The Voters You Select Affect the Representation You Get: Lessons from Ethnic Electoral Engineering

IF 1.2 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES Ethnopolitics Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI:10.1080/17449057.2023.2216979
Daniel Bochsler, Damir Kapidžić
{"title":"The Voters You Select Affect the Representation You Get: Lessons from Ethnic Electoral Engineering","authors":"Daniel Bochsler, Damir Kapidžić","doi":"10.1080/17449057.2023.2216979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Territorial and ethno-territorial institutions are used as tools of institutional engineering in divided societies. However, they also face major risks, as they might deepen and perpetuate societal divisions, deprive group members living dispersed from group representation, and prepare the grounds for new conflicts. Our comment embeds the four proposals put forward by Ivan Pepić in the debate, with a comparative perspective.","PeriodicalId":46452,"journal":{"name":"Ethnopolitics","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnopolitics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2023.2216979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Territorial and ethno-territorial institutions are used as tools of institutional engineering in divided societies. However, they also face major risks, as they might deepen and perpetuate societal divisions, deprive group members living dispersed from group representation, and prepare the grounds for new conflicts. Our comment embeds the four proposals put forward by Ivan Pepić in the debate, with a comparative perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你选择的选民影响你得到的代表:来自种族选举工程的教训
在分裂的社会中,领土制度和民族-领土制度被用作制度工程的工具。然而,它们也面临着重大风险,因为它们可能加深和延续社会分裂,剥夺分散生活的群体成员的群体代表性,并为新的冲突做好准备。我们的评论从比较的角度阐述了伊万·佩皮茨在辩论中提出的四项建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnopolitics
Ethnopolitics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Does Increasing Ethnic Diversity Reduce Electoral Turnout? The Case of New Zealand 1957–2020 Does the Interpretation of Self-determination Affect Autonomy Struggles in Asia? Deserving of Assistance: The Social Construction of Ukrainian Refugees Between Inclusion and Exclusion: The Representations of Illegal Immigrants and Refugees on Spanish Party VOX’s Instagram During the First Year of the War in Ukraine Indigenous People’s Self-governing Bodies and the Role of Civil Society: The Case of the Norwegian Sámi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1