FINANCIAL INCLUSION FOR SELECTED OECD COUNTRIES

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1758
Suat Teker, Dilek Teker, Halit Guzelsoy
{"title":"FINANCIAL INCLUSION FOR SELECTED OECD COUNTRIES","authors":"Suat Teker, Dilek Teker, Halit Guzelsoy","doi":"10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- Financial inclusion is defined as a process that ensures the ease of access, availability, and usage of the formal financial system for all members of an economy by emphasizing the use of accessibility and availability of financial services. A financial sector is measured and compared on four main features; debt is the size of financial institutions, access is the access and use of financial services by the users, efficiency is the efficiency in the provision of financial services, and stability is the stability in the provision of financial services. Financial inclusion, in short, is adults' access to and use of financial services. This study aims to measure the financial inclusion level for selected OECD countries from 2010-2021. Also, this study aims to estimate the effect of financial inclusion on economic growth and income inequality for selected countries. Methodology- The data used in this study cover a range of variables related to financial inclusion from various institutions, including the IMF-Financial Access Survey (IMF-FAS), the World Bank - World Development Indicators (WB-WDI), the World Bank - Global Financial Development Database (WB-GFDD) and the Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID). These variables provide insights into the dimensions and determinants of financial inclusion and their impact on economic and social outcomes for selected OECD countries. In the study, we run panel data regressions for each group separately, using GDP per capita as the dependent variable to determine the impact of the Financial Inclusion Index on economic growth. We also construct two different models for each group of countries with and without the added control variables into the models. Findings- The analysis reveals that the effect of financial inclusion on economic growth is negative for all groups of countries. The impact is significant for Group 1 and Group 2. The magnitude of coefficients changes when we add control variables to the model. However, it does not change the significance level of the coefficients. The magnitude of the coefficients increases as countries’ per capita income increases. At the same time, the effect of financial inclusion on the GINI index is significant only in the model for Group 3 with control variables. The sign of the impact is negative. It implies that the GINI index decreases as the financial inclusion index increases. So, the effect of financial inclusion on income inequality is positive for countries in Group 3. Conclusion- The empirical results did not support the relationship between financial inclusion and economic growth (GDP per capita). These results may be explained by advocating the financial sector's quick and fundamental digital transformation. Hence, the rules for availability, accessibility, and usage of financial products and system are completely changed in the past ten years. On the other hand, the relationship between financial inclusion and income inequality, measured by GINI Index, is consistent with the literature only for Group 3 countries (developing countries). The increase in the gap between rich-developed and developing countries may explain these results. An increase in financial inclusion still supports adjustments in income inequality in developing countries, but its effect is disappeared in developed countries in the last 12 years. Keywords: Financial inclusion, economic growth, OECD countries, financial indicators, income inequity. JEL Codes: G20, G21, G23","PeriodicalId":15124,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose- Financial inclusion is defined as a process that ensures the ease of access, availability, and usage of the formal financial system for all members of an economy by emphasizing the use of accessibility and availability of financial services. A financial sector is measured and compared on four main features; debt is the size of financial institutions, access is the access and use of financial services by the users, efficiency is the efficiency in the provision of financial services, and stability is the stability in the provision of financial services. Financial inclusion, in short, is adults' access to and use of financial services. This study aims to