Endoscopic treatment of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of The Korean Medical Association Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.5124/jkma.2023.66.11.642
Yunho Jung
{"title":"Endoscopic treatment of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer","authors":"Yunho Jung","doi":"10.5124/jkma.2023.66.11.642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Colonoscopy offers higher diagnostic sensitivity than other colorectal cancer screening methods and provides the advantage of both diagnostic tissue sampling and polyp removal. Since the majority of colorectal cancers evolve from adenomatous polyps, polyp resection through colonoscopy is widely considered an effective method of preventing colorectal cancer and reducing mortality rates.Current Concepts: Determining colorectal polyp size and shape requires comprehensive endoscopy with enhanced imaging techniques to choose treatment directions and the appropriate colorectal polypectomy method. The selection of the polypectomy method is contingent upon the polyp’s attributes and possible malignancy according to US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and European gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines. This article examines eight polypectomy procedures: cold forceps polypectomy, hot biopsy polypectomy, cold snare polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and modified EMR techniques. Each method has unique benefits and is suitable for particular polyp types and sizes. Piecemeal EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection offer alternatives for larger or challenging lesions that require careful planning and follow-up. After endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer, further surgery may be necessary depending on the risk of lymph node metastasis as determined by specific histologic findings following Korean and Japanese guidelines.Discussion and Conclusion: The choice of endoscopic resection technique, which depends on factors such as polyp shape, size, and location as well as endoscopist skill, is crucial for ensuring complete polyp removal.","PeriodicalId":17300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Medical Association","volume":" 97","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2023.66.11.642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy offers higher diagnostic sensitivity than other colorectal cancer screening methods and provides the advantage of both diagnostic tissue sampling and polyp removal. Since the majority of colorectal cancers evolve from adenomatous polyps, polyp resection through colonoscopy is widely considered an effective method of preventing colorectal cancer and reducing mortality rates.Current Concepts: Determining colorectal polyp size and shape requires comprehensive endoscopy with enhanced imaging techniques to choose treatment directions and the appropriate colorectal polypectomy method. The selection of the polypectomy method is contingent upon the polyp’s attributes and possible malignancy according to US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and European gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines. This article examines eight polypectomy procedures: cold forceps polypectomy, hot biopsy polypectomy, cold snare polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and modified EMR techniques. Each method has unique benefits and is suitable for particular polyp types and sizes. Piecemeal EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection offer alternatives for larger or challenging lesions that require careful planning and follow-up. After endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer, further surgery may be necessary depending on the risk of lymph node metastasis as determined by specific histologic findings following Korean and Japanese guidelines.Discussion and Conclusion: The choice of endoscopic resection technique, which depends on factors such as polyp shape, size, and location as well as endoscopist skill, is crucial for ensuring complete polyp removal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜治疗结直肠息肉及早期结直肠癌
背景:结肠镜检查比其他结直肠癌筛查方法具有更高的诊断敏感性,并且具有诊断组织取样和息肉切除的优势。由于大多数结直肠癌是由腺瘤性息肉演变而来,结肠镜下息肉切除术被广泛认为是预防结直肠癌和降低死亡率的有效方法。当前概念:确定结肠直肠息肉的大小和形状需要综合内镜检查和增强的成像技术来选择治疗方向和合适的结肠直肠息肉切除方法。根据美国结直肠癌多协会工作组和欧洲胃肠道内窥镜指南,息肉切除术方法的选择取决于息肉的属性和可能的恶性。本文研究了八种息肉切除术方法:冷钳息肉切除术、热活检息肉切除术、冷圈套息肉切除术、热圈套息肉切除术、内镜粘膜切除术(EMR)和改进的EMR技术。每种方法都有独特的好处,适合特定的息肉类型和大小。碎片式EMR和内镜下粘膜剥离为需要仔细规划和随访的较大或具有挑战性的病变提供了替代方案。在内镜下切除早期结直肠癌后,根据韩国和日本的指导方针,根据具体的组织学发现确定淋巴结转移的风险,可能需要进一步的手术。讨论与结论:根据息肉的形状、大小、位置等因素以及内镜医师的技能选择内镜切除技术是确保息肉完全切除的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The Korean Medical Association
Journal of The Korean Medical Association Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Korean Medical Association (JKMA) is the official peer-reviewed, open-access, monthly journal of the Korean Medical Association (KMA). It contains articles in Korean or English. Its abbreviated title is ''J Korean Med Assoc''. The aims of the Journal include contributing to the treatment of and preventing diseases of public health importance and to improvement of health and quality of life through sharing the state-of the-art scientific information on medicine by the members of KMA and other national and international societies.
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus complex pulmonary disease Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of scabies Current status of scabies in Korea Principles for effective management of scabies outbreaks Problems and improvements in the Medical Law’s excessive regulation of physicians in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1