How will AI text generation and processing impact sustainability reporting? Critical analysis, a conceptual framework and avenues for future research

IF 5.2 4区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1108/sampj-02-2023-0097
Charl de Villiers, Ruth Dimes, Matteo Molinari
{"title":"How will AI text generation and processing impact sustainability reporting? Critical analysis, a conceptual framework and avenues for future research","authors":"Charl de Villiers, Ruth Dimes, Matteo Molinari","doi":"10.1108/sampj-02-2023-0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The ability of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT to produce convincing, human-like text has major implications for the future of corporate reporting, including sustainability reporting. As the importance of sustainability reporting continues to grow, this study aims to critically analyse the benefits and pitfalls of automated text generation and processing. Design/methodology/approach This study develops a conceptual framework to delineate the field, assess the implications and form the basis for the generation of research questions. This study uses Alvesson and Deetz’s critical framework, considering insight (a review of literature and practice in the field), critique (consideration of the influences on the production and use of non-financial information and the implications for assurers of such information) and transformative redefinition (considering the implications of generative AI for sustainability reporting and proposing a research agenda). Findings This study highlights the implications of generative AI for sustainability accounting, reporting, assurance and report usage, including the risk of AI facilitating greenwashing, and the importance of more research on the use of AI for these matters. Practical implications The paper highlights to stakeholders the implications of AI for all aspects of sustainability reporting, including accounting, reporting, assurance and usage of reports. Social implications The implications of AI need to be understood in society, which this paper facilitates. Originality/value This study critically analyses the potential use of AI for sustainability reporting, construct a conceptual framework to delineate the field and develop a research agenda.","PeriodicalId":22143,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-02-2023-0097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The ability of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT to produce convincing, human-like text has major implications for the future of corporate reporting, including sustainability reporting. As the importance of sustainability reporting continues to grow, this study aims to critically analyse the benefits and pitfalls of automated text generation and processing. Design/methodology/approach This study develops a conceptual framework to delineate the field, assess the implications and form the basis for the generation of research questions. This study uses Alvesson and Deetz’s critical framework, considering insight (a review of literature and practice in the field), critique (consideration of the influences on the production and use of non-financial information and the implications for assurers of such information) and transformative redefinition (considering the implications of generative AI for sustainability reporting and proposing a research agenda). Findings This study highlights the implications of generative AI for sustainability accounting, reporting, assurance and report usage, including the risk of AI facilitating greenwashing, and the importance of more research on the use of AI for these matters. Practical implications The paper highlights to stakeholders the implications of AI for all aspects of sustainability reporting, including accounting, reporting, assurance and usage of reports. Social implications The implications of AI need to be understood in society, which this paper facilitates. Originality/value This study critically analyses the potential use of AI for sustainability reporting, construct a conceptual framework to delineate the field and develop a research agenda.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能文本生成和处理将如何影响可持续发展报告?批判性分析,一个概念框架和未来研究的途径
ChatGPT等生成式人工智能(AI)工具能够生成令人信服的、类似人类的文本,这对包括可持续发展报告在内的企业报告的未来具有重大影响。随着可持续发展报告的重要性不断增长,本研究旨在批判性地分析自动化文本生成和处理的好处和缺陷。设计/方法/方法本研究开发了一个概念性框架来描述该领域,评估其影响并形成产生研究问题的基础。本研究使用了Alvesson和Deetz的批判性框架,考虑了洞察力(对该领域的文献和实践的回顾)、批判(考虑对非财务信息的生产和使用的影响以及对此类信息的承保人的影响)和变革性重新定义(考虑生成人工智能对可持续发展报告的影响并提出研究议程)。本研究强调了生成式人工智能对可持续会计、报告、鉴证和报告使用的影响,包括人工智能促进“漂绿”的风险,以及对人工智能在这些问题上的应用进行更多研究的重要性。本文向利益相关者强调了人工智能对可持续发展报告各个方面的影响,包括会计、报告、保证和报告的使用。人工智能的影响需要在社会中被理解,这篇文章促进了这一点。原创性/价值本研究批判性地分析了人工智能在可持续发展报告中的潜在用途,构建了一个概念框架来描述该领域并制定了研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Investigating the barriers and strategies for establishing desalination plants to mitigate water scarcity in Sri Lankan dry zones Environmental sustainability balanced scorecard: a strategic map for joint action by municipalities Advancing fiscal transparency in Latin American countries: new findings in reports on tax sustainability in Chile Forward-looking information: does IIRC framework adoption matter? Environment court, shareholder conflict and corporate governance: evidence from market reactions to bank loan announcements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1