Governance of dependency relationships in mandated networks

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1080/23276665.2023.2270085
Dayashankar Maurya, M Ramesh, Michael Howlett
{"title":"Governance of dependency relationships in mandated networks","authors":"Dayashankar Maurya, M Ramesh, Michael Howlett","doi":"10.1080/23276665.2023.2270085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMandated service delivery networks have become common in both developing and developed worlds; however, our understanding of what makes these arrangements work is still limited. In this study, we draw upon existing business literature, specifically focusing on dependency relationships and resulting opportunism within mandated networks, a critical but often overlooked aspect. Further, within mandated networks characterised by limited autonomy and trust, ways in which network members navigate dependency relationships remain unexplored. We conduct a comparative case analysis, examining network arrangements within India’s National Health Insurance Programme. Based on our findings, we propose that the nature of interdependence among network members and the resultant dependency relationships impact the conduct of network members and, thereby, network performance. If the dependency relationships are not governed effectively, conflict bargaining and opportunistic behaviours get manifested. Contrary to expectation, network performance tends to be higher in jurisdictions where dependency relationships are effectively governed through hierarchical authority. These findings hold significant relevance; as mandated networks are created under the shadow of hierarchy but governed through clan or trust-based mechanisms.KEYWORDS: Mandated networkdependency relationshipsnetwork governancenetwork effectivenesspolicy implementation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Opportunism is defined as “the pursuit of self-interest in an exchange that violates either explicit or implicit norms of contract and that has an adverse effect on the other party” (Williamson Citation1985; MacNeil Citation1978).Additional informationNotes on contributorsDayashankar MauryaDayashankar Maurya is associate professor, Institute of Rural Management Anand India. Earlier he worked as associate professor, Graduate School of International Relations International University of Japan. He received Masters and PhD in Public Policy from National University of Singapore. His research is concerned with governance, policy implementation, public-private partnership and health and social policy. He has published in Public Management Review, Social Policy and Administration, and Policy Design and Practice.M RameshM. Ramesh is UNESCO Chair of Social Policy Design in Asia. Previously, he was the Founding Head of the Department of Asian and Policy at the Hong Kong Institute of Education; Professor of Social Policy at the University of Hong Kong; and Chair of the Department of Government and International Relations at the University of Sydney. He has also held teaching positions at the University of New England and Victoria University of Wellington. Specialising in public policy and governance in Asia with a particular focus on social policy, Ramesh has authored and edited many books. His co-authored textbook Studying Public Policy has been translated into over a dozen languages and is used throughout the world. His books and journal articles on social policy in Asia are the standard starting points for research on the subject. He has also published extensively in reputed international journals. He is the Editor of Policy and Society and Associate Editor of Journal of Economic Policy Reform and serves on the editorial board of several reputed journals. Moreover, he has served as consultant to prominent international organizations.Michael HowlettMichael Howlett (Professor) BSocSci.(Hon)(Ott), MA(Br Col), PhD (Queen’s) is Canada Research Chair in Policy and Innovation for Climate Change and Burnaby Mountain Chair in the Department of Political Science at Simon Fraser University. He specializes in public policy analysis, political economy, and resource and environmental policy. He has published extensively in reputed international journals and has number of books to his credit. He is the Editor in Chief of Policy Sciences and serves on the editorial board of several reputed journals.","PeriodicalId":43945,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2270085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTMandated service delivery networks have become common in both developing and developed worlds; however, our understanding of what makes these arrangements work is still limited. In this study, we draw upon existing business literature, specifically focusing on dependency relationships and resulting opportunism within mandated networks, a critical but often overlooked aspect. Further, within mandated networks characterised by limited autonomy and trust, ways in which network members navigate dependency relationships remain unexplored. We conduct a comparative case analysis, examining network arrangements within India’s National Health Insurance Programme. Based