Intradiscal steroid therapy in chronic discogenic pain: a systematic review of literature

Priyanka Mishra, Sonal Goyal, Robina Makker
{"title":"Intradiscal steroid therapy in chronic discogenic pain: a systematic review of literature","authors":"Priyanka Mishra, Sonal Goyal, Robina Makker","doi":"10.5603/pmpi.a2023.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This article aims to conduct a systematic review of the present literature and assess the use of intra-discal steroids injection (IDSI) for patients suffering from chronic discogenic back pain irresponsive to conservative treatment. Methods: The search was conducted in PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases between 1990 and 2021. Included were studies assessing the administration of IDSI to adults suffering from chronic discogenic back pain. Studies evaluating combination interventions were excluded. The quality of evidence was determined by the GRADE assessment. The PROSPERO registration number for the review is CRD42022307690. Results: Eight studies enrolling a total of 548 patients were finally included in the systematic review. A significant reduction in pain scores after IDSI was calculated one month after intervention [standardized mean difference (SMD) −1.32 (−2.32, −0.31), p = 0.01, I2 = 89%]. This effect was not sustained at three- six- and twelve-month assessments. The analysis revealed no therapeutic benefit of intra-discal steroids for disability and activity limitation at one month, [SMD −0.76 (−1.88, 0.36), p = 0.18, I2 = 92%], three-, six- or twelve-months intervals. Overall, the quality of effect estimates was found to be moderate. Conclusions: The authors believe that Intradiscal steroid therapy can only be used as a bridge therapy for short-term pain relief while the patient with chronic discogenic pain awaits another intervention or surgery.","PeriodicalId":19965,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine in Practice","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/pmpi.a2023.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This article aims to conduct a systematic review of the present literature and assess the use of intra-discal steroids injection (IDSI) for patients suffering from chronic discogenic back pain irresponsive to conservative treatment. Methods: The search was conducted in PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases between 1990 and 2021. Included were studies assessing the administration of IDSI to adults suffering from chronic discogenic back pain. Studies evaluating combination interventions were excluded. The quality of evidence was determined by the GRADE assessment. The PROSPERO registration number for the review is CRD42022307690. Results: Eight studies enrolling a total of 548 patients were finally included in the systematic review. A significant reduction in pain scores after IDSI was calculated one month after intervention [standardized mean difference (SMD) −1.32 (−2.32, −0.31), p = 0.01, I2 = 89%]. This effect was not sustained at three- six- and twelve-month assessments. The analysis revealed no therapeutic benefit of intra-discal steroids for disability and activity limitation at one month, [SMD −0.76 (−1.88, 0.36), p = 0.18, I2 = 92%], three-, six- or twelve-months intervals. Overall, the quality of effect estimates was found to be moderate. Conclusions: The authors believe that Intradiscal steroid therapy can only be used as a bridge therapy for short-term pain relief while the patient with chronic discogenic pain awaits another intervention or surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎间盘内类固醇治疗慢性椎间盘源性疼痛:文献系统回顾
背景:本文旨在对现有文献进行系统回顾,并评估椎间盘内类固醇注射(IDSI)对保守治疗无反应的慢性椎间盘源性背痛患者的应用。方法:检索1990 - 2021年间的PubMed、PubMed Central、Cochrane、Scopus、Embase和Google Scholar数据库。包括评估IDSI对患有慢性椎间盘源性背痛的成年人的管理的研究。评估联合干预的研究被排除在外。证据质量由GRADE评估确定。审查的PROSPERO注册号为CRD42022307690。结果:8项研究共纳入548例患者,最终纳入系统评价。干预1个月后计算IDSI后疼痛评分显著降低[标准化平均差(SMD) - 1.32 (- 2.32, - 0.31), p = 0.01, I2 = 89%]。这种效果在3个月、6个月和12个月的评估中没有持续。分析显示椎间盘内类固醇治疗残疾和活动受限在1个月、3个月、6个月或12个月时没有任何疗效[SMD = - 0.76 (- 1.88, 0.36), p = 0.18, I2 = 92%]。总体而言,发现效果估计的质量是中等的。结论:作者认为,椎间盘内类固醇治疗只能作为短期缓解疼痛的桥梁治疗,而慢性椎间盘源性疼痛患者则需要另一种干预或手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine in Practice
Palliative Medicine in Practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and experiences about medical cannabis in palliative care patients and caregivers in Thailand: a qualitative study Effectiveness of an online educational intervention for pressure injury prevention in caregivers: a pre-test post-test study Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) in a Palliative care setting Unravelling the landscape of image-guided radiotherapy: a comprehensive overview Gastrostomies and clinical outcomes: a cohort of different enteral feeding techniques in advanced cancer palliative care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1