Using AI to Evaluate a Competency-Based Online Writing Course in Nursing

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Online Learning Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.24059/olj.v27i3.3974
Rebecca Red Wolf, Andrew Wolf
{"title":"Using AI to Evaluate a Competency-Based Online Writing Course in Nursing","authors":"Rebecca Red Wolf, Andrew Wolf","doi":"10.24059/olj.v27i3.3974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nursing education is transitioning from traditional teaching to competency-based education. Additionally, more nursing courses and programs are now offered online. Scholarly writing is a powerful strategy to teach effective communication and critical thinking, both core competencies for safe and effective nursing practice. However, teaching writing online to nursing students is challenging due to a lack of research evaluating best practices, faculty time constraints, and inconsistent writing assessment. Automated essay scoring systems using artificial intelligence (AI) provide new opportunities for efficient, reliable, and valid assessment of writing skills. We used a quasi-experimental design to investigate the impact of a 14-week fully online competency-based writing course on students’ self-efficacy, task value, and writing performance. The participants were master’s nursing students enrolled in an existing one-semester online competency-based writing course for healthcare professionals. An AI-powered writing assessment, IntelliMetric®, and the SAWSES self-efficacy survey were administered pre- and post-intervention. The results showed statistically significant gains in self-efficacy and writing performance with large effect sizes. This study addresses the gap in nursing education regarding the assessment of online, research-based writing interventions on students’ scholarly writing capacity. Recommendations include implementing a required scholarly writing course in all graduate-level nursing programs, scaffolding students’ competency development with the cognitive apprenticeship model, using best practices from composition research to inform online instruction, and employing AI-powered automated essay scoring to evaluate students’ writing progress and instructional efficacy.","PeriodicalId":54195,"journal":{"name":"Online Learning","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i3.3974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nursing education is transitioning from traditional teaching to competency-based education. Additionally, more nursing courses and programs are now offered online. Scholarly writing is a powerful strategy to teach effective communication and critical thinking, both core competencies for safe and effective nursing practice. However, teaching writing online to nursing students is challenging due to a lack of research evaluating best practices, faculty time constraints, and inconsistent writing assessment. Automated essay scoring systems using artificial intelligence (AI) provide new opportunities for efficient, reliable, and valid assessment of writing skills. We used a quasi-experimental design to investigate the impact of a 14-week fully online competency-based writing course on students’ self-efficacy, task value, and writing performance. The participants were master’s nursing students enrolled in an existing one-semester online competency-based writing course for healthcare professionals. An AI-powered writing assessment, IntelliMetric®, and the SAWSES self-efficacy survey were administered pre- and post-intervention. The results showed statistically significant gains in self-efficacy and writing performance with large effect sizes. This study addresses the gap in nursing education regarding the assessment of online, research-based writing interventions on students’ scholarly writing capacity. Recommendations include implementing a required scholarly writing course in all graduate-level nursing programs, scaffolding students’ competency development with the cognitive apprenticeship model, using best practices from composition research to inform online instruction, and employing AI-powered automated essay scoring to evaluate students’ writing progress and instructional efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用人工智能评估基于能力的护理在线写作课程
护理教育正从传统教学向能力教育转变。此外,现在有更多的护理课程和项目在网上提供。学术写作是教授有效沟通和批判性思维的有力策略,这两者都是安全和有效护理实践的核心能力。然而,由于缺乏评估最佳实践的研究,教师时间限制以及不一致的写作评估,对护理学生进行在线写作教学具有挑战性。使用人工智能(AI)的自动论文评分系统为高效、可靠和有效的写作技能评估提供了新的机会。我们采用准实验设计来调查为期14周的完全在线能力写作课程对学生自我效能感、任务价值和写作表现的影响。参与者为护理硕士学生,他们参加了一个为医疗保健专业人员开设的一学期在线能力写作课程。在干预前和干预后分别进行人工智能写作评估、IntelliMetric®和SAWSES自我效能调查。结果显示,自我效能感和写作表现在统计学上有显著提高,且效应量很大。本研究解决了护理教育中关于评估在线研究型写作干预对学生学术写作能力的差距。建议包括在所有研究生水平的护理课程中实施必修的学术写作课程,用认知学徒模式支撑学生的能力发展,使用作文研究的最佳实践来通知在线教学,以及使用人工智能驱动的自动论文评分来评估学生的写作进度和教学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Learning
Online Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emergent Themes from Study of a Highly Flexible Hybrid Learning Program Culturally- and Linguistically-Responsive Online Teacher Learning Professional Development "I Sing the Body Electric": Embodied Presence in the Community of Inquiry Framework Measuring Faculty Engagement in Online Formative or Whole-Person Education “But They’re Grad Students, They Should Know This”: Preliminary Findings from a Writing Center’s Hybrid Approach to Supporting Postgraduates in Qatar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1