on our findings, we propose that the nature of interdependence among network members and the resultant dependency relationships impact the conduct of network members and, thereby, network performance. If the dependency relationships are not governed effectively, conflict bargaining and opportunistic behaviours get manifested. Contrary to expectation, network performance tends to be higher in jurisdictions where dependency relationships are effectively governed through hierarchical authority. These findings hold significant relevance; as mandated networks are created under the shadow of hierarchy but governed through clan or trust-based mechanisms.KEYWORDS: Mandated networkdependency relationshipsnetwork governancenetwork effectivenesspolicy implementation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Opportunism is defined as “the pursuit of self-interest in an exchange that violates either explicit or implicit norms of contract and that has an adverse effect on the other party” (Williamson Citation1985; MacNeil Citation1978).Additional informationNotes on contributorsDayashankar MauryaDayashankar Maurya is associate professor, Institute of Rural Management Anand India. Earlier he worked as associate professor, Graduate School of International Relations International University of Japan. He received Masters and PhD in Public Policy from National University of Singapore. His research is concerned with governance, policy implementation, public-private partnership and health and social policy. He has published in Public Management Review, Social Policy and Administration, and Policy Design and Practice.M RameshM. Ramesh is UNESCO Chair of Social Policy Design in Asia. Previously, he was the Founding Head of the Department of Asian and Policy at the Hong Kong Institute of Education; Professor of Social Policy at the University of Hong Kong; and Chair of the Department of Government and International Relations at the University of Sydney. He has also held teaching positions at the University of New England and Victoria University of Wellington. Specialising in public policy and governance in Asia with a particular focus on social policy, Ramesh has authored and edited many books. His co-authored textbook Studying Public Policy has been translated into over a dozen languages and is used throughout the world. His books and journal articles on social policy in Asia are the standard starting points for research on the subject. He has also published extensively in reputed international journals. He is the Editor of Policy and Society and Associate Editor of Journal of Economic Policy Reform and serves on the editorial board of several reputed journals. Moreover, he has served as consultant to prominent international organizations.Michael HowlettMichael Howlett (Professor) BSocSci.(Hon)(Ott), MA(Br Col), PhD (Queen’s) is Canada Research Chair in Policy and Innovation for Climate Change and Burnaby Mountain Chair in the Department of Political Science at Simon Fraser University. He specializes in public policy analysis, political economy, and resource and environmental policy. He has published extensively in reputed international journals and has number of books to his credit. He is the Editor in Chief of Policy Sciences and serves on the editorial board of several reputed journals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制网络中依赖关系的治理
摘要强制性服务交付网络在发展中国家和发达国家都很普遍;然而,我们对是什么使这些安排起作用的理解仍然有限。在本研究中,我们借鉴了现有的商业文献,特别关注强制性网络中的依赖关系和由此产生的机会主义,这是一个关键但经常被忽视的方面。此外,在以有限的自主性和信任为特征的强制性网络中,网络成员驾驭依赖关系的方式仍未得到探索。我们进行比较案例分析,检查印度国家健康保险方案内的网络安排。基于我们的研究结果,我们提出网络成员之间相互依赖的性质以及由此产生的依赖关系会影响网络成员的行为,从而影响网络绩效。如果依赖关系没有得到有效的治理,就会出现冲突讨价还价和机会主义行为。与预期相反,在依赖关系通过等级权威有效治理的管辖范围内,网络性能往往更高。这些发现具有重要的相关性;作为强制性网络是在等级制度的阴影下创建的,但通过氏族或基于信任的机制进行管理。关键词:强制网络依赖关系、网络治理、网络有效性、政策实施披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。机会主义被定义为“在交换中追求自身利益,违反了明示或隐含的合同规范,并对另一方产生不利影响”(Williamson citation, 1985;麦克尼尔Citation1978)。作者简介:dayashankar Maurya,印度农村管理研究所副教授。此前,他曾担任日本国际大学国际关系研究生院副教授。他获得新加坡国立大学公共政策硕士和博士学位。他的研究涉及治理、政策实施、公私伙伴关系以及卫生和社会政策。曾在《公共管理评论》、《社会政策与行政》、《政策设计与实践》等刊物上发表文章。M RameshM。拉梅什是联合国教科文组织亚洲社会政策设计主席。在此之前,他是香港教育学院亚洲及政策学系的创始主任;香港大学社会政策学系教授;现任悉尼大学政府与国际关系系主任。他还曾在新英格兰大学和惠灵顿维多利亚大学任教。拉梅什专门研究亚洲的公共政策和治理,尤其关注社会政策,撰写和编辑了许多书籍。他与人合著的教科书《公共政策研究》已被翻译成十几种语言,在世界各地使用。他关于亚洲社会政策的书籍和期刊文章是研究这一主题的标准起点。他还在国际知名期刊上发表了大量文章。他是《政策与社会》杂志的编辑,《经济政策改革杂志》的副主编,并在多家知名期刊的编辑委员会任职。此外,他还担任过著名国际组织的顾问。Michael Howlett(教授)社会科学学士(Hon)(Ott),文学硕士(Br Col),博士(Queen’s),加拿大气候变化政策与创新研究主席,西蒙弗雷泽大学政治学系本拿比山主席。他的专长是公共政策分析、政治经济学、资源与环境政策。他在国际知名期刊上发表了大量文章,并出版了许多书籍。他是《政策科学》杂志的主编,并在几家知名期刊的编辑委员会任职。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
20.70%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Religiosity and work motives among public sector employees The role of Confucian values in Korean administrative culture: a cultural-contextual perspective Change management, performance feedback, and public service motivation: cultivating change-oriented behaviour in public organisations Exploring the effectiveness of youth outreach programmes: the case of Singapore The brave new world of AI: implications for public sector agents, organisations, and governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1