A comprehensive evaluation of explainable Artificial Intelligence techniques in stroke diagnosis: A systematic review

Abstract

Stroke presents a formidable global health threat, carrying significant risks and challenges. Timely intervention and improved outcomes hinge on the integration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) into medical decision-making. XAI, an evolving field, enhances the transparency of conventional Artificial Intelligence (AI) models. This systematic review addresses key research questions: How is XAI applied in the context of stroke diagnosis? To what extent can XAI elucidate the outputs of machine learning models? Which systematic evaluation methodologies are employed, and what categories of explainable approaches (Model Explanation, Outcome Explanation, Model Inspection) are prevalent We conducted this review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our search encompassed five databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and Scopus, spanning studies published between January 1988 and June 2023. Various combinations of search terms, including “stroke,” “explainable,” “interpretable,” “machine learning,” “artificial intelligence,” and “XAI,” were employed. This study identified 17 primary studies employing explainable machine learning techniques for stroke diagnosis. Among these studies, 94.1% incorporated XAI for model visualization, and 47.06% employed model inspection. It is noteworthy that none of the studies employed evaluation metrics such as D, R, F, or S to assess the performance of their XAI systems. Furthermore, none evaluated human confidence in utilizing XAI for stroke diagnosis. Explainable Artificial Intelligence serves as a vital tool in enhancing trust among both patients and healthcare providers in the diagnostic process. The effective implementation of systematic evaluation metrics is crucial for harnessing the potential of XAI in improving stroke diagnosis.