Use of handheld screens and language development - parents' perception and the construction of a guidance booklet

Carolina Felix Providello, Maria Cecília de Freitas Ferreira, Simone Rocha de Vasconcellos Hage
{"title":"Use of handheld screens and language development - parents' perception and the construction of a guidance booklet","authors":"Carolina Felix Providello, Maria Cecília de Freitas Ferreira, Simone Rocha de Vasconcellos Hage","doi":"10.1590/1982-0216/20232541923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: to describe the perception of parents about the use of handheld screens by children and to prepare a booklet for the healthy use of these devices. Methods: 102 parents of children aged between 18 and 71 months answered a questionnaire on the use of screen. The analysis was a descriptive and non-parametric one. After assessing parents’ responses and reviewing the literature, the booklet was prepared. The material was made available to three judges for analysis and suggestions. Results: the use of portable screens by children was confirmed by most respondents, and some children spend two hours or more in front of them. Parents believe that screens are a source of stimuli for learning how to speak, but they are concerned about the reproduction of some characters’ inappropriate behavior and consumerism. The judges answered the questionnaire assigning maximum scores to most questions. The text of the booklet gathered information about how children learn to speak, clarified about time and content of screen use, and presented language stimulation strategies. Conclusion: parents' responses to the questionnaire, together with a review of studies on the subject and the judges' analyses, provided elements for the preparation of a booklet on the proper use of these devices.","PeriodicalId":53238,"journal":{"name":"Revista CEFAC","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CEFAC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232541923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: to describe the perception of parents about the use of handheld screens by children and to prepare a booklet for the healthy use of these devices. Methods: 102 parents of children aged between 18 and 71 months answered a questionnaire on the use of screen. The analysis was a descriptive and non-parametric one. After assessing parents’ responses and reviewing the literature, the booklet was prepared. The material was made available to three judges for analysis and suggestions. Results: the use of portable screens by children was confirmed by most respondents, and some children spend two hours or more in front of them. Parents believe that screens are a source of stimuli for learning how to speak, but they are concerned about the reproduction of some characters’ inappropriate behavior and consumerism. The judges answered the questionnaire assigning maximum scores to most questions. The text of the booklet gathered information about how children learn to speak, clarified about time and content of screen use, and presented language stimulation strategies. Conclusion: parents' responses to the questionnaire, together with a review of studies on the subject and the judges' analyses, provided elements for the preparation of a booklet on the proper use of these devices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手持屏幕的使用与语言的发展——家长的看法和指导手册的编制
摘要目的:了解家长对儿童使用手持屏幕的看法,并为儿童健康使用这些设备准备一本小册子。方法:对102名18 ~ 71月龄儿童的家长进行问卷调查。分析是描述性和非参数性的。在评估了家长们的反应并回顾了相关文献之后,这本小册子就准备好了。这些材料已提供给三名法官进行分析和提出建议。结果:大多数被调查者确认儿童使用便携式屏幕,部分儿童在屏幕前使用时间超过2小时。家长认为屏幕是学习说话的刺激来源,但他们担心一些角色的不当行为和消费主义的再现。评委们回答了问卷,并对大多数问题给出了最高分。小册子的内容收集了儿童如何学习说话的信息,澄清了屏幕使用的时间和内容,并提出了语言刺激策略。结论:父母对调查表的答复,以及对这一主题的研究的审查和法官的分析,为编写一本关于正确使用这些装置的小册子提供了资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Contributions of urban planning for more food security in German cities]. Galvanic vestibular stimulation to improve postural instability, voluntary attention, and quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients Construction and validation of an informative handbook on speech-language-hearing therapy in primary health care Auditory middle latency responses and hearing skills in adults Electromyographic analysis of suprahyoid musculature before and after therapy taping in young women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1