Comparison of Discrete Choice and Machine Learning Models for Simultaneous Modeling of Mobility Tool Ownership in Agent-Based Travel Demand Models

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Research Record Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1177/03611981231206175
Jasper Püschel, Lukas Barthelmes, Martin Kagerbauer, Peter Vortisch
{"title":"Comparison of Discrete Choice and Machine Learning Models for Simultaneous Modeling of Mobility Tool Ownership in Agent-Based Travel Demand Models","authors":"Jasper Püschel, Lukas Barthelmes, Martin Kagerbauer, Peter Vortisch","doi":"10.1177/03611981231206175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individual travel behavior, such as mode choice, is determined to a distinct degree by the respective portfolio of available mobility tools, such as the number of cars, public transit pass ownership, or a carsharing membership. However, the choice of different mobility tools is interdependent, and individuals weigh alternatives against each other. This process of parallel trade-offs is currently not reflected in typically used sequential logit models of agent-based travel demand models. This study fills this research gap by applying discrete choice and neural network models on a synthetic population to model multiple mobility tool ownership simultaneously. Using data from a national household travel survey, both model types approximated the given target distributions of mobility tools more accurately than the sequence of three corresponding logit models. Owing to its greater flexibility, the tested shallow and deep neural network exhibited higher predictive accuracy than simultaneous discrete choice models. The results indicated that neural networks with only one hidden layer were more robust and easier to formulate and interpret than deep networks with three hidden layers. Finally, the flat neural network was applied to a different synthetic population resulting in equally accurate results.","PeriodicalId":23279,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231206175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individual travel behavior, such as mode choice, is determined to a distinct degree by the respective portfolio of available mobility tools, such as the number of cars, public transit pass ownership, or a carsharing membership. However, the choice of different mobility tools is interdependent, and individuals weigh alternatives against each other. This process of parallel trade-offs is currently not reflected in typically used sequential logit models of agent-based travel demand models. This study fills this research gap by applying discrete choice and neural network models on a synthetic population to model multiple mobility tool ownership simultaneously. Using data from a national household travel survey, both model types approximated the given target distributions of mobility tools more accurately than the sequence of three corresponding logit models. Owing to its greater flexibility, the tested shallow and deep neural network exhibited higher predictive accuracy than simultaneous discrete choice models. The results indicated that neural networks with only one hidden layer were more robust and easier to formulate and interpret than deep networks with three hidden layers. Finally, the flat neural network was applied to a different synthetic population resulting in equally accurate results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于agent的出行需求模型中机动工具所有权同时建模的离散选择模型与机器学习模型的比较
个人出行行为,如出行方式的选择,在一定程度上取决于各自可用的出行工具组合,如汽车数量、公共交通通行证所有权或汽车共享会员资格。然而,不同移动工具的选择是相互依赖的,个人会权衡各种选择。这种并行权衡的过程目前没有反映在通常使用的基于代理的旅行需求模型的顺序logit模型中。本研究将离散选择和神经网络模型应用于合成人群,同时对多种移动工具所有权进行建模,填补了这一研究空白。使用来自全国家庭旅行调查的数据,这两种模型都比三种相应的logit模型的序列更准确地近似于给定的流动性工具的目标分布。由于其更大的灵活性,测试的浅层和深层神经网络表现出比同时离散选择模型更高的预测精度。结果表明,与具有三个隐藏层的深度网络相比,只有一个隐藏层的神经网络具有更强的鲁棒性,并且更易于制定和解释。最后,将平面神经网络应用于不同的合成种群,得到同样准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Record
Transportation Research Record 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
918
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board is one of the most cited and prolific transportation journals in the world, offering unparalleled depth and breadth in the coverage of transportation-related topics. The TRR publishes approximately 70 issues annually of outstanding, peer-reviewed papers presenting research findings in policy, planning, administration, economics and financing, operations, construction, design, maintenance, safety, and more, for all modes of transportation. This site provides electronic access to a full compilation of papers since the 1996 series.
期刊最新文献
Simulation Study of Pedestrians Evacuation Considering Aggressive Behavior Analyzing Freeway Safety Influencing Factors Using the CatBoost Model and Interpretable Machine-Learning Framework, SHAP Numerical Analysis of Error From Sampling of Alternatives in Logit-Based Demand Forecasting Models with Massive Choice Sets Bus Operation Safety Business Intelligence Solution: Applying Analytics for Key Performance Indicator, Investigation, and Targeted Actions Analyses with a Centralized Data Warehouse Energy-Efficient Train Operation Optimization in Istanbul Metro Network Considering Variable Passenger Numbers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1