Drug‐facilitated sexual assault in Africa: A scoping review of empirical evidence

Jimoh Amzat, Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi, Kafayat Aminu, Eyinade Adeduntan Egbedina
{"title":"Drug‐facilitated sexual assault in Africa: A scoping review of empirical evidence","authors":"Jimoh Amzat, Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi, Kafayat Aminu, Eyinade Adeduntan Egbedina","doi":"10.1002/puh2.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Sexual assault has been a major social problem worldwide. Drug‐facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) is a form of sexual assault facilitated by psychoactive substances. DFSA is highly prevalent worldwide, though it is usually underreported. To understand the situation of DFSA in Africa, there is a need to map the available empirical evidence on DFSA in Africa. Hence, this scoping review was conducted to summarize the existing empirical knowledge and gaps in the literature and inform future research on DFSA in Africa. Methods This study adopted the design by the Arksey and O'Malley's guideline for scoping reviews. Without year limiters, literatures were retrieved through a systematic search of the 11 electronic databases using appropriate search terms and Boolean operators. The retrieved literatures were deduplicated and screened, using Rayyan, to identify eligible literature for inclusion into the review. Only those articles that met the eligibility criteria were included for data charting, collation, and summarization. Four articles were included in this review. Results Four articles were included in this review. The studies reported the characteristics of offenders and the context in which DFSA occurred. In the reviewed studies, rape of men was only reported among South Africans. Sedatives and alcohol are the most reported substances used in such rape. Perceptions of date rape, as documented by sexual assault survivors, suggest the pervasiveness of victim blaming. Typical DFSA cases appear opportunistic in nature, and an acquaintance is often the culprit. However, disaggregating DFSA as a specific sexual assault requires some logistics, including forensic and toxicological investigations. Conclusion DFSA is a significant dimension of gender‐based sexual violence. Infrastructure development should be improved to support systematic toxicological analyses and services to investigate and understand DFSA.","PeriodicalId":74613,"journal":{"name":"Public health challenges","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Sexual assault has been a major social problem worldwide. Drug‐facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) is a form of sexual assault facilitated by psychoactive substances. DFSA is highly prevalent worldwide, though it is usually underreported. To understand the situation of DFSA in Africa, there is a need to map the available empirical evidence on DFSA in Africa. Hence, this scoping review was conducted to summarize the existing empirical knowledge and gaps in the literature and inform future research on DFSA in Africa. Methods This study adopted the design by the Arksey and O'Malley's guideline for scoping reviews. Without year limiters, literatures were retrieved through a systematic search of the 11 electronic databases using appropriate search terms and Boolean operators. The retrieved literatures were deduplicated and screened, using Rayyan, to identify eligible literature for inclusion into the review. Only those articles that met the eligibility criteria were included for data charting, collation, and summarization. Four articles were included in this review. Results Four articles were included in this review. The studies reported the characteristics of offenders and the context in which DFSA occurred. In the reviewed studies, rape of men was only reported among South Africans. Sedatives and alcohol are the most reported substances used in such rape. Perceptions of date rape, as documented by sexual assault survivors, suggest the pervasiveness of victim blaming. Typical DFSA cases appear opportunistic in nature, and an acquaintance is often the culprit. However, disaggregating DFSA as a specific sexual assault requires some logistics, including forensic and toxicological investigations. Conclusion DFSA is a significant dimension of gender‐based sexual violence. Infrastructure development should be improved to support systematic toxicological analyses and services to investigate and understand DFSA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲毒品促成的性侵犯:经验证据的范围审查
性侵犯已成为世界性的重大社会问题。药物促进性侵犯(DFSA)是一种由精神活性物质促进的性侵犯形式。DFSA在世界范围内非常普遍,尽管它通常被低估。为了了解非洲粮食和农业服务的情况,有必要对非洲粮食和农业服务的现有经验证据进行绘制。因此,本文进行了范围审查,以总结现有的经验知识和文献中的空白,并为非洲DFSA的未来研究提供信息。方法本研究采用Arksey和O'Malley指南设计的范围评价。在没有年份限制的情况下,通过使用适当的检索词和布尔运算符对11个电子数据库进行系统检索检索文献。使用Rayyan对检索到的文献进行去重复和筛选,以确定符合条件的文献纳入综述。只有那些符合资格标准的文章被纳入数据图表、整理和总结。本综述纳入了四篇文章。结果共纳入4篇文献。这些研究报告了罪犯的特征和DFSA发生的背景。在审查的研究中,只有南非人报告了强奸男子的情况。据报道,在这种强奸中使用最多的是镇静剂和酒精。根据性侵幸存者的记录,对约会强奸的看法表明,普遍存在着对受害者的指责。典型的DFSA案例在本质上表现为机会主义,而熟人往往是罪魁祸首。然而,将DFSA分解为特定的性侵犯需要一些后勤保障,包括法医和毒理学调查。结论DFSA是基于性别的性暴力的一个重要维度。应改善基础设施建设,以支持系统的毒理学分析和服务,以调查和了解DFSA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sugar‐Sweetened Beverages Taxation Plan in Indonesia: Call for Political Commitment Prevention and Management of Multimorbidity in Southeast Asia: A Narrative Review Contraceptive Counselling and Uptake Among Female Kidney Transplant Recipients in Ethiopia Dietary Diversity and Nutritional Status Among Rwandan Women Engaged in Agriculture: A Cross‐Sectional Study Improving Sustainable Financing for Universal Health Coverage in Bhutan: Exploring Policy Options and Financial Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1