Mandatory R&D disclosure and analyst forecast Accuracy: Evidence from an emerging market

IF 2.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics Pub Date : 2023-06-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jcae.2023.100366
Baohua Liu , Dan Huang , Tao Chen , Kam C. Chan
{"title":"Mandatory R&D disclosure and analyst forecast Accuracy: Evidence from an emerging market","authors":"Baohua Liu ,&nbsp;Dan Huang ,&nbsp;Tao Chen ,&nbsp;Kam C. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2023.100366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Exploiting the mandatory R&amp;D disclosure policy in China, we capitalize on a difference-in-differences framework to examine whether mandatory R&amp;D disclosure matters to analyst forecast accuracy in a sample of technology intensive firms. We find that, after mandatory R&amp;D disclosure, forecast errors decrease significantly more for treatment firms (i.e., firms that chose not to disclose R&amp;D investments before the mandate policy) relative to control firms (i.e., firms that did voluntary disclosure of R&amp;D investments before the mandate policy). Further, we show that the impact of mandatory R&amp;D disclosure is more pronounced when there is high information asymmetry within the firm or an </span>industry as well as when analysts are working under unfavorable conditions. Overall, our findings demonstrate the positive effect of mandatory R&amp;D disclosure on reducing information asymmetry and shed light on the importance of R&amp;D disclosure reform in developing markets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 100366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566923000164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exploiting the mandatory R&D disclosure policy in China, we capitalize on a difference-in-differences framework to examine whether mandatory R&D disclosure matters to analyst forecast accuracy in a sample of technology intensive firms. We find that, after mandatory R&D disclosure, forecast errors decrease significantly more for treatment firms (i.e., firms that chose not to disclose R&D investments before the mandate policy) relative to control firms (i.e., firms that did voluntary disclosure of R&D investments before the mandate policy). Further, we show that the impact of mandatory R&D disclosure is more pronounced when there is high information asymmetry within the firm or an industry as well as when analysts are working under unfavorable conditions. Overall, our findings demonstrate the positive effect of mandatory R&D disclosure on reducing information asymmetry and shed light on the importance of R&D disclosure reform in developing markets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制性研发披露与分析师预测准确性:来自新兴市场的证据
利用中国的强制性研发披露政策,我们利用差异中的差异框架来检验强制性研发披露是否对技术密集型企业样本的分析师预测准确性有影响。研究发现,在强制披露R&D投资后,处理型企业(即在授权政策实施前选择不披露R&D投资的企业)的预测误差显著低于控制型企业(即在授权政策实施前自愿披露R&D投资的企业)。此外,我们表明,当企业或行业内部存在高度信息不对称以及分析师在不利条件下工作时,强制性研发披露的影响更为明显。总体而言,我们的研究结果证明了强制性研发披露对减少信息不对称的积极作用,并揭示了发展中市场研发披露改革的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Expanded auditor’s reports and voluntary disclosure Long-term tax strategy and corporate acquisition payment structure: An analysis based on the book-tax tradeoff theory Dividend signalling and investor protection: An international comparison MD&A tone and stock returns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1