The separation distress hypothesis: The ultimate theory of depression?

Q3 Psychology Neuropsychoanalysis Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1080/15294145.2023.2262471
Paul B. Badcock, Karl J. Friston
{"title":"The separation distress hypothesis: The ultimate theory of depression?","authors":"Paul B. Badcock, Karl J. Friston","doi":"10.1080/15294145.2023.2262471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn his latest treatise on the separation distress hypothesis, Watt makes a compelling case that depression ultimately stems from an adaptive response to problems in the social world. Despite our agreement with many of Watt's claims, we argue here that the separation distress hypothesis only tells us part of the story. Finding little reason to favour his model over other socially-oriented theories of depression, we advocate instead for an integrative approach in theoretical psychiatry that can fruitfully incorporate insights arising from each of these evolutionary views, including Watt's own.KEYWORDS: Separation distress hypothesis; evolution; depression; active inference Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging: [Grant Number 205103/Z/16/Z]; and a Canada-UK Artificial Intelligence Initiative [Grant Number ES/T01279X/1].","PeriodicalId":39493,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychoanalysis","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2023.2262471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn his latest treatise on the separation distress hypothesis, Watt makes a compelling case that depression ultimately stems from an adaptive response to problems in the social world. Despite our agreement with many of Watt's claims, we argue here that the separation distress hypothesis only tells us part of the story. Finding little reason to favour his model over other socially-oriented theories of depression, we advocate instead for an integrative approach in theoretical psychiatry that can fruitfully incorporate insights arising from each of these evolutionary views, including Watt's own.KEYWORDS: Separation distress hypothesis; evolution; depression; active inference Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging: [Grant Number 205103/Z/16/Z]; and a Canada-UK Artificial Intelligence Initiative [Grant Number ES/T01279X/1].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分离痛苦假说:抑郁症的终极理论?
在他关于分离痛苦假说的最新论文中,瓦特提出了一个令人信服的案例,即抑郁症最终源于对社会问题的适应性反应。尽管我们同意瓦特的许多说法,但我们认为,分离痛苦假说只告诉了我们故事的一部分。没有什么理由支持他的模型胜过其他以社会为导向的抑郁症理论,我们主张在理论精神病学中采用一种综合方法,这种方法可以有效地结合来自每种进化观点的见解,包括瓦特自己的观点。关键词:分离苦恼假说;进化;抑郁症;公开声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由惠康人类神经成像中心资助:[批准号205103/Z/16/Z];和加拿大-英国人工智能计划[批准号ES/T01279X/1]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychoanalysis
Neuropsychoanalysis Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A psychological “how-possibly” model of repression Celebration of the 25th anniversary of Neuropsychoanalysis : Saturday, December 2, 2023 Reply to commentaries – the separation distress hypothesis of depression – an update and systematic review Freudian concepts in the twenty-first century: a neuropsychoanalytic update and discussion Abstracts from the 2023 NPSA Congress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1