Meryl C. Nath, Blake Frey, Joycelyn Atchison, Jessica A. Schmitt
{"title":"Disparities in Glycemic Outcomes Persist in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and High-Technology Use","authors":"Meryl C. Nath, Blake Frey, Joycelyn Atchison, Jessica A. Schmitt","doi":"10.1155/2023/6646582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Racial disparities are well described in glycemic outcomes in youth with Type 1 diabetes mellites (T1D). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has some limitations in comparing glycemia across patient groups as there are individual variations in mean glucose and HbA1c. Objective. This study aimed to compare glycemic metrics obtained from (Dexcom G6) continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device with HbA1c levels controlling for race, age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin pump use with glycemic control. Subjects and Methods. Data analyzed included 188 patients, majority non-Hispanic White (NHW) (n = 147, 78.2%) and majority privately insured (n = 147, 78.2%). Half of the patients were using insulin pumps, (n = 94, 50.0%) and approximately half were female. Median age was 16.6 (interquartile range: 14.2–18.2) years old with a median age of diabetes diagnosis at 9.3-years old. Results. Significant differences were observed between NHW and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients in terms of HbA1c, 90-day mean glucose, and 90-day time >250 mg/dL (>13.9 mmol/L) (7.6% vs. 9.2%, 181 mg/dL vs. 220 mg/dL, and 16.3% vs. 34.7%, respectively, <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M1\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> </math> for all comparisons). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to predict the influence of age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin administration on glycemic outcomes. Regression analysis revealed significant equations for all glycemic outcomes, demonstrating a strong correlation ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M2\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn> </math> , <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M3\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn> </math> , and <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M4\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn> </math> , respectively). However, after controlling for these variables, only race and duration of diabetes remained independently associated with glycemic outcomes, suggesting that these factors strongly influence glycemic control independent of age, sex, insurance, and pump use. Conclusion. Even in a subset of youth with T1D using CGM with high rates of insulin pump use, disparities in glycemic outcomes persist. When evaluating glycemic outcomes, race remained a significant cofactor despite controlling for age, duration of diabetes, sex, insurance status, and insulin administration type. These results add to the existing literature, and demonstrate race remains strong predictor of glycemic outcomes.","PeriodicalId":19797,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Diabetes","volume":"58 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6646582","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background. Racial disparities are well described in glycemic outcomes in youth with Type 1 diabetes mellites (T1D). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has some limitations in comparing glycemia across patient groups as there are individual variations in mean glucose and HbA1c. Objective. This study aimed to compare glycemic metrics obtained from (Dexcom G6) continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device with HbA1c levels controlling for race, age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin pump use with glycemic control. Subjects and Methods. Data analyzed included 188 patients, majority non-Hispanic White (NHW) (n = 147, 78.2%) and majority privately insured (n = 147, 78.2%). Half of the patients were using insulin pumps, (n = 94, 50.0%) and approximately half were female. Median age was 16.6 (interquartile range: 14.2–18.2) years old with a median age of diabetes diagnosis at 9.3-years old. Results. Significant differences were observed between NHW and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients in terms of HbA1c, 90-day mean glucose, and 90-day time >250 mg/dL (>13.9 mmol/L) (7.6% vs. 9.2%, 181 mg/dL vs. 220 mg/dL, and 16.3% vs. 34.7%, respectively, for all comparisons). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to predict the influence of age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin administration on glycemic outcomes. Regression analysis revealed significant equations for all glycemic outcomes, demonstrating a strong correlation ( , , and , respectively). However, after controlling for these variables, only race and duration of diabetes remained independently associated with glycemic outcomes, suggesting that these factors strongly influence glycemic control independent of age, sex, insurance, and pump use. Conclusion. Even in a subset of youth with T1D using CGM with high rates of insulin pump use, disparities in glycemic outcomes persist. When evaluating glycemic outcomes, race remained a significant cofactor despite controlling for age, duration of diabetes, sex, insurance status, and insulin administration type. These results add to the existing literature, and demonstrate race remains strong predictor of glycemic outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Diabetes is a bi-monthly journal devoted to disseminating new knowledge relating to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes in childhood and adolescence. The aim of the journal is to become the leading vehicle for international dissemination of research and practice relating to diabetes in youth. Papers are considered for publication based on the rigor of scientific approach, novelty, and importance for understanding mechanisms involved in the epidemiology and etiology of this disease, especially its molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects. Work relating to the clinical presentation, course, management and outcome of diabetes, including its physical and emotional sequelae, is considered. In vitro studies using animal or human tissues, whole animal and clinical studies in humans are also considered. The journal reviews full-length papers, preliminary communications with important new information, clinical reports, and reviews of major topics. Invited editorials, commentaries, and perspectives are a regular feature. The editors, based in the USA, Europe, and Australasia, maintain regular communications to assure rapid turnaround time of submitted manuscripts.