Estimating Litter production amount and quality for Eldar pine and umbrella Elm trees in historic city of Yazd

Bahman Kiani, Samira Nasiri, Hamidreza Azimzadeh, Afagh Tabandeh, Mohammad Esmaeilpour
{"title":"Estimating Litter production amount and quality for Eldar pine and umbrella Elm trees in historic city of Yazd","authors":"Bahman Kiani, Samira Nasiri, Hamidreza Azimzadeh, Afagh Tabandeh, Mohammad Esmaeilpour","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3298599/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aimed to estimate the quantity and quality of litter produced by pine and elm trees in the green space of historic city of Yazd. Litterbags were used to collect the leaves during a year. For each species, amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, sulfur, carbon, magnesium, and potassium levels was measured monthly. The results showed that the annual mean weight of all components of litter was 4056.56 g for pine and 4106.67 g for elm trees. The greatest fall of pine needles was recorded in September. The highest fall of elm leaves was measured in November. The specific leaf area of ​​elm and pine was calculated to be 169.38 and 29.96 cm 2 /g, respectively. The leaf area index for pine and elm was 0.91 and 7.99, respectively. The results showed no statistically significant difference between pine and elm trees in the leaf amount and total litter. The crown area of ​​pine and elm trees, exhibited a direct effect on the amount of total litter produced. There was a significant difference between the two species in organic matter percentage, whereas there was no significant difference between them in the carbon, calcium, and magnesium content. Elm had a significantly lower C/N than pine. The specific leaf area of elm was higher than pine and it is better in this index. Although pines are evergreen, they produce a lot of litter during one year. Considering the planting spacing, which is usually 3×3 or 5×5 meters, the litter production is estimated to be 1.622 to 4.507 ton.ha − 1 for eldar pine and 1.642 to 4.562 ton.ha − 1 for umbrella elm trees respectively. Our results point out the need to revise the mixing ratio of conifers in plantations to reduce the litter collecting costs by Yazd municipality and increase the soil productivity.","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3298599/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to estimate the quantity and quality of litter produced by pine and elm trees in the green space of historic city of Yazd. Litterbags were used to collect the leaves during a year. For each species, amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, sulfur, carbon, magnesium, and potassium levels was measured monthly. The results showed that the annual mean weight of all components of litter was 4056.56 g for pine and 4106.67 g for elm trees. The greatest fall of pine needles was recorded in September. The highest fall of elm leaves was measured in November. The specific leaf area of ​​elm and pine was calculated to be 169.38 and 29.96 cm 2 /g, respectively. The leaf area index for pine and elm was 0.91 and 7.99, respectively. The results showed no statistically significant difference between pine and elm trees in the leaf amount and total litter. The crown area of ​​pine and elm trees, exhibited a direct effect on the amount of total litter produced. There was a significant difference between the two species in organic matter percentage, whereas there was no significant difference between them in the carbon, calcium, and magnesium content. Elm had a significantly lower C/N than pine. The specific leaf area of elm was higher than pine and it is better in this index. Although pines are evergreen, they produce a lot of litter during one year. Considering the planting spacing, which is usually 3×3 or 5×5 meters, the litter production is estimated to be 1.622 to 4.507 ton.ha − 1 for eldar pine and 1.642 to 4.562 ton.ha − 1 for umbrella elm trees respectively. Our results point out the need to revise the mixing ratio of conifers in plantations to reduce the litter collecting costs by Yazd municipality and increase the soil productivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史古城亚兹德榆木松和伞榆凋落物产量和质量估算
摘要本研究旨在估算亚兹德历史古城绿地中松树和榆树凋落物的数量和质量。在一年的时间里,垃圾袋被用来收集树叶。对每个物种,每月测量氮、磷、钙、硫、碳、镁和钾的含量。结果表明:松树凋落物各组分年平均质量为4056.56 g,榆树凋落物各组分年平均质量为4106.67 g;据记录,9月份的松针下降幅度最大。榆树落叶最多的时候是在11月。榆树和松木的比叶面积分别为169.38和29.96 cm 2 /g。松树和榆树的叶面积指数分别为0.91和7.99。结果表明,松树和榆树在落叶量和凋落物总量上差异无统计学意义。松树和榆树树冠面积对凋落物总量有直接影响。两种间有机质含量差异显著,而碳、钙、镁含量差异不显著。榆树的碳氮比显著低于松木。榆树比叶面积高于松木,比叶面积指标较好。虽然松树是常绿的,但它们在一年中会产生很多凋落物。考虑到种植间距通常为3×3或5×5米,估计凋落物产量为1.622 ~ 4.507吨。接骨木的Ha−1为1.642至4.562吨。伞榆Ha−1。我们的研究结果指出,为了降低亚兹德市收集凋落物的成本,提高土壤生产力,需要修改人工林中针叶树的混合比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Event Reduction in Localization of DES Supervisory Control Semantic Relational Extraction via Learning Syntactic Structural Representation Vehicle Tracking System using Sensor Fusion with Signal Loss Compensation Automotive Tracking System with Signal Lost Compensation Bridging the Gap: Assessing the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare for Improved Efficiency and Doctor Adaptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1