Experience of drivers of all age groups in accepting autonomous vehicle technology

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1080/15472450.2023.2197115
{"title":"Experience of drivers of all age groups in accepting autonomous vehicle technology","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/15472450.2023.2197115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Autonomous vehicles (AVs) may benefit the health and safety of drivers across the driving lifespan, but perceptions of drivers are not known. Lived experiences of drivers exposed to AVs in combination with surveys, can more accurately reveal their perceptions. We quantified facilitators and barriers from data collected in older (N = 104) and younger drivers (N = 106). Perceptions were assessed via Autonomous Vehicle User Perception Survey (AVUPS) subscales (i.e., <em>intention to use</em>, <em>barriers</em>, <em>well-being</em>, and <em>acceptance</em>) pertaining to group exposure (simulator first [SF] or autonomous shuttle first [ASF]). We quantified the effects of group, time, and group × time interaction. Multiple linear regressions identified predictors (e.g., <em>optimism</em>, <em>ease of use</em>, <em>life space</em>, <em>driving exposure</em>, and <em>driving difficulty, age, gender, race)</em> of the AVUPS subscales. The regression analyses indicated that <em>optimism</em> and <em>ease of use</em> positively predicted <em>intention to use</em>, <em>barriers</em>, <em>well-being</em>, and the <em>total acceptance</em> score. <em>Driving difficulty</em> significantly predicted <em>barriers</em>, whereas <em>miles driven</em> negatively predicted <em>well-being.</em> The regression results indicated that predictors of user <em>acceptance</em> of AV technology included <em>age, race, optimism</em>, <em>ease of use,</em> with 33.6% of the variance in <em>acceptance</em> explained. The findings reveal foundational information about driver <em>acceptance</em>, <em>intention to use</em>, <em>barriers</em>, and <em>well-being</em> related to AVs. New knowledge pertains to how <em>demographics</em>, <em>optimism</em>, <em>ease of use</em>, <em>life space</em>, <em>driving exposure</em>, and <em>driving difficulty</em> inform AV acceptance. We provided strategies to inform city planners and other stakeholders on improving upon deployment practices of AVs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","volume":"28 5","pages":"Pages 651-667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1547245023000415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) may benefit the health and safety of drivers across the driving lifespan, but perceptions of drivers are not known. Lived experiences of drivers exposed to AVs in combination with surveys, can more accurately reveal their perceptions. We quantified facilitators and barriers from data collected in older (N = 104) and younger drivers (N = 106). Perceptions were assessed via Autonomous Vehicle User Perception Survey (AVUPS) subscales (i.e., intention to use, barriers, well-being, and acceptance) pertaining to group exposure (simulator first [SF] or autonomous shuttle first [ASF]). We quantified the effects of group, time, and group × time interaction. Multiple linear regressions identified predictors (e.g., optimism, ease of use, life space, driving exposure, and driving difficulty, age, gender, race) of the AVUPS subscales. The regression analyses indicated that optimism and ease of use positively predicted intention to use, barriers, well-being, and the total acceptance score. Driving difficulty significantly predicted barriers, whereas miles driven negatively predicted well-being. The regression results indicated that predictors of user acceptance of AV technology included age, race, optimism, ease of use, with 33.6% of the variance in acceptance explained. The findings reveal foundational information about driver acceptance, intention to use, barriers, and well-being related to AVs. New knowledge pertains to how demographics, optimism, ease of use, life space, driving exposure, and driving difficulty inform AV acceptance. We provided strategies to inform city planners and other stakeholders on improving upon deployment practices of AVs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各年龄段驾驶员接受自动驾驶汽车技术的经验
自动驾驶汽车(AVs)可能有利于驾驶员在整个驾驶过程中的健康和安全,但驾驶员的看法尚不清楚。将驾驶员接触自动驾驶汽车的生活经验与调查相结合,可以更准确地揭示他们的看法。我们通过收集老年驾驶员(104 人)和年轻驾驶员(106 人)的数据,对促进因素和障碍进行了量化。我们通过自主车辆用户感知调查(AVUPS)的子量表(即使用意向、障碍、幸福感和接受度)评估了与组别接触(模拟器优先[SF]或自主穿梭车优先[ASF])相关的感知。我们对组别、时间和组别 × 时间交互作用的影响进行了量化。多重线性回归确定了 AVUPS 分量表的预测因素(如乐观、易用性、生活空间、驾驶接触和驾驶难度、年龄、性别、种族)。回归分析表明,乐观情绪和易用性对使用意向、障碍、幸福感和接受总分有积极的预测作用。驾驶难度对障碍有明显的预测作用,而驾驶里程对幸福感有负面的预测作用。回归结果表明,用户对 AV 技术接受度的预测因素包括年龄、种族、乐观程度、易用性,其中 33.6% 的接受度变异得到了解释。研究结果揭示了有关驾驶员对自动驾驶汽车的接受程度、使用意向、障碍和幸福感的基础信息。新知识涉及人口统计学、乐观程度、易用性、生活空间、驾驶经验和驾驶难度如何影响对自动驾驶汽车的接受程度。我们为城市规划者和其他利益相关者提供了改进自动驾驶汽车部署实践的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems is devoted to scholarly research on the development, planning, management, operation and evaluation of intelligent transportation systems. Intelligent transportation systems are innovative solutions that address contemporary transportation problems. They are characterized by information, dynamic feedback and automation that allow people and goods to move efficiently. They encompass the full scope of information technologies used in transportation, including control, computation and communication, as well as the algorithms, databases, models and human interfaces. The emergence of these technologies as a new pathway for transportation is relatively new. The Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems is especially interested in research that leads to improved planning and operation of the transportation system through the application of new technologies. The journal is particularly interested in research that adds to the scientific understanding of the impacts that intelligent transportation systems can have on accessibility, congestion, pollution, safety, security, noise, and energy and resource consumption. The journal is inter-disciplinary, and accepts work from fields of engineering, economics, planning, policy, business and management, as well as any other disciplines that contribute to the scientific understanding of intelligent transportation systems. The journal is also multi-modal, and accepts work on intelligent transportation for all forms of ground, air and water transportation. Example topics include the role of information systems in transportation, traffic flow and control, vehicle control, routing and scheduling, traveler response to dynamic information, planning for ITS innovations, evaluations of ITS field operational tests, ITS deployment experiences, automated highway systems, vehicle control systems, diffusion of ITS, and tools/software for analysis of ITS.
期刊最新文献
Adaptive graph convolutional network-based short-term passenger flow prediction for metro Adaptive green split optimization for traffic control with low penetration rate trajectory data Inferring the number of vehicles between trajectory-observed vehicles Accurate detection of vehicle, pedestrian, cyclist and wheelchair from roadside light detection and ranging sensors Evaluating the impacts of vehicle-mounted Variable Message Signs on passing vehicles: implications for protecting roadside incident and service personnel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1