Who polarizes parliament? Partisan hostility in Norwegian legislative debates

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Party Politics Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1177/13540688231215003
Maiken Røed, Hanna Bäck, Royce Carroll
{"title":"Who polarizes parliament? Partisan hostility in Norwegian legislative debates","authors":"Maiken Røed, Hanna Bäck, Royce Carroll","doi":"10.1177/13540688231215003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many democratic societies, research has identified an increase in animosity between supporters of different political parties. While this phenomenon has been extensively examined among the general public, less research has explored the role of political elites in contributing to partisan hostility. This study aims to fill this research gap by analyzing instances where members of parliament (MPs) express negative sentiments toward representatives of opposing parties in legislative speeches. Specifically, we investigate which MPs within parties are driving elite rhetorical polarization. We hypothesize that MPs with less experience in parliament and less experience outside of party politics are more likely to contribute to polarizing speech due to stronger partisan identities. Analyzing Norwegian MPs’ speeches between 1998 and 2016, we find support for these hypotheses. Our findings highlight intra-party differences in polarization and contribute new insights into the characteristics that shape polarizing rhetoric among political elites.","PeriodicalId":48122,"journal":{"name":"Party Politics","volume":" 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Party Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231215003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many democratic societies, research has identified an increase in animosity between supporters of different political parties. While this phenomenon has been extensively examined among the general public, less research has explored the role of political elites in contributing to partisan hostility. This study aims to fill this research gap by analyzing instances where members of parliament (MPs) express negative sentiments toward representatives of opposing parties in legislative speeches. Specifically, we investigate which MPs within parties are driving elite rhetorical polarization. We hypothesize that MPs with less experience in parliament and less experience outside of party politics are more likely to contribute to polarizing speech due to stronger partisan identities. Analyzing Norwegian MPs’ speeches between 1998 and 2016, we find support for these hypotheses. Our findings highlight intra-party differences in polarization and contribute new insights into the characteristics that shape polarizing rhetoric among political elites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁使议会两极分化?挪威立法辩论中的党派敌意
研究发现,在许多民主社会中,不同政党支持者之间的敌意有所增加。虽然这一现象在普通公众中得到了广泛的研究,但很少有研究探讨政治精英在助长党派敌意方面的作用。本研究旨在通过分析国会议员在立法演讲中对反对党代表表达负面情绪的实例来填补这一研究空白。具体而言,我们调查了政党内哪些议员正在推动精英言论两极分化。我们假设,由于更强烈的党派认同,在议会中经验较少、在政党政治之外经验较少的议员更有可能发表两极分化的言论。通过分析1998年至2016年挪威国会议员的演讲,我们发现了对这些假设的支持。我们的研究结果突出了党派内部在两极分化方面的差异,并为政治精英中形成两极分化言论的特征提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Party Politics
Party Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Political parties are intrinsic to every democratic political system, and with the dramatic changes that regularly sweep the political landscape, the study of their function and form is one of the most dynamic areas within contemporary scholarship. Party Politics is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the study of this integral component within political science. This major international journal provides a forum for the analysis of political parties, including their historical development, structure, policy programmes, ideology, electoral and campaign strategies, and their role within the various national and international political systems of which they are a part.
期刊最新文献
Common sense, populism, and reactionary politics on Twitter: An analysis of populist far-right common sense narratives between 2008 and 2022 ‘Party position, electoral incentives, and attention to European Union issues in the 2019 European Parliament election’ Book Review: The closed partisan mind – A new psychology of American polarization Book Review: The Republican Evolution: From Governing Party to Antigovernment Party, 1860-2020 State government control and partisan happiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1