ON THE INTRODUCTION, DEVELOPMENT, IMPROVEMENT OF ELECTRONIC METHODS OF COLLECTING EVIDENTIARY INFORMATION IN CRIMINAL CASES

S. I. Afanaseva, O. V. Dobrovlyanina
{"title":"ON THE INTRODUCTION, DEVELOPMENT, IMPROVEMENT OF ELECTRONIC METHODS OF COLLECTING EVIDENTIARY INFORMATION IN CRIMINAL CASES","authors":"S. I. Afanaseva, O. V. Dobrovlyanina","doi":"10.17072/1995-4190-2023-60-349-377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the article analyzes the essence and innovative significance of digital evidence in criminal proceedings, discusses the procedural ways of collecting evidence that contains digital information during preliminary investigation and in court proceedings, justifies the need to modernize evidence-collecting activity. Purpose: based on the analysis of scientific sources and materials of investigative and judicial practice, to shape the understanding of a new regime of evidence-collecting activity in criminal proceedings resulting from the introduction of updated procedural methods for the collection of evidence containing digital information. Methods: general scientific dialectical method, universal scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, structural-functional method, formal-logical method), special legal methods (comparative legal method, method of system interpretation). Results: we analyzed the judicial and investigative practice of applying and scientific commenting on the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and other domestic procedural codes regulating the performance of procedural actions on the collection of evidence containing digital information. The analysis showed the need to improve the conceptual apparatus in the light of the digitalization of criminal justice procedure; revealed polarization of the legislator’s approaches to the turnover of evidence in various forms of legal proceedings. Following the analysis results, we propose unified standards of electronic evidence-collecting tools in Russian procedural legislation and the practice of their application. Conclusions: it is proposed to understand ‘digital evidence’ as both information in digital form and an electronic method of recording and storing digital data; to ensure an updated systematization of procedural actions on the collection of evidence having a digital component in pre-trial and trial proceedings; to expand the range of electronic tools of preliminary investigation and judicial review in criminal cases.","PeriodicalId":42087,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2023-60-349-377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: the article analyzes the essence and innovative significance of digital evidence in criminal proceedings, discusses the procedural ways of collecting evidence that contains digital information during preliminary investigation and in court proceedings, justifies the need to modernize evidence-collecting activity. Purpose: based on the analysis of scientific sources and materials of investigative and judicial practice, to shape the understanding of a new regime of evidence-collecting activity in criminal proceedings resulting from the introduction of updated procedural methods for the collection of evidence containing digital information. Methods: general scientific dialectical method, universal scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, structural-functional method, formal-logical method), special legal methods (comparative legal method, method of system interpretation). Results: we analyzed the judicial and investigative practice of applying and scientific commenting on the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and other domestic procedural codes regulating the performance of procedural actions on the collection of evidence containing digital information. The analysis showed the need to improve the conceptual apparatus in the light of the digitalization of criminal justice procedure; revealed polarization of the legislator’s approaches to the turnover of evidence in various forms of legal proceedings. Following the analysis results, we propose unified standards of electronic evidence-collecting tools in Russian procedural legislation and the practice of their application. Conclusions: it is proposed to understand ‘digital evidence’ as both information in digital form and an electronic method of recording and storing digital data; to ensure an updated systematization of procedural actions on the collection of evidence having a digital component in pre-trial and trial proceedings; to expand the range of electronic tools of preliminary investigation and judicial review in criminal cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论刑事案件证据信息电子采集方法的引进、发展与完善
导言:本文分析了刑事诉讼中数字证据的本质和创新意义,探讨了刑事初步侦查和刑事诉讼中包含数字信息的证据收集的程序方式,论证了刑事证据收集工作现代化的必要性。目的:在分析调查和司法实践的科学来源和材料的基础上,形成对刑事诉讼中收集证据活动的新制度的理解,这是由于采用了收集包含数字信息的证据的最新程序方法。方法:一般科学的辩证方法,普遍的科学方法(分析与综合、归纳与演绎、结构-功能法、形式-逻辑法),特殊的法律方法(比较法、系统解释法)。结果:分析了俄罗斯联邦《刑事诉讼法》和其他规范数字信息证据收集程序行为的国内诉讼法规范的适用和科学评议的司法和侦查实践。分析表明,在刑事司法程序数字化的背景下,需要完善概念装置;揭示了立法者在各种形式的法律诉讼中对证据转移的态度的两极分化。根据分析结果,提出了俄罗斯程序性立法中电子证据收集工具的统一标准及其应用实践。结论:建议将“数字证据”理解为数字形式的信息和记录和存储数字数据的电子方法;确保在预审和审判程序中采用数字化手段,对收集证据的程序行动进行系统化更新;扩大刑事案件初步侦查和司法审查电子工具的使用范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
THE AMALFI CODE (TABULA AMALFITANA): PUBLIC LAW PROVISIONS OF PRIVATE LAW ORIGIN BEHAVIORAL STANDARDS IN THE SYSTEM OF PRIVATE LAW RELATIONS RUSSIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM. A RETURN TO SACREDNESS THE AMALFI CODE (TABULA AMALFITANA): PUBLIC LAW PROVISIONS OF PRIVATE LAW ORIGIN DIVISION OF SUBJECTS OF JURISDICTION AND POWERS BETWEEN THE CENTER, REGIONS AND MUNICIPALITIES IN CONSTITUTIONS OF FEDERAL AND DECENTRALIZED COUNTRIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1