{"title":"Non-destructive triaxial vibroacoustic modal testing with a single sound transducer: a railway sleeper case study","authors":"Ferhat Çeçen, Bekir Aktaş, Ahmet Özbayrak","doi":"10.1080/10589759.2023.2273522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTVibrational experimental modal analysis (EMA) is among the most widely used modal parameter estimation techniques. However, it has several drawbacks, such as requiring accelerometer(s) mounting and using local measurements. Therefore, this study investigated whether vibroacoustic modal testing (VMT), a rarely studied method, would be a suitable alternative for EMA. In this context, a comparative case study was conducted on railway sleepers. First, modal parameter determination techniques in the literature were compared (time/frequency-domain, with/without normalisation, structural/acoustic excitation, and acoustic/vibrational response). Then, VMT and EMA test setups were reorganised considering the deficiencies identified in the literature. As a result, the difference between the VMT and EMA resonance frequency and damping ratios in the proposed mode shapes is determined as 0.06% and 3.46%, respectively. Consequently, this novel VMT setup using a single microphone that can take non-destructive, non-contact, and non-local (triaxial) measurements has been proven to provide reliable results and is recommended for future studies.KEYWORDS: Experimental modal analysisnon-destructive testingfield testingresonance frequency decrease diagnosticsdamping performance inspection AcknowledgmentsThis study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Department of Erciyes University (Project Number: FCD-2021-11483). The authors of this study express their gratitude to ERÜ/BAP for sponsoring the project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri, Erciyes Üniversitesi [FCD-2021-11483].","PeriodicalId":49746,"journal":{"name":"Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation","volume":"38 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2023.2273522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTVibrational experimental modal analysis (EMA) is among the most widely used modal parameter estimation techniques. However, it has several drawbacks, such as requiring accelerometer(s) mounting and using local measurements. Therefore, this study investigated whether vibroacoustic modal testing (VMT), a rarely studied method, would be a suitable alternative for EMA. In this context, a comparative case study was conducted on railway sleepers. First, modal parameter determination techniques in the literature were compared (time/frequency-domain, with/without normalisation, structural/acoustic excitation, and acoustic/vibrational response). Then, VMT and EMA test setups were reorganised considering the deficiencies identified in the literature. As a result, the difference between the VMT and EMA resonance frequency and damping ratios in the proposed mode shapes is determined as 0.06% and 3.46%, respectively. Consequently, this novel VMT setup using a single microphone that can take non-destructive, non-contact, and non-local (triaxial) measurements has been proven to provide reliable results and is recommended for future studies.KEYWORDS: Experimental modal analysisnon-destructive testingfield testingresonance frequency decrease diagnosticsdamping performance inspection AcknowledgmentsThis study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Department of Erciyes University (Project Number: FCD-2021-11483). The authors of this study express their gratitude to ERÜ/BAP for sponsoring the project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri, Erciyes Üniversitesi [FCD-2021-11483].
摘要振动实验模态分析(EMA)是应用最广泛的模态参数估计技术之一。然而,它有几个缺点,例如需要安装加速度计和使用本地测量。因此,本研究探讨了振动声模态测试(VMT)这一很少被研究的方法是否适合作为EMA的替代方法。在此背景下,对铁路枕木进行了比较案例研究。首先,比较了文献中的模态参数确定技术(时域/频域、有/没有归一化、结构/声学激励和声学/振动响应)。然后,考虑到文献中发现的缺陷,重新组织VMT和EMA测试设置。因此,在所提出的模态振型中,VMT和EMA共振频率和阻尼比的差异分别确定为0.06%和3.46%。因此,这种新颖的VMT设置使用单个麦克风,可以进行非破坏性,非接触式和非局部(三轴)测量,已被证明可以提供可靠的结果,并推荐用于未来的研究。关键词:实验模态分析;无损检测;现场检测;本研究的作者对ERÜ/BAP对该项目的赞助表示感谢。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri, Erciyes Üniversitesi [FCD-2021-11483]资助。
期刊介绍:
Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation publishes the results of research and development in the underlying theory, novel techniques and applications of nondestructive testing and evaluation in the form of letters, original papers and review articles.
Articles concerning both the investigation of physical processes and the development of mechanical processes and techniques are welcomed. Studies of conventional techniques, including radiography, ultrasound, eddy currents, magnetic properties and magnetic particle inspection, thermal imaging and dye penetrant, will be considered in addition to more advanced approaches using, for example, lasers, squid magnetometers, interferometers, synchrotron and neutron beams and Compton scattering.
Work on the development of conventional and novel transducers is particularly welcomed. In addition, articles are invited on general aspects of nondestructive testing and evaluation in education, training, validation and links with engineering.