Management and outcomes of chemotherapy-associated pneumoperitoneum in cancer patients: a scoping review protocol

Renee M. Maina, Caroline A. Rader, Jeevan Kypa, Hilary M. Jasmin, Constantine Asahngwa, Clarisse S. Muenyi, Denis A. Foretia
{"title":"Management and outcomes of chemotherapy-associated pneumoperitoneum in cancer patients: a scoping review protocol","authors":"Renee M. Maina, Caroline A. Rader, Jeevan Kypa, Hilary M. Jasmin, Constantine Asahngwa, Clarisse S. Muenyi, Denis A. Foretia","doi":"10.1097/sp9.0000000000000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pneumoperitoneum – free air within the peritoneal cavity – is often the result of bowel perforation, though other causes include residual postprocedural or postoperative air and barotrauma. In non-cancer patients, operative intervention is often required. Cancer patients, on the other hand, present a unique set of challenges as they usually have elevated risk of pneumoperitoneum from local radiation therapy, frequent endoscopic procedures, and tumor invasion. Factors such as malnutrition, neutropenia, chemotherapy, and steroid use make emergent surgery tenuous in cancer patients. There is a paucity of published literature on the management of pneumoperitoneum in patients actively undergoing chemotherapy. The main objective of this scoping review is to assess the presentation, management, and subsequent outcomes of this unique patient population. Materials and Methods: The authors will utilize the framework for performing scoping reviews as outlined by Arksey and O’Malley. They will perform the search for articles in three electronic databases (i.e. SCOPUS, PubMed, Embase) and relevant gray literature. Only articles available in English and published between 1999 and 2022 will be included. Inclusion criteria will be a known diagnosis of cancer, chemotherapy within 6 months of presentation, and imaging confirmation of pneumoperitoneum. Exclusion criteria will be cancer diagnosis at the time of presentation, perforation secondary to cancer itself, and chemotherapy greater than 6 months prior to presentation. A tailored extraction frame to extract relevant information from published articles that meet our inclusion criteria. The data using both descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of the main study questions. Ethics and Dissemination: Since the authors will not be collecting primary data, formal ethical approval is not required. They study findings will be disseminated through abstracts, conference presentations, and peer-reviewed publications.","PeriodicalId":42077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sp9.0000000000000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pneumoperitoneum – free air within the peritoneal cavity – is often the result of bowel perforation, though other causes include residual postprocedural or postoperative air and barotrauma. In non-cancer patients, operative intervention is often required. Cancer patients, on the other hand, present a unique set of challenges as they usually have elevated risk of pneumoperitoneum from local radiation therapy, frequent endoscopic procedures, and tumor invasion. Factors such as malnutrition, neutropenia, chemotherapy, and steroid use make emergent surgery tenuous in cancer patients. There is a paucity of published literature on the management of pneumoperitoneum in patients actively undergoing chemotherapy. The main objective of this scoping review is to assess the presentation, management, and subsequent outcomes of this unique patient population. Materials and Methods: The authors will utilize the framework for performing scoping reviews as outlined by Arksey and O’Malley. They will perform the search for articles in three electronic databases (i.e. SCOPUS, PubMed, Embase) and relevant gray literature. Only articles available in English and published between 1999 and 2022 will be included. Inclusion criteria will be a known diagnosis of cancer, chemotherapy within 6 months of presentation, and imaging confirmation of pneumoperitoneum. Exclusion criteria will be cancer diagnosis at the time of presentation, perforation secondary to cancer itself, and chemotherapy greater than 6 months prior to presentation. A tailored extraction frame to extract relevant information from published articles that meet our inclusion criteria. The data using both descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of the main study questions. Ethics and Dissemination: Since the authors will not be collecting primary data, formal ethical approval is not required. They study findings will be disseminated through abstracts, conference presentations, and peer-reviewed publications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者化疗相关气腹的管理和结果:一项范围审查方案
导语:气腹-腹膜腔内无空气-通常是肠穿孔的结果,尽管其他原因包括手术后或术后残留的空气和气压创伤。对于非癌症患者,通常需要手术干预。另一方面,癌症患者面临着一系列独特的挑战,因为他们通常因局部放射治疗、频繁的内窥镜手术和肿瘤侵袭而增加气腹的风险。营养不良、中性粒细胞减少、化疗和类固醇使用等因素使癌症患者的紧急手术变得脆弱。在积极接受化疗的患者中,关于气腹管理的已发表的文献很少。本综述的主要目的是评估这一独特患者群体的表现、管理和后续结果。材料和方法:作者将利用Arksey和O 'Malley概述的框架来执行范围审查。他们将在三个电子数据库(即SCOPUS, PubMed, Embase)和相关灰色文献中搜索文章。仅收录1999年至2022年间出版的英文文章。纳入标准将是已知的癌症诊断,出现后6个月内的化疗,以及气腹的影像学证实。排除标准将是出现时的癌症诊断,继发于癌症本身的穿孔,以及出现前6个月以上的化疗。定制的提取框架,从符合我们纳入标准的已发表文章中提取相关信息。数据采用描述性统计和专题分析两种主要研究问题。伦理与传播:由于作者不会收集原始数据,因此不需要正式的伦理批准。他们的研究结果将通过摘要、会议报告和同行评议的出版物传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: IJS Protocols is the first peer-reviewed, international, open access journal seeking to publish research protocols across across the full breadth of the surgical field. We are aim to provide rapid submission to decision times whilst maintaining a high quality peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer: a prospective cohort study Research protocol for an observational health data analysis to assess the applicability of randomized controlled trials focusing on newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer using real-world data: PIONEER IMI’s “big data for better outcomes” program Prophylactic slowly resorbable mesh in midline laparotomy to limit incisional hernia incidence: the prospective ‘Mesh Augmented Reinforcement of Abdominal Wall Suture Line (MARS)’ cohort study protocol Challenges during implant-assisted prosthetic rehabilitation in fibula reconstructed jaws and its management: a scoping review protocol The association of breast surgery ASPIRE: breast pain pathway rapid evaluation project - study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1