Analysis on the volume expansion effect and influencing factors on loess landslides: a case study of the Heifangtai tableland in the Chinese Loess Plateau
Jia-xu Kong, Jian-qi Zhuang, Jian-bing Peng, Peng-hui Ma, Jie-wei Zhan, Jia-qi Mu, Jie Wang, Zuo-peng Wang
{"title":"Analysis on the volume expansion effect and influencing factors on loess landslides: a case study of the Heifangtai tableland in the Chinese Loess Plateau","authors":"Jia-xu Kong, Jian-qi Zhuang, Jian-bing Peng, Peng-hui Ma, Jie-wei Zhan, Jia-qi Mu, Jie Wang, Zuo-peng Wang","doi":"10.1080/17499518.2023.2257201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTLandslide scale measurement and hazard risk assessment are crucial, especially since landslide deposits often have an expansion effect, and can lead to more serious secondary hazard events. In this study, we obtained substantial high-resolution terrain and orthophoto data through multiple UAV photography and field surveys. Based on GIS spatial analysis and landslide geometric models, sliding and deposit data for 42 loess landslides in the Heifangtai tableland were calculated. The results show that sliding volume and sliding area have the highest correlation with the power-law distribution (Ve=1.204A1.1360). The ratio of Hmax/Lmax increases with the increase of sliding volume and deposit volume of the landslides, with an average value of 0.306. The ratio of H/L has a higher correlation with deposit volume, and the fitting expression is Hmax/Lmax=0.187VD−0.123. The VEC of 42 loess landslides ranged from 1.05 to 2.53, while the AVEC was about 1.503. The correlation analysis show that the VEC is positively correlated with AEC, Hmov, Hmov/Lmax and Lmov/Lmax but negatively correlated with Dave. The essence of the volume expansion effect is that landslide fluidity increases, resulting in looser deposit distribution, larger pore scale in the deposit and lower overall compaction. Loess collapse in the Heifangtai tableland lack protection from the liquefaction of the sliding mass basement, resulting in large VEC values. The semi-ellipsoid model is a valuable approach for landslide volume assessment in the Chinese Loess Plateau, yielding an average error rate of restoring the sliding volume of landslides of 13.55%. This study provides a useful reference for accurate evaluations at the landslide scale.KEYWORDS: Heifangtai tablelandLoess landslidevolume expansion effectUAV surveytopography and geometry of landslide AcknowledgementsThe authors are very grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their thoughtful review comments and suggestions which have significantly improved this paper. This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China: 42090053, 41922054, 42207197, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD, 300102262713.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China: [Grant Number 42090053, 41922054, 42207197]; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD: [Grant Number 300102262713].","PeriodicalId":48524,"journal":{"name":"Georisk-Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georisk-Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2023.2257201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTLandslide scale measurement and hazard risk assessment are crucial, especially since landslide deposits often have an expansion effect, and can lead to more serious secondary hazard events. In this study, we obtained substantial high-resolution terrain and orthophoto data through multiple UAV photography and field surveys. Based on GIS spatial analysis and landslide geometric models, sliding and deposit data for 42 loess landslides in the Heifangtai tableland were calculated. The results show that sliding volume and sliding area have the highest correlation with the power-law distribution (Ve=1.204A1.1360). The ratio of Hmax/Lmax increases with the increase of sliding volume and deposit volume of the landslides, with an average value of 0.306. The ratio of H/L has a higher correlation with deposit volume, and the fitting expression is Hmax/Lmax=0.187VD−0.123. The VEC of 42 loess landslides ranged from 1.05 to 2.53, while the AVEC was about 1.503. The correlation analysis show that the VEC is positively correlated with AEC, Hmov, Hmov/Lmax and Lmov/Lmax but negatively correlated with Dave. The essence of the volume expansion effect is that landslide fluidity increases, resulting in looser deposit distribution, larger pore scale in the deposit and lower overall compaction. Loess collapse in the Heifangtai tableland lack protection from the liquefaction of the sliding mass basement, resulting in large VEC values. The semi-ellipsoid model is a valuable approach for landslide volume assessment in the Chinese Loess Plateau, yielding an average error rate of restoring the sliding volume of landslides of 13.55%. This study provides a useful reference for accurate evaluations at the landslide scale.KEYWORDS: Heifangtai tablelandLoess landslidevolume expansion effectUAV surveytopography and geometry of landslide AcknowledgementsThe authors are very grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their thoughtful review comments and suggestions which have significantly improved this paper. This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China: 42090053, 41922054, 42207197, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD, 300102262713.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China: [Grant Number 42090053, 41922054, 42207197]; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD: [Grant Number 300102262713].
期刊介绍:
Georisk covers many diversified but interlinked areas of active research and practice, such as geohazards (earthquakes, landslides, avalanches, rockfalls, tsunamis, etc.), safety of engineered systems (dams, buildings, offshore structures, lifelines, etc.), environmental risk, seismic risk, reliability-based design and code calibration, geostatistics, decision analyses, structural reliability, maintenance and life cycle performance, risk and vulnerability, hazard mapping, loss assessment (economic, social, environmental, etc.), GIS databases, remote sensing, and many other related disciplines. The underlying theme is that uncertainties associated with geomaterials (soils, rocks), geologic processes, and possible subsequent treatments, are usually large and complex and these uncertainties play an indispensable role in the risk assessment and management of engineered and natural systems. Significant theoretical and practical challenges remain on quantifying these uncertainties and developing defensible risk management methodologies that are acceptable to decision makers and stakeholders. Many opportunities to leverage on the rapid advancement in Bayesian analysis, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and other data-driven methods also exist, which can greatly enhance our decision-making abilities. The basic goal of this international peer-reviewed journal is to provide a multi-disciplinary scientific forum for cross fertilization of ideas between interested parties working on various aspects of georisk to advance the state-of-the-art and the state-of-the-practice.