Optimal Tracer Identification for Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM) Source Tracking in Watersheds Using Point Source Effluent Load Data

Haeseong Oh, Ka-Young Jung, Bo Young Kim, Byung Joon Lee, Hyun-Sang Shin, Jin Hur
{"title":"Optimal Tracer Identification for Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM) Source Tracking in Watersheds Using Point Source Effluent Load Data","authors":"Haeseong Oh, Ka-Young Jung, Bo Young Kim, Byung Joon Lee, Hyun-Sang Shin, Jin Hur","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2023.103423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we characterized the optical and molecular weight (MW) properties of dissolved organic matter (DOM) with various sources in an agriculture-forestry watershed. We proposed a guideline to identify optimum DOM source tracers for downstream rivers during both rain and non-rain events, utilizing the load of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from point sources. Six descriptors were pre-selected based on established criteria in the literature, and fifteen pairs of these descriptors were evaluated for their applicability in end-member mixing analysis (EMMA). The results from EMMA provided inconsistent estimates of relative contributions from DOM sources across the fifteen pairs, with optical descriptors outperforming MW-based descriptors and their combinations. The optimal source tracers were determined by comparing relative contributions of DOM from upstream effluent wastewater using DOC load ratios calculated from on-site monitoring data and predictions based on EMMA. The pair of optical descriptors, HIX (humification index) and BIX (biological index), closely matched the measured load ratios with minimal discrepancies (0.4 ± 0.4%). According to the EMMA results using pairs of HIX and BIX, non-rain events were primarily influenced by oil-cake fertilizer and treated effluent wastewater, while rain event samples were dominated by manure and soils. These findings offer insights into managing non-point organic pollution sources in agricultural-forestry watersheds, contributing to our understanding of carbon and nutrient cycling in aquatic systems. Notably, this study proposes a validation guideline that employs load ratios of point sources, such as effluent wastewater, to enhance source tracking accuracy.","PeriodicalId":11899,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology and Innovation","volume":"64 8-9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we characterized the optical and molecular weight (MW) properties of dissolved organic matter (DOM) with various sources in an agriculture-forestry watershed. We proposed a guideline to identify optimum DOM source tracers for downstream rivers during both rain and non-rain events, utilizing the load of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from point sources. Six descriptors were pre-selected based on established criteria in the literature, and fifteen pairs of these descriptors were evaluated for their applicability in end-member mixing analysis (EMMA). The results from EMMA provided inconsistent estimates of relative contributions from DOM sources across the fifteen pairs, with optical descriptors outperforming MW-based descriptors and their combinations. The optimal source tracers were determined by comparing relative contributions of DOM from upstream effluent wastewater using DOC load ratios calculated from on-site monitoring data and predictions based on EMMA. The pair of optical descriptors, HIX (humification index) and BIX (biological index), closely matched the measured load ratios with minimal discrepancies (0.4 ± 0.4%). According to the EMMA results using pairs of HIX and BIX, non-rain events were primarily influenced by oil-cake fertilizer and treated effluent wastewater, while rain event samples were dominated by manure and soils. These findings offer insights into managing non-point organic pollution sources in agricultural-forestry watersheds, contributing to our understanding of carbon and nutrient cycling in aquatic systems. Notably, this study proposes a validation guideline that employs load ratios of point sources, such as effluent wastewater, to enhance source tracking accuracy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于点源排放负荷数据的流域溶解性有机物(DOM)源跟踪的最优示踪剂识别
在本研究中,我们表征了农林业流域中不同来源的溶解有机物(DOM)的光学性质和分子量(MW)。我们提出了一项指导方针,利用点源的溶解有机碳(DOC)负荷,在降雨和非降雨情况下为下游河流确定最佳DOM源示踪剂。根据文献中建立的标准预先选择了6个描述符,并评估了15对描述符在端元混合分析(EMMA)中的适用性。EMMA的结果提供了15对DOM源相对贡献的不一致估计,光学描述符优于基于mw的描述符及其组合。通过使用现场监测数据计算的DOC负荷比和基于EMMA的预测,比较上游废水中DOM的相对贡献,确定最佳源示踪剂。HIX(腐殖化指数)和BIX(生物指数)这对光学描述符与测量的负载比非常接近,差异极小(0.4±0.4%)。利用HIX和BIX对EMMA结果表明,非降雨事件主要受油饼肥和处理后的废水的影响,而降雨事件样品主要受粪便和土壤的影响。这些发现为管理农林流域非点源有机污染源提供了见解,有助于我们了解水生系统中的碳和养分循环。值得注意的是,本研究提出了一个使用点源(如废水)负载比率的验证指南,以提高源跟踪准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emission characteristics of typical gas pollutants during oxygen-enriched waste incineration process Assessing the ecological impact and microbial restoration of quinclorac-contaminated paddy fields through high-throughput sequencing technology Enhancing biofilm growth in an integrated fixed-film activated sludge process through modification of polypropylene carriers Curcumin-loaded hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for enriched removal of organic pollutants and inhibition of dual-species biofilm formation Influences of lithium on soil microbial biomass, bacterial community structure, diversity, and function potential
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1