The Clinical and Economic Impact of Employees Who Are Care Partners of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis by Disease Severity

Barry Hendin, Richard Brook, Ian Beren, Nathan Kleinman, Cindy Fink, Amy Phillips, Carroline Lobo
{"title":"The Clinical and Economic Impact of Employees Who Are Care Partners of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis by Disease Severity","authors":"Barry Hendin, Richard Brook, Ian Beren, Nathan Kleinman, Cindy Fink, Amy Phillips, Carroline Lobo","doi":"10.36469/jheor.2023.57593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Research on employee care partners of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is limited. Objectives: The clinical and economic impact on employee care partners was evaluated by MS disease severity. Methods: Employees with spouses/domestic partners with MS from the Workpartners database (Jan. 1, 2010–Dec. 31, 2019) were eligible if: spouse/partner had at least 3 MS-related (ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM:340.xx/G35) inpatient/outpatient/disease-modifying therapy claims within 1 year (latest claim = index date); 6-month pre-index/1-year post-index enrollment; and age 18 to 64 years. Employee care partners’ demographic/clinical characteristics and direct/indirect costs were compared across predetermined MS severity categories. Logistic and generalized linear regression modeled the costs. Results: Among 1041 employee care partners of patients with MS, 358 (34.4%) patients had mild MS, 491 (47.2%) moderate, and 192 (18.4%) severe. Mean (standard error [SE]) employee care partner age was 49.0 (0.5) for patients with mild disease, 50.5 (0.4) for moderate, 51.7 (0.6) for severe; percent female care partners was 24.6% [2.3%] mild, 19.8% [1.8%] moderate, 27.6% [3.2%] severe; and mean care partner Charlson Comorbidity Index scores 0.28 (0.05) mild, 0.30 (0.04) moderate, 0.27 (0.06) severe. More care partners of patients with moderate/severe vs mild MS had hyperlipidemia (32.6%/31.8% vs 21.2%), hypertension (29.5%/29.7% vs 19.3%), gastrointestinal disease (20.8%/22.9% vs 13.1%), depression (9.2%/10.9% vs 3.9%), and anxiety 10.6%/8.9% vs 4.2%). Adjusted mean medical costs were greater for employee care partners of patients with moderate vs mild/severe disease (P<.001). Pharmacy costs (SE) were lower for employee care partners of mild vs severe/moderate patients (P<.005). Sick leave costs (SE) were greater for employee care partners of mild/severe vs moderate patients (P<.05). Discussion: Employee care partners of patients with moderate/severe vs mild MS had more comorbidities (ie, hypertension, gastrointestinal disease, depression, and anxiety) and higher pharmacy costs. Employee care partners of patients with moderate vs mild/severe MS had higher medical and lower sick leave costs. Treatment strategies that improve patient outcomes may reduce employee care partner burden and lower costs for employers in some instances. Conclusions: Comorbidities and direct/indirect costs of employees whose spouses/partners have MS were considerable and varied with MS severity.","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2023.57593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research on employee care partners of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is limited. Objectives: The clinical and economic impact on employee care partners was evaluated by MS disease severity. Methods: Employees with spouses/domestic partners with MS from the Workpartners database (Jan. 1, 2010–Dec. 31, 2019) were eligible if: spouse/partner had at least 3 MS-related (ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM:340.xx/G35) inpatient/outpatient/disease-modifying therapy claims within 1 year (latest claim = index date); 6-month pre-index/1-year