Becky Barton Sinclair, Christopher Sean Long, Susan Szabo, Gilbert Naizer
{"title":"Investigating Equitable Representation in K-8 Science Textbook Portrayal of Scientists","authors":"Becky Barton Sinclair, Christopher Sean Long, Susan Szabo, Gilbert Naizer","doi":"10.1007/s11191-023-00482-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study used the Draw-A-Scientist Test Checklist (DAST-C) to analyze and assess how scientists are portrayed in the illustrations found within two different prominent science textbook series used in Texas. Researchers reviewed 18 Kindergarten through eighth grade science textbooks in which 415 pages (<i>N</i>=8543 total), included images depicting scientists. The historical view of a scientist is of an elderly, Caucasian male working in a laboratory, who wears glasses, has white hair, is absent-minded and disorganized, wears a lab coat and works with laboratory instruments such as test tubes. However, this study noted that both scientist age and place of work changed. These positive results showed that the pictures of scientists are getting younger and that scientists work in a variety of places both indoors and outdoors. However, this study showed that most scientist pictures are primarily portrayed as Caucasian males. This indicates that the publishers of science textbooks are still using many stereotypical pictures of scientists, even though science standards are trying to encourage underrepresented ethnic minorities and females into science careers. This non-inclusive stance promotes non-equitable representation of scientists and negatively impacts minorities and females’ science self-efficacy and science identity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"34 3","pages":"1189 - 1202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-023-00482-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study used the Draw-A-Scientist Test Checklist (DAST-C) to analyze and assess how scientists are portrayed in the illustrations found within two different prominent science textbook series used in Texas. Researchers reviewed 18 Kindergarten through eighth grade science textbooks in which 415 pages (N=8543 total), included images depicting scientists. The historical view of a scientist is of an elderly, Caucasian male working in a laboratory, who wears glasses, has white hair, is absent-minded and disorganized, wears a lab coat and works with laboratory instruments such as test tubes. However, this study noted that both scientist age and place of work changed. These positive results showed that the pictures of scientists are getting younger and that scientists work in a variety of places both indoors and outdoors. However, this study showed that most scientist pictures are primarily portrayed as Caucasian males. This indicates that the publishers of science textbooks are still using many stereotypical pictures of scientists, even though science standards are trying to encourage underrepresented ethnic minorities and females into science careers. This non-inclusive stance promotes non-equitable representation of scientists and negatively impacts minorities and females’ science self-efficacy and science identity.
期刊介绍:
Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]