Measurement of higher education students’ and teachers’ experiences in learning management systems: a scoping review

IF 4.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI:10.1080/02602938.2023.2266154
Patricia Simon, Juming Jiang, Luke K. Fryer
{"title":"Measurement of higher education students’ and teachers’ experiences in learning management systems: a scoping review","authors":"Patricia Simon, Juming Jiang, Luke K. Fryer","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2023.2266154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractLearning management systems (LMSs) have facilitated access to courses beyond conventional classroom environments via distance and asynchronous education. Although numerous studies have examined LMS usage in higher education institutions, review of scales measuring the LMS experience of both students and teachers remains scarce. This scoping review aimed to identify scales assessing student and teacher experiences with LMS, along with the attributes of studies employing these scales. The systematic search encompassed five databases, ultimately incorporating 79 of 5536 peer-reviewed articles in the final review. Findings revealed that included studies predominantly focused on student samples, with fewer examining teacher samples and even fewer involving both stakeholders. The majority of included studies created their own measurement, and over half of the newly created measurements were combined with constructs that were extracted from multiple theories. The System Usability Scale is the only measurement that has been used in multiple studies. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and DeLone and McLean’s Information Success (IS) model emerged as the most frequently employed frameworks for investigating factors influencing LMS utilization. Moodle ranked as the most commonly assessed LMS within the reviewed studies. Based on this data, recommendations for future LMS research are discussed.Keywords: Distance educationonline learningpost-secondary educationevaluation methodologies AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank the help and support from Miss. Yijin Li and Miss. Ying Su. This work could not be accomplished without their tireless hard work.Disclosure statementThere is no conflict of interest to declare.Notes on contributorsPatricia D. Simon is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Hong Kong. Her research interests include the promotion of students’ mental health, well-being and engagement in both physical and virtual classrooms. She is also interested in applying psychological principles for the improvement of educational technologies and for the promotion of environmental sustainability, health, and well-being.Juming Jiang is a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. His research programme focuses on how to support students’ learning motivation and interest in offline and online learning environments, with extended reality (i.e., virtual/augmented/mixed reality) and artificial intelligence technologies.Luke K. Fryer is an Associate Professor at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. His research programme addresses motivations to learn, learning strategies and teaching-learning on/off-line.","PeriodicalId":48267,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2266154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractLearning management systems (LMSs) have facilitated access to courses beyond conventional classroom environments via distance and asynchronous education. Although numerous studies have examined LMS usage in higher education institutions, review of scales measuring the LMS experience of both students and teachers remains scarce. This scoping review aimed to identify scales assessing student and teacher experiences with LMS, along with the attributes of studies employing these scales. The systematic search encompassed five databases, ultimately incorporating 79 of 5536 peer-reviewed articles in the final review. Findings revealed that included studies predominantly focused on student samples, with fewer examining teacher samples and even fewer involving both stakeholders. The majority of included studies created their own measurement, and over half of the newly created measurements were combined with constructs that were extracted from multiple theories. The System Usability Scale is the only measurement that has been used in multiple studies. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and DeLone and McLean’s Information Success (IS) model emerged as the most frequently employed frameworks for investigating factors influencing LMS utilization. Moodle ranked as the most commonly assessed LMS within the reviewed studies. Based on this data, recommendations for future LMS research are discussed.Keywords: Distance educationonline learningpost-secondary educationevaluation methodologies AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank the help and support from Miss. Yijin Li and Miss. Ying Su. This work could not be accomplished without their tireless hard work.Disclosure statementThere is no conflict of interest to declare.Notes on contributorsPatricia D. Simon is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Hong Kong. Her research interests include the promotion of students’ mental health, well-being and engagement in both physical and virtual classrooms. She is also interested in applying psychological principles for the improvement of educational technologies and for the promotion of environmental sustainability, health, and well-being.Juming Jiang is a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. His research programme focuses on how to support students’ learning motivation and interest in offline and online learning environments, with extended reality (i.e., virtual/augmented/mixed reality) and artificial intelligence technologies.Luke K. Fryer is an Associate Professor at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. His research programme addresses motivations to learn, learning strategies and teaching-learning on/off-line.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育学生和教师在学习管理系统中的经验测量:范围审查
摘要学习管理系统(lms)通过远程和异步教育促进了传统课堂环境之外的课程访问。尽管有许多研究调查了高等教育机构中LMS的使用情况,但对衡量学生和教师LMS体验的量表的审查仍然很少。本综述旨在确定评估学生和教师使用LMS经验的量表,以及使用这些量表的研究的属性。系统搜索包括5个数据库,最终将5536篇同行评议文章中的79篇纳入最终评审。调查结果显示,纳入的研究主要集中在学生样本上,较少检查教师样本,甚至更少涉及两个利益相关者。大多数纳入的研究创建了自己的测量方法,超过一半的新创建的测量方法与从多种理论中提取的结构相结合。系统可用性量表是唯一在多个研究中使用的测量方法。技术接受模型(TAM)和DeLone和McLean的信息成功模型(IS)是研究影响LMS利用的因素时最常用的框架。在回顾的研究中,Moodle被评为最常被评估的LMS。在此基础上,对未来LMS研究提出了建议。关键词:远程教育在线学习专上教育评价方法感谢李翊锦小姐和苏颖小姐的帮助和支持,这项工作的完成离不开她们的不懈努力。披露声明没有利益冲突需要申报。作者简介:patricia D. Simon是香港大学的博士后。她的研究兴趣包括促进学生的心理健康,福祉和参与物理和虚拟教室。她还对应用心理学原理改善教育技术和促进环境可持续性、健康和福祉感兴趣。蒋巨明,香港大学博士后研究员。他的研究项目侧重于如何通过扩展现实(即虚拟/增强/混合现实)和人工智能技术,在线下和在线学习环境中支持学生的学习动机和兴趣。Luke K. Fryer,香港大学副教授。他的研究项目涉及学习动机、学习策略和线上/线下教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
15.90%
发文量
70
期刊最新文献
‘There was very little room for me to be me’: the lived tensions between assessment standardisation and student diversity Perceptions of feedback and engagement with feedback among undergraduates: an educational identities approach Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality Diversity of pedagogical feedback designs: results from a scoping review of feedback research in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1