post-index enrollment; and age 18 to 64 years. Employee care partners’ demographic/clinical characteristics and direct/indirect costs were compared across predetermined MS severity categories. Logistic and generalized linear regression modeled the costs. Results: Among 1041 employee care partners of patients with MS, 358 (34.4%) patients had mild MS, 491 (47.2%) moderate, and 192 (18.4%) severe. Mean (standard error [SE]) employee care partner age was 49.0 (0.5) for patients with mild disease, 50.5 (0.4) for moderate, 51.7 (0.6) for severe; percent female care partners was 24.6% [2.3%] mild, 19.8% [1.8%] moderate, 27.6% [3.2%] severe; and mean care partner Charlson Comorbidity Index scores 0.28 (0.05) mild, 0.30 (0.04) moderate, 0.27 (0.06) severe. More care partners of patients with moderate/severe vs mild MS had hyperlipidemia (32.6%/31.8% vs 21.2%), hypertension (29.5%/29.7% vs 19.3%), gastrointestinal disease (20.8%/22.9% vs 13.1%), depression (9.2%/10.9% vs 3.9%), and anxiety 10.6%/8.9% vs 4.2%). Adjusted mean medical costs were greater for employee care partners of patients with moderate vs mild/severe disease (P<.001). Pharmacy costs (SE) were lower for employee care partners of mild vs severe/moderate patients (P<.005). Sick leave costs (SE) were greater for employee care partners of mild/severe vs moderate patients (P<.05). Discussion: Employee care partners of patients with moderate/severe vs mild MS had more comorbidities (ie, hypertension, gastrointestinal disease, depression, and anxiety) and higher pharmacy costs. Employee care partners of patients with moderate vs mild/severe MS had higher medical and lower sick leave costs. Treatment strategies that improve patient outcomes may reduce employee care partner burden and lower costs for employers in some instances. Conclusions: Comorbidities and direct/indirect costs of employees whose spouses/partners have MS were considerable and varied with MS severity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同疾病严重程度的多发性硬化症患者护理伙伴员工的临床和经济影响
背景:对多发性硬化症(MS)患者员工关怀伴侣的研究有限。目的:通过MS疾病严重程度评估对员工护理伙伴的临床和经济影响。方法:工作伙伴数据库中配偶/同居伴侣患有多发性硬化症的员工(2010年1月1日- 2010年12月1日)。如果:配偶/伴侣在1年内至少有3次ms相关(ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM:340.xx/G35)住院/门诊/疾病改善治疗索赔(最晚索赔=索引日期);指数前6个月/指数后1年入学;年龄从18岁到64岁。员工护理伙伴的人口统计学/临床特征和直接/间接成本在预定的MS严重程度类别中进行比较。Logistic和广义线性回归对成本进行建模。结果:1041名MS员工护理伴中,轻度MS 358名(34.4%),中度MS 491名(47.2%),重度MS 192名(18.4%)。轻症患者的平均(标准误差[SE])员工护理伴侣年龄为49.0(0.5),中度患者为50.5(0.4),重度患者为51.7 (0.6);女性护理伴为轻度24.6%[2.3%],中度19.8%[1.8%],重度27.6% [3.2%];平均护理伴Charlson共病指数为轻度0.28(0.05),中度0.30(0.04),重度0.27(0.06)。中度/重度MS患者与轻度MS患者的护理伴有高脂血症(32.6%/31.8% vs 21.2%)、高血压(29.5%/29.7% vs 19.3%)、胃肠道疾病(20.8%/22.9% vs 13.1%)、抑郁症(9.2%/10.9% vs 3.9%)、焦虑症(10.6%/8.9% vs 4.2%)。调整后的平均医疗费用对于中度疾病患者的员工护理伙伴大于轻度/重度疾病患者(P<.001)。轻、重度/中度患者的员工护理伙伴的药房费用(SE)低于重、中度患者(P<.005)。轻/重度患者的员工护理伙伴的病假费用(SE)高于中度患者(P< 0.05)。讨论:中度/重度MS患者与轻度MS患者的员工护理伙伴有更多的合并症(即高血压、胃肠道疾病、抑郁和焦虑)和更高的药房费用。中度与轻度/重度多发性硬化症患者的员工护理伙伴有较高的医疗费用和较低的病假费用。在某些情况下,改善患者预后的治疗策略可能会减轻员工护理伙伴的负担,并降低雇主的成本。结论:配偶/伴侣患有多发性硬化症的员工的合并症和直接/间接费用相当可观,且随多发性硬化症严重程度的不同而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Complications, Resource Utilization, and Cost of Care. Exploring Quality of Life in Adults Living With Late-onset Pompe Disease: A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Patient Perceptions from Australia, France, Italy, and the Netherlands. Cost-Utility Analysis of Add-on Cannabidiol vs Usual Care Alone for the Treatment of Seizures in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome or Dravet Syndrome in the Netherlands. The Effects of Adverse Events and Associated Costs on Value-Based Care for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Could the Inflation Reduction Act Maximum Fair Price Hurt Patients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1