Telefonische triage door de Noodcentrale 112 versus fysieke triage op de spoedgevallendienst: een vergelijking

S. Beck, E. Ali, L. Wauters, K. Bronselaer, S. Verelst
{"title":"Telefonische triage door de Noodcentrale 112 versus fysieke triage op de spoedgevallendienst: een vergelijking","authors":"S. Beck, E. Ali, L. Wauters, K. Bronselaer, S. Verelst","doi":"10.47671/tvg.79.23.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Telephone triage by the 112 emergency center versus physical triage at the emergency department: a comparison Operators of the 112 emergency center (EC 112) use medical protocols to convert a request for help into a severity level and thus a specific resource. At the emergency department (ED), a physical triage is performed by the triage nurse. The primary goal was to compare the severity level assigned by EC 112 with the ED triage score. The secondary goal was to compare the activated medical protocol by EC 112 with the main complaint registered by the triage nurse. A retrospective cohort study was performed with data collected from the database of the EC 112 Flemish Brabant (Belgium) of all adult patients (≥ 18 years) referred to the ED of the University Hospital Leuven via the mobile urgency group (MUG), the paramedical intervention team (PIT) or the ambulance in 2019. A matched severity level determined by EC 112 was compared to an a priori matched emergency triage score. For the 5,519 included patients, the severity level assigned by EC 112 for the MUG, PIT and ambulance corresponded in respectively 91.5%, 86.7% and 53.9% of the cases with the severity level according to the ED triage score. For the MUG, PIT and ambulance, the activated medical protocol corresponded in respectively 60.9%, 62.1% and 58.8% of the cases with the main complaint registered by the triage nurse. This study showed a high degree of correspondence between the resources MUG and PIT sent out by the operators of EC 112 and the ED triage score. A higher PIT deployment may lead to time and efficiency gains.","PeriodicalId":23124,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde","volume":" 18","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47671/tvg.79.23.072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Telephone triage by the 112 emergency center versus physical triage at the emergency department: a comparison Operators of the 112 emergency center (EC 112) use medical protocols to convert a request for help into a severity level and thus a specific resource. At the emergency department (ED), a physical triage is performed by the triage nurse. The primary goal was to compare the severity level assigned by EC 112 with the ED triage score. The secondary goal was to compare the activated medical protocol by EC 112 with the main complaint registered by the triage nurse. A retrospective cohort study was performed with data collected from the database of the EC 112 Flemish Brabant (Belgium) of all adult patients (≥ 18 years) referred to the ED of the University Hospital Leuven via the mobile urgency group (MUG), the paramedical intervention team (PIT) or the ambulance in 2019. A matched severity level determined by EC 112 was compared to an a priori matched emergency triage score. For the 5,519 included patients, the severity level assigned by EC 112 for the MUG, PIT and ambulance corresponded in respectively 91.5%, 86.7% and 53.9% of the cases with the severity level according to the ED triage score. For the MUG, PIT and ambulance, the activated medical protocol corresponded in respectively 60.9%, 62.1% and 58.8% of the cases with the main complaint registered by the triage nurse. This study showed a high degree of correspondence between the resources MUG and PIT sent out by the operators of EC 112 and the ED triage score. A higher PIT deployment may lead to time and efficiency gains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧急电话分流112与紧急服务的物理分流:比较
112紧急中心的电话分诊与急诊科的物理分诊:比较112紧急中心(EC 112)的操作员使用医疗协议将求助请求转换为严重级别,从而转换为特定资源。在急诊科(ED),物理分诊由分诊护士进行。主要目的是比较EC 112分配的严重程度与急诊科分诊评分。第二个目标是比较EC 112激活的医疗方案与分诊护士登记的主要投诉。回顾性队列研究收集了2019年通过流动急救小组(MUG)、医疗辅助干预小组(PIT)或救护车转诊到鲁汶大学医院急诊科的所有成年患者(≥18岁)的EC 112弗拉芒布拉班特(比利时)数据库的数据。将EC 112确定的匹配严重程度与先验匹配的紧急分诊评分进行比较。在纳入的5519例患者中,EC 112分配给MUG、PIT和救护车的严重程度与急诊科分诊评分的严重程度对应率分别为91.5%、86.7%和53.9%。分诊护士登记主诉的病例中,有60.9%、62.1%和58.8%的病例对应于激活的医疗方案。本研究表明,EC 112操作员发出的资源MUG和PIT与急诊科分诊评分之间存在高度的对应关系。更高的PIT部署可能会带来时间和效率的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Begint het huisartsentekort bij de opleiding? Begint het huisartsentekort bij de opleiding? Een onderzoek naar het gebruik van de Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire als screeningstool voor obstructief slaapapneusyndroom bij kinderen met ADHD Een onderzoek naar het gebruik van de Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire als screeningstool voor obstructief slaapapneusyndroom bij kinderen met ADHD Methylfenidaat als behandeling voor hypersomnolentie als gevolg van een thalamusinfarct
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1