Spatio‐Temporal Variation in the Bid–Rent Functions of Long‐Term and Short‐Term Rentals: Evidence from South‐East Queensland, Australia

IF 2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie Pub Date : 2023-09-17 DOI:10.1111/tesg.12588
T. Sigler, Z. Zou, J. Corcoran, E. Charles‐Edwards
{"title":"Spatio‐Temporal Variation in the Bid–Rent Functions of Long‐Term and Short‐Term Rentals: Evidence from South‐East Queensland, Australia","authors":"T. Sigler, Z. Zou, J. Corcoran, E. Charles‐Edwards","doi":"10.1111/tesg.12588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Platform‐mediated short‐term rentals (STRs) are a relatively new addition to the housing landscape, providing accommodation on a temporal scale that falls between hotel stays and long‐term rentals (LTRs). Given the potential for STR hosts to charge significantly higher nightly rates for the same property than they might through an LTR lease enumerated in months or years, many have asked whether a ‘gap’ exists between the two, and how persistent this may be over space and time. In this paper, we modify and validate classical bid–rent theory to investigate spatial variation in the rent gap between STRs and LTRs over time in two distinct contexts in Queensland, Australia. We conduct statistical analyses on STR data against LTR data from local property records in Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast, identifying a significant rent gap, particularly close to high‐amenity areas. We find strong evidence of distance decay in the rent gap, with rents converging with increasing distance in most cases, indicating that STRs only ‘outcompete’ LTRs near high‐amenity areas, which in this analysis are the central business districts (Brisbane) and the beach (Sunshine Coast). We also find that the rent gap increases as properties get larger in size, and over time. These findings carry implications for policy aiming to balance the needs of multiple stakeholders and political agendas against planning frameworks prescribing where short‐term accommodation is best situated.","PeriodicalId":23136,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Platform‐mediated short‐term rentals (STRs) are a relatively new addition to the housing landscape, providing accommodation on a temporal scale that falls between hotel stays and long‐term rentals (LTRs). Given the potential for STR hosts to charge significantly higher nightly rates for the same property than they might through an LTR lease enumerated in months or years, many have asked whether a ‘gap’ exists between the two, and how persistent this may be over space and time. In this paper, we modify and validate classical bid–rent theory to investigate spatial variation in the rent gap between STRs and LTRs over time in two distinct contexts in Queensland, Australia. We conduct statistical analyses on STR data against LTR data from local property records in Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast, identifying a significant rent gap, particularly close to high‐amenity areas. We find strong evidence of distance decay in the rent gap, with rents converging with increasing distance in most cases, indicating that STRs only ‘outcompete’ LTRs near high‐amenity areas, which in this analysis are the central business districts (Brisbane) and the beach (Sunshine Coast). We also find that the rent gap increases as properties get larger in size, and over time. These findings carry implications for policy aiming to balance the needs of multiple stakeholders and political agendas against planning frameworks prescribing where short‐term accommodation is best situated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期和短期租金竞价-租金函数的时空变化:来自澳大利亚昆士兰东南部的证据
平台中介短期租赁(STRs)是一个相对较新的住房景观,提供住宿的时间尺度介于酒店住宿和长期租赁(lts)之间。考虑到STR房东可能会对同一处房产收取比长期租赁(按月或年计算)高得多的每晚房价,许多人都在问,两者之间是否存在“差距”,以及这种差距在空间和时间上可能持续多久。在本文中,我们修正并验证了经典的竞价租金理论,在澳大利亚昆士兰州的两种不同背景下,研究了STRs和ltr之间租金差距的空间变化。我们对来自布里斯班和阳光海岸当地房产记录的STR数据和LTR数据进行了统计分析,确定了显著的租金差距,特别是在高舒适区附近。我们在租金差距中发现了距离衰减的有力证据,在大多数情况下,租金随着距离的增加而收敛,这表明str仅在高舒适区域附近“竞争”ltr,在本分析中,这些区域是中央商务区(布里斯班)和海滩(阳光海岸)。我们还发现,租金差距随着房产规模的扩大和时间的推移而扩大。这些发现对旨在平衡多个利益相关者的需求和政治议程与规划框架之间的政策产生了影响,这些规划框架规定了短期住宿的最佳位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie is a leading international journal on contemporary issues in human geography, committed to promoting rigorous academic work on the field. Through its scholarly articles and special "dossiers" on topics of interest, it brings you the latest research findings from Europe and around the world in authoritative scientific contributions. The journal bridges the gap between continental European practices of geography and the Anglo-American traditions by including articles from both regions. The Tijdschrift is a channel for the dissemination of new perspectives, ideas and approaches to the study of human geography.
期刊最新文献
Homeless Clients' Circulation in Emergency Care: Rethinking Poverty Governance as Urban Impasse A Billion‐Euro Industry? (De‐)territorialisation Processes of Norway's Seaweed Farming Assemblage Closing the Rent Index Gap – A Quantitative Approach to Rental‐Sector Gentrification São Paulo's Crackland as Urban Impasse: An Ethnographic Account of Mobility, Territory and Viracao as Form of Nomadism Who Cashed the Rent Gap? An Alternative Narration of a Shantytown Renovation Project in Nanjing, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1