Simplicity is Complicated: On the Effort of Creating and Maintaining Equality

Q3 Social Sciences Suomen Antropologi Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI:10.30676/jfas.137823
Tuomas Tammisto
{"title":"Simplicity is Complicated: On the Effort of Creating and Maintaining Equality","authors":"Tuomas Tammisto","doi":"10.30676/jfas.137823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key point David Graeber and David Wengrow make in their mammoth work, The Dawn of Everything (2021), is that we humans are not by default redisposed to hierarchy or equality, but are first and foremost a socially creative species. In this essay, I take up Wengrow and Graeber’s notion that humans are ‘by default’ neither authoritarian nor egalitarian, but creative, noting that egalitarian forms of social organisation are complex, complicated, and require much work and effort. They are, in short, social and political achievements in their own right and manifestations of human social creativity. The work and effort that goes into an egalitarian social organisation is easily dismissed, and small-scale egalitarian societies, for example, are often referred to as ‘simple societies’ within popular discourse. In fact, during the launch of the Finnish translation of The Dawn of Everything in Helsinki on 23 March 2023, one of the panelists, a professor of global politics, insisted that societies have grown ‘more complex’ over time. This view has its parallel in the sphere of economics, such that commodity relations are viewed as the most sophisticated, elaborate, and complex forms of exchange, whilst modes such as sharing are viewed as the archaic baseline of exchange and, at worst, ‘simple’.","PeriodicalId":38391,"journal":{"name":"Suomen Antropologi","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suomen Antropologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30676/jfas.137823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key point David Graeber and David Wengrow make in their mammoth work, The Dawn of Everything (2021), is that we humans are not by default redisposed to hierarchy or equality, but are first and foremost a socially creative species. In this essay, I take up Wengrow and Graeber’s notion that humans are ‘by default’ neither authoritarian nor egalitarian, but creative, noting that egalitarian forms of social organisation are complex, complicated, and require much work and effort. They are, in short, social and political achievements in their own right and manifestations of human social creativity. The work and effort that goes into an egalitarian social organisation is easily dismissed, and small-scale egalitarian societies, for example, are often referred to as ‘simple societies’ within popular discourse. In fact, during the launch of the Finnish translation of The Dawn of Everything in Helsinki on 23 March 2023, one of the panelists, a professor of global politics, insisted that societies have grown ‘more complex’ over time. This view has its parallel in the sphere of economics, such that commodity relations are viewed as the most sophisticated, elaborate, and complex forms of exchange, whilst modes such as sharing are viewed as the archaic baseline of exchange and, at worst, ‘simple’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简单即复杂:论创造与维护平等的努力
大卫·格雷伯和大卫·温格罗在他们的巨著《万物的黎明》(2021)中提出的一个关键观点是,我们人类并不是默认的等级或平等,而是首先具有社会创造力的物种。在这篇文章中,我采用了温格罗和格雷伯的观点,即人类“默认”既不是专制主义,也不是平等主义,而是创造性的,并指出平等主义形式的社会组织是复杂的,复杂的,需要大量的工作和努力。简而言之,它们本身就是社会和政治成就,是人类社会创造力的表现。平等主义社会组织的工作和努力很容易被忽视,例如,小规模的平等主义社会在流行话语中经常被称为“简单社会”。事实上,2023年3月23日,在赫尔辛基举行的《万物黎明》芬兰语译本发布会上,一位全球政治学教授坚持认为,随着时间的推移,社会变得“更加复杂”。这种观点在经济学领域也有相似之处,比如商品关系被视为最复杂、最精细、最复杂的交换形式,而共享等模式被视为古老的交换基准,最坏的情况是“简单”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suomen Antropologi
Suomen Antropologi Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gamle og kommende numre English summaries Doktorens bord: Lækkende kroppes (u)muligheder Doktorens bord: Det smarte hjem fra teknologiske vision til den levede hverdag Interviewsamtale: Medicinsk Antropologi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1