachers i.e. raters who use Jacob’s Scoring Rubric (SR) to evaluate students' essays, describe the level of students' writing performance as measured by the Jacob’s SR, and describe teachers' viewpoints while using the profile. The research utilizes descriptive quantitative research design. The participants consisted of two ESL/EFL teachers who have been teaching and testing writing at bachelor’s level for more than five years and 40 fourth year ESL/ EFL students studying at undergraduate level at Madhypaschim Multiple Campus, Nepalgunj Banke, Nepal. The researchers used judgmental sampling to select the participants of the study. The teachers were instructed to score 40 essays written by fourth-year students. The finding revealed High internal consistency (r = 0.86, α = 0.00 < 0.05) between TA and TB when assessing student essays using the Jacobs ESL Composition Profile. In addition, the Cronbach alpha analysis reveals a value of 0.918, which suggests a high degree of consistency. The writing performance of students was found to be in four categories: very good (3.75 %), good (52.5 %), satisfactory (36.5 %) and acceptable (7.5 %). The outcome of the research demonstrates that the Jacobs ESL Composition Profile remains reliable for essay scoring, even though proficiency and experience are necessary due to its comprehensive guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用雅各布斯的ESL作文评估大学生的写作水平
为了准确地评估ESL/ EFL(英语作为第二语言/英语作为外语)学生的写作能力,教师应该有一个可靠的评分标准。雅各布斯ESL作文简介是评估非英语母语者写作技能最广泛使用的工具之一,它可以帮助教师调整教学,以更好地满足学生的需求。本研究试图确定教师之间的内部一致性,即评分者使用雅各布评分准则(Jacob ' s Scoring Rubric, SR)来评估学生的论文,描述雅各布评分准则衡量的学生写作表现水平,并描述教师在使用个人资料时的观点。本研究采用描述性定量研究设计。参与者包括两名从事本科写作教学和测试工作超过五年的ESL/EFL教师,以及40名在尼泊尔班克Madhypaschim multicampus学习本科阶段的四年级ESL/EFL学生。研究人员使用判断抽样来选择研究的参与者。老师们被要求给四年级学生写的40篇文章打分。结果表明:内部一致性高(r = 0.86, α = 0.00 <0.05)在使用雅各布斯ESL作文档案评估学生作文时,TA和TB之间存在差异。此外,Cronbach alpha分析结果为0.918,表明一致性程度较高。学生的写作表现分为非常好(3.75%)、好(52.5%)、满意(36.5%)和可接受(7.5%)四类。研究结果表明,雅各布斯ESL作文档案仍然是可靠的作文评分,即使熟练和经验是必要的,由于其全面的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
EFL Students' Attitude Towards English Lessons Through Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum Challenges in Translating Idiomatic Expressions from English into Arabic The Effectiveness of Using Comic Strips Toward Students' Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Writing Analytical Exposition Text The Role of Target Culture in English Language Education: EFL Teachers’ Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1