measure the financial inclusion level for selected OECD countries from 2010-2021. Also, this study aims to estimate the effect of financial inclusion on economic growth and income inequality for selected countries. Methodology- The data used in this study cover a range of variables related to financial inclusion from various institutions, including the IMF-Financial Access Survey (IMF-FAS), the World Bank - World Development Indicators (WB-WDI), the World Bank - Global Financial Development Database (WB-GFDD) and the Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID). These variables provide insights into the dimensions and determinants of financial inclusion and their impact on economic and social outcomes for selected OECD countries. In the study, we run panel data regressions for each group separately, using GDP per capita as the dependent variable to determine the impact of the Financial Inclusion Index on economic growth. We also construct two different models for each group of countries with and without the added control variables into the models. Findings- The analysis reveals that the effect of financial inclusion on economic growth is negative for all groups of countries. The impact is significant for Group 1 and Group 2. The magnitude of coefficients changes when we add control variables to the model. However, it does not change the significance level of the coefficients. The magnitude of the coefficients increases as countries’ per capita income increases. At the same time, the effect of financial inclusion on the GINI index is significant only in the model for Group 3 with control variables. The sign of the impact is negative. It implies that the GINI index decreases as the financial inclusion index increases. So, the effect of financial inclusion on income inequality is positive for countries in Group 3. Conclusion- The empirical results did not support the relationship between financial inclusion and economic growth (GDP per capita). These results may be explained by advocating the financial sector's quick and fundamental digital transformation. Hence, the rules for availability, accessibility, and usage of financial products and system are completely changed in the past ten years. On the other hand, the relationship between financial inclusion and income inequality, measured by GINI Index, is consistent with the literature only for Group 3 countries (developing countries). The increase in the gap between rich-developed and developing countries may explain these results. An increase in financial inclusion still supports adjustments in income inequality in developing countries, but its effect is disappeared in developed countries in the last 12 years. Keywords: Financial inclusion, economic growth, OECD countries, financial indicators, income inequity. JEL Codes: G20, G21, G23
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选定经合组织国家的金融包容性
目的-普惠金融被定义为通过强调金融服务的可及性和可用性,确保一个经济体的所有成员都能轻松获得、获得和使用正规金融体系的过程。衡量和比较金融部门的四个主要特征;债务是金融机构的规模,准入是用户对金融服务的获取和使用,效率是提供金融服务的效率,稳定性是提供金融服务的稳定性。简而言之,金融包容性是指成年人获得和使用金融服务。本研究旨在衡量2010-2021年选定的经合组织国家的金融包容性水平。此外,本研究旨在估计金融普惠对选定国家经济增长和收入不平等的影响。本研究使用的数据涵盖了来自不同机构的一系列与普惠金融相关的变量,包括国际货币基金组织-金融准入调查(IMF-FAS)、世界银行-世界发展指标(WB-WDI)、世界银行-全球金融发展数据库(WB-GFDD)和标准化世界收入不平等数据库(SWIID)。这些变量提供了对金融包容性的维度和决定因素及其对选定经合组织国家经济和社会结果的影响的见解。在研究中,我们分别对每一组进行面板数据回归,使用人均GDP作为因变量来确定普惠金融指数对经济增长的影响。我们还为每组国家构建了两个不同的模型,在模型中加入和不加入控制变量。研究结果-分析显示,普惠金融对经济增长的影响对所有类别的国家都是负面的。对第一组和第二组的影响是显著的。当我们向模型中加入控制变量时,系数的大小发生了变化。但是,它不会改变系数的显著性水平。系数的大小随着国家人均收入的增加而增加。同时,普惠金融对基尼指数的影响仅在具有控制变量的第3组模型中显著。这种影响的迹象是负面的。这意味着GINI指数随着普惠金融指数的增加而降低。因此,普惠金融对第三组国家收入不平等的影响是积极的。结论:实证结果不支持普惠金融与经济增长(人均GDP)之间的关系。这些结果可以通过倡导金融部门快速和根本性的数字化转型来解释。因此,金融产品和系统的可用性、可及性和使用规则在过去的十年中发生了彻底的变化。另一方面,用基尼指数衡量的普惠金融与收入不平等之间的关系仅在第三组国家(发展中国家)与文献一致。发达国家和发展中国家之间差距的扩大或许可以解释这些结果。普惠金融的增加仍然支持发展中国家调整收入不平等,但在过去12年里,其影响在发达国家已经消失。关键词:普惠金融,经济增长,经合组织国家,金融指标,收入不平等JEL代码:G20, G21, G23
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The meaning and practice of inclusion AMIDST gender diversity on boards of public sector organizations in Uganda COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TALENT MANAGEMENT AT THE LEVEL OF ACADEMIC STUDIES THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF BRAND LIKEABILITY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAND IMAGE AND CONSPICUOUS CONSUMPTION DETERMINATION OF NEW FLIGHT ROUTE WITH DEA METHOD IN AIRLINE OPERATIONS INVESTIGATION OF TURKIYE S PERSPECTIVE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BY COUNTRY WITH MULTIVARIABLE STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1