Incorporating laparoscopic interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer-lessons learnt

Yael Naaman , Deborah Neesham , Antonia Jones , Rosemary McBain , Tom Cade , Orla McNally
{"title":"Incorporating laparoscopic interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer-lessons learnt","authors":"Yael Naaman ,&nbsp;Deborah Neesham ,&nbsp;Antonia Jones ,&nbsp;Rosemary McBain ,&nbsp;Tom Cade ,&nbsp;Orla McNally","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2023.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the utility of laparoscopy for interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study of interval CRS by laparoscopy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated at a single tertiary gynaecological cancer centre between October 2017 and September 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>86 patients had interval CRS by the laparoscopic route during the study period. The optimal cytoreduction rate (R ​&lt; ​1 ​cm) was 92%, and complete cytoreduction rate with no residual disease (R ​= ​0) was 35%. The intra-operative complication rate was 8% and the estimated blood loss (EBL) was 90 ​ml. The post-operative complication rate was 15%, mostly grade I-II, and the median length of hospital stay was 3 days.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For most patients with advanced ovarian cancer after NACT, laparoscopic interval CRS is feasible and effective in achieving optimal cytoreduction while providing a favourable peri-operative outcome. In some cases, however, recourse to laparotomy will optimise complete macroscopic resection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X2300020X/pdfft?md5=e679af68b402c7131a0392b47f71f5a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X2300020X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X2300020X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the utility of laparoscopy for interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of interval CRS by laparoscopy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated at a single tertiary gynaecological cancer centre between October 2017 and September 2020.

Results

86 patients had interval CRS by the laparoscopic route during the study period. The optimal cytoreduction rate (R ​< ​1 ​cm) was 92%, and complete cytoreduction rate with no residual disease (R ​= ​0) was 35%. The intra-operative complication rate was 8% and the estimated blood loss (EBL) was 90 ​ml. The post-operative complication rate was 15%, mostly grade I-II, and the median length of hospital stay was 3 days.

Conclusion

For most patients with advanced ovarian cancer after NACT, laparoscopic interval CRS is feasible and effective in achieving optimal cytoreduction while providing a favourable peri-operative outcome. In some cases, however, recourse to laparotomy will optimise complete macroscopic resection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合腹腔镜间隔期细胞减少手术治疗晚期卵巢癌
目的探讨腹腔镜在晚期卵巢癌新辅助化疗(NACT)后间歇细胞减缩手术(CRS)中的应用价值。方法对2017年10月至2020年9月在某三级妇科癌症中心接受治疗的晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者进行腹腔镜间歇CRS回顾性队列研究。结果86例患者在研究期间经腹腔镜行间歇CRS。最佳细胞减少率(R <1 cm)为92%,无残留病变的完全细胞减少率(R = 0)为35%。术中并发症发生率为8%,估计出血量(EBL)为90ml。术后并发症发生率为15%,多为I-II级,中位住院时间为3天。结论对于大多数晚期卵巢癌NACT术后患者,腹腔镜间歇CRS是可行有效的,可达到最佳的细胞减少效果,同时提供良好的围手术期预后。然而,在某些情况下,求助于剖腹手术将优化完全的宏观切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical frontiers in metastatic disease: Shaping cancer care Individualized surgical approach based on Bismuth-Corlette classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma Liquid biopsy for monitoring minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer: A promising approach with clinical implications Diagnostic sensitivity of immune-inflammatory cell proportion in early diagnosis of endometrial cancer Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1