Stacking nitrogen leaching mitigations in a Canterbury dairy system whilst minimising profitability losses.

Q3 Environmental Science Journal of New Zealand Grasslands Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.33584/jnzg.2023.85.3638
Taisekwa Lordwell Chikazhe, Pierre Beukes, Racheal Bryant, Jacobus Kok, Stewart Ledgard, J.Paul Edwards, Claire Phyn
{"title":"Stacking nitrogen leaching mitigations in a Canterbury dairy system whilst minimising profitability losses.","authors":"Taisekwa Lordwell Chikazhe, Pierre Beukes, Racheal Bryant, Jacobus Kok, Stewart Ledgard, J.Paul Edwards, Claire Phyn","doi":"10.33584/jnzg.2023.85.3638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this project was to model combinations (“stacks”) of cost-effective nitrogen (N) leaching mitigations within a dairy system that could reduce N leaching by 40-60%, whilst minimising losses in profitability. A FARMAX and OverseerFM combination was used to model a baseline farm representing a typical Canterbury system, and seven sequentially “stacked” mitigated systems. The mitigations were combined and stacked in the following order based on mechanism(s) of action, practicality, and cost-effectiveness: 1) reduced synthetic N fertiliser input (from 190 to 100 kg N/ha/year); 2) including Italian ryegrass in the pasture sward; 3) including plantain in the pasture sward; 4) earlier calving and drying off (by 10 days); 5) wintering on pasture and baleage; 6) standing cows off-pasture;7) using new-generation nitrification inhibitors. The most cost-effective stack combined mitigations 1 to 5. We estimated that N leaching was reduced by 57% relative to baseline, with an 8% reduction in operating profit. Greenhouse gas emissions were reduced by 8%. The largest single reduction in N leaching was from stack #5, and it coincided with no/little change in milk production pasture eaten and had no capital cost. A careful selection of complementary mitigations could achieve significant reductions in N leaching without compromising greenhouse gas emissions and, to any great extent, profitability.","PeriodicalId":36573,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Zealand Grasslands","volume":" 589","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Zealand Grasslands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2023.85.3638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this project was to model combinations (“stacks”) of cost-effective nitrogen (N) leaching mitigations within a dairy system that could reduce N leaching by 40-60%, whilst minimising losses in profitability. A FARMAX and OverseerFM combination was used to model a baseline farm representing a typical Canterbury system, and seven sequentially “stacked” mitigated systems. The mitigations were combined and stacked in the following order based on mechanism(s) of action, practicality, and cost-effectiveness: 1) reduced synthetic N fertiliser input (from 190 to 100 kg N/ha/year); 2) including Italian ryegrass in the pasture sward; 3) including plantain in the pasture sward; 4) earlier calving and drying off (by 10 days); 5) wintering on pasture and baleage; 6) standing cows off-pasture;7) using new-generation nitrification inhibitors. The most cost-effective stack combined mitigations 1 to 5. We estimated that N leaching was reduced by 57% relative to baseline, with an 8% reduction in operating profit. Greenhouse gas emissions were reduced by 8%. The largest single reduction in N leaching was from stack #5, and it coincided with no/little change in milk production pasture eaten and had no capital cost. A careful selection of complementary mitigations could achieve significant reductions in N leaching without compromising greenhouse gas emissions and, to any great extent, profitability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
堆积氮淋溶减缓在坎特伯雷乳品系统,同时最大限度地减少盈利损失。
该项目的目的是模拟在乳制品系统中具有成本效益的氮(N)浸出缓解组合(“堆栈”),可以减少40-60%的氮浸出,同时最大限度地减少盈利损失。使用FARMAX和OverseerFM组合来模拟一个代表典型坎特伯雷系统的基线农场,以及七个依次“堆叠”的缓解系统。根据作用机制、实用性和成本效益,将缓解措施按以下顺序组合和堆叠:1)减少合成氮肥投入(从190公斤/公顷/年减少到100公斤/公顷/年);2)牧场草地中包括意大利黑麦草;3)将车前草纳入牧场草地;4)提早产犊和干燥(提前10天);5)在牧草和牧草上越冬;6)放牧奶牛;7)使用新一代硝化抑制剂。最具成本效益的组合缓解措施1至5。我们估计N浸出相对于基线减少了57%,营业利润减少了8%。温室气体排放量减少8%。单次氮淋失减少最多的是第5堆,它与牧场食用的牛奶产量没有或很少变化相吻合,并且没有资本成本。仔细选择互补的缓解措施可以在不影响温室气体排放和在很大程度上影响盈利能力的情况下实现氮淋溶的显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of New Zealand Grasslands
Journal of New Zealand Grasslands Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Legume yield and persistence when sown in grass and herb pasture mixes in Lees Valley, South Island High Country Māori cultural values and soil fertility management – an exploratory study An assessment of the agronomic effectiveness of N‐(n‐butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (nBTPT) - treated urea on the production of clover-based pastures, pastures, grasses and crops. Using leaf regrowth stage to define defoliation interval for diverse pastures of complementary species (Lolium perenne L., Bromus valdivianus Phil., Dactylis glomerata L. and Trifolium repens L.) Five-year old diversified pasture delivers greater lamb liveweight gain than a standard perennial ryegrass-white clover pasture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1