Examining the Development of K-12 Students' Cognitive Presence Over Time

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Online Learning Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.24059/olj.v27i3.3481
Stefan Hrastinski, Stefan Stenbom, Mohammed Saqr, Malin Jansson, Olga Viberg
{"title":"Examining the Development of K-12 Students' Cognitive Presence Over Time","authors":"Stefan Hrastinski, Stefan Stenbom, Mohammed Saqr, Malin Jansson, Olga Viberg","doi":"10.24059/olj.v27i3.3481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we focus on the cognitive presence element of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. Cognitive presence consists of four categories: Triggering Event, Exploration, Integration, and Resolution. These categories have been described as phases following an idealized logical sequence, although the phases should not be seen as immutable. Few studies have empirically examined how the four categories develop over time during the inquiry process. This article uses learning analytics methods to study transitions between the categories in K-12 online mathematics tutoring. It was statistically most probable that the tutoring sessions started with Triggering Event (95%) and then transitioned to Exploration (51%). The transitions from Exploration to Integration (18%) and Integration to Resolution (21%) achieved statistical significance but were less likely. In fact, it was more likely that the tutoring sessions transitioned from Integration to Exploration (39%) and Resolution to Exploration (36%). In conclusion, the findings suggest that the idealized logical sequence is evident in the data but that other transitions occur as well; especially Exploration recurs throughout the sessions. It seems challenging for students to reach the Integration and Resolution categories. As the CoI framework is commonly adopted in practice, it is important that tutors and educators understand that the categories of cognitive presence will often not play out in idealized ways, underlining their role in supporting how the inquiry process unfolds. In order to gain an improved understanding of the inquiry process, future research is suggested to investigate how the presences and categories of the CoI framework develop over time in different educational settings.","PeriodicalId":54195,"journal":{"name":"Online Learning","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i3.3481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we focus on the cognitive presence element of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. Cognitive presence consists of four categories: Triggering Event, Exploration, Integration, and Resolution. These categories have been described as phases following an idealized logical sequence, although the phases should not be seen as immutable. Few studies have empirically examined how the four categories develop over time during the inquiry process. This article uses learning analytics methods to study transitions between the categories in K-12 online mathematics tutoring. It was statistically most probable that the tutoring sessions started with Triggering Event (95%) and then transitioned to Exploration (51%). The transitions from Exploration to Integration (18%) and Integration to Resolution (21%) achieved statistical significance but were less likely. In fact, it was more likely that the tutoring sessions transitioned from Integration to Exploration (39%) and Resolution to Exploration (36%). In conclusion, the findings suggest that the idealized logical sequence is evident in the data but that other transitions occur as well; especially Exploration recurs throughout the sessions. It seems challenging for students to reach the Integration and Resolution categories. As the CoI framework is commonly adopted in practice, it is important that tutors and educators understand that the categories of cognitive presence will often not play out in idealized ways, underlining their role in supporting how the inquiry process unfolds. In order to gain an improved understanding of the inquiry process, future research is suggested to investigate how the presences and categories of the CoI framework develop over time in different educational settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
K-12学生认知存在随时间发展的研究
在本文中,我们将重点关注探究社区(CoI)框架的认知存在元素。认知在场包括四类:触发事件、探索、整合和解决。这些类别被描述为遵循理想化逻辑顺序的阶段,尽管阶段不应该被视为不可变的。很少有研究实证地考察了这四个类别在调查过程中如何随着时间的推移而发展。本文运用学习分析的方法研究了中小学在线数学辅导中类别间的转换。从统计数据来看,辅导课程最可能从触发事件(95%)开始,然后过渡到探索(51%)。从探索到整合(18%)和整合到解决(21%)的转变达到了统计学意义,但可能性较小。事实上,辅导课程更有可能从整合过渡到探索(39%),从解决过渡到探索(36%)。总之,研究结果表明,理想化的逻辑序列在数据中是明显的,但其他过渡也会发生;特别是探索在整个过程中反复出现。对于学生来说,达到整合和解决类别似乎很有挑战性。由于CoI框架在实践中被普遍采用,重要的是,导师和教育工作者要明白,认知存在的类别通常不会以理想化的方式发挥作用,强调它们在支持探究过程如何展开方面的作用。为了更好地理解探究过程,未来的研究建议调查CoI框架的存在和类别在不同教育环境中如何随着时间的推移而发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Learning
Online Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emergent Themes from Study of a Highly Flexible Hybrid Learning Program Culturally- and Linguistically-Responsive Online Teacher Learning Professional Development "I Sing the Body Electric": Embodied Presence in the Community of Inquiry Framework Measuring Faculty Engagement in Online Formative or Whole-Person Education “But They’re Grad Students, They Should Know This”: Preliminary Findings from a Writing Center’s Hybrid Approach to Supporting Postgraduates in Qatar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1