Institutional Support for Academic Engagement in Online and Blended Learning Environments

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Online Learning Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.24059/olj.v27i3.4001
Charles R. Graham, Jered Borup, Sara Tuiloma, Adriana Martínez Arias, Diana María Parra Caicedo, Ross Larsen
{"title":"Institutional Support for Academic Engagement in Online and Blended Learning Environments","authors":"Charles R. Graham, Jered Borup, Sara Tuiloma, Adriana Martínez Arias, Diana María Parra Caicedo, Ross Larsen","doi":"10.24059/olj.v27i3.4001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In light of the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, leaders of higher education institutions around the world have been contemplating ways to help their universities engage in a digital transformation that must have student engagement and learning as the foremost considerations. This study reports on the work conducted at a university in Colombia that created an evaluation instrument based on the Academic Communities of Engagement (ACE) framework (Borup et al., 2020) to examine how well the institution was supporting the affective, behavioral, and cognitive (ABC) dimensions of engagement in its online and blended learning course offerings. This survey, the ACE in Higher Education (ACE-HE), measures indicators of the ABC engagement dimensions as well as indicators of institutional support for those elements. The survey was completed by 1,295 university students representing a broad demographic profile. Structural equation modeling found good fit for both the model of ABC engagement dimensions and the model of institutional support for ABC engagement dimensions. Institutional support for affective engagement showed strong relationships to affective, behavioral, and cognitive indicators of engagement, while institutional support for behavioral and cognitive engagement did not have the same outcome. This research provides access to both English and Spanish versions of the ACE-HE instrument. It also highlights ideas for institutions that want to improve their support for student ABC engagement dimensions in online and blended environments. Finally, several implications for making updates to the ACE framework are shared.","PeriodicalId":54195,"journal":{"name":"Online Learning","volume":"194 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i3.4001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In light of the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, leaders of higher education institutions around the world have been contemplating ways to help their universities engage in a digital transformation that must have student engagement and learning as the foremost considerations. This study reports on the work conducted at a university in Colombia that created an evaluation instrument based on the Academic Communities of Engagement (ACE) framework (Borup et al., 2020) to examine how well the institution was supporting the affective, behavioral, and cognitive (ABC) dimensions of engagement in its online and blended learning course offerings. This survey, the ACE in Higher Education (ACE-HE), measures indicators of the ABC engagement dimensions as well as indicators of institutional support for those elements. The survey was completed by 1,295 university students representing a broad demographic profile. Structural equation modeling found good fit for both the model of ABC engagement dimensions and the model of institutional support for ABC engagement dimensions. Institutional support for affective engagement showed strong relationships to affective, behavioral, and cognitive indicators of engagement, while institutional support for behavioral and cognitive engagement did not have the same outcome. This research provides access to both English and Spanish versions of the ACE-HE instrument. It also highlights ideas for institutions that want to improve their support for student ABC engagement dimensions in online and blended environments. Finally, several implications for making updates to the ACE framework are shared.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线和混合学习环境中学术参与的机构支持
鉴于2019冠状病毒病大流行造成的中断,世界各地高等教育机构的领导人一直在考虑如何帮助他们的大学进行数字化转型,这种转型必须以学生的参与和学习为首要考虑因素。本研究报告了哥伦比亚一所大学开展的工作,该大学基于学术参与社区(ACE)框架(Borup等人,2020年)创建了一个评估工具,以检查该机构在其在线和混合学习课程中对参与的情感、行为和认知(ABC)维度的支持程度。这项调查,即高等教育ACE (ACE- he),衡量了ABC参与维度的指标以及机构对这些要素的支持指标。这项调查是由1295名大学生完成的,他们代表了广泛的人口结构。结构方程模型对ABC投入维度模型和制度支持模型均具有较好的拟合性。对情感参与的制度支持与情感、行为和认知参与指标有很强的关系,而对行为和认知参与的制度支持则没有相同的结果。这项研究提供了英语和西班牙语版本的ACE-HE仪器。它还为那些希望在在线和混合环境中改善对学生ABC参与维度的支持的机构提供了一些建议。最后,分享了对ACE框架进行更新的几个含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Learning
Online Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emergent Themes from Study of a Highly Flexible Hybrid Learning Program Culturally- and Linguistically-Responsive Online Teacher Learning Professional Development "I Sing the Body Electric": Embodied Presence in the Community of Inquiry Framework Measuring Faculty Engagement in Online Formative or Whole-Person Education “But They’re Grad Students, They Should Know This”: Preliminary Findings from a Writing Center’s Hybrid Approach to Supporting Postgraduates in Qatar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1