Statistical Age-of-Information Bounds for Parallel Systems: When Do Independent Channels Make a Difference?

Markus Fidler;Jaya Prakash Champati;Joerg Widmer;Mahsa Noroozi
{"title":"Statistical Age-of-Information Bounds for Parallel Systems: When Do Independent Channels Make a Difference?","authors":"Markus Fidler;Jaya Prakash Champati;Joerg Widmer;Mahsa Noroozi","doi":"10.1109/JSAIT.2023.3328766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper contributes tail bounds of the age-of-information of a general class of parallel systems and explores their potential. Parallel systems arise in relevant cases, such as in multi-band mobile networks, multi-technology wireless access, or multi-path protocols, just to name a few. Typically, control over each communication channel is limited and random service outages and congestion cause buffering that impairs the age-of-information. The parallel use of independent channels promises a remedy, since outages on one channel may be compensated for by another. Surprisingly, for the well-known case of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\text{M}\\mid \\text{M}\\mid 1$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n queues we find the opposite: pooling capacity in one channel performs better than a parallel system with the same total capacity. A generalization is not possible since there are no solutions for other types of parallel queues at hand. In this work, we prove a dual representation of age-of-information in min-plus algebra that connects to queueing models known from the theory of effective bandwidth/capacity and the stochastic network calculus. Exploiting these methods, we derive tail bounds of the age-of-information of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\text{G}\\mid \\text{G}\\mid 1$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n queues. Tail bounds of the age-of-information of independent parallel queues follow readily. In addition to parallel classical queues, we investigate Markov channels where, depending on the memory of the channel, we show the true advantage of parallel systems. We continue to investigate this new finding and provide insight into when capacity should be pooled in one channel or when independent parallel channels perform better. We complement our analysis with simulation results and evaluate different update policies, scheduling policies, and the use of heterogeneous channels that is most relevant for latest multi-band networks.","PeriodicalId":73295,"journal":{"name":"IEEE journal on selected areas in information theory","volume":"4 ","pages":"591-606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10302220","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE journal on selected areas in information theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10302220/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper contributes tail bounds of the age-of-information of a general class of parallel systems and explores their potential. Parallel systems arise in relevant cases, such as in multi-band mobile networks, multi-technology wireless access, or multi-path protocols, just to name a few. Typically, control over each communication channel is limited and random service outages and congestion cause buffering that impairs the age-of-information. The parallel use of independent channels promises a remedy, since outages on one channel may be compensated for by another. Surprisingly, for the well-known case of $\text{M}\mid \text{M}\mid 1$ queues we find the opposite: pooling capacity in one channel performs better than a parallel system with the same total capacity. A generalization is not possible since there are no solutions for other types of parallel queues at hand. In this work, we prove a dual representation of age-of-information in min-plus algebra that connects to queueing models known from the theory of effective bandwidth/capacity and the stochastic network calculus. Exploiting these methods, we derive tail bounds of the age-of-information of $\text{G}\mid \text{G}\mid 1$ queues. Tail bounds of the age-of-information of independent parallel queues follow readily. In addition to parallel classical queues, we investigate Markov channels where, depending on the memory of the channel, we show the true advantage of parallel systems. We continue to investigate this new finding and provide insight into when capacity should be pooled in one channel or when independent parallel channels perform better. We complement our analysis with simulation results and evaluate different update policies, scheduling policies, and the use of heterogeneous channels that is most relevant for latest multi-band networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并行系统的统计信息年龄界限:独立通道何时起作用?
本文给出了一类一般并行系统的信息年龄的尾界,并探讨了它们的潜力。并行系统出现在相关情况下,例如在多频段移动网络、多技术无线接入或多路径协议中,仅举几例。通常,对每个通信通道的控制是有限的,随机的服务中断和拥塞会导致缓冲,从而损害信息的年龄。独立通道的并行使用提供了一种补救措施,因为一个通道的中断可以由另一个通道补偿。令人惊讶的是,对于众所周知的M|M|1队列,我们发现了相反的情况:一个通道中的池化容量比具有相同总容量的并行系统表现得更好。泛化是不可能的,因为手头没有其他类型的并行队列的解决方案。在这项工作中,我们证明了最小加代数中信息年龄的对偶表示,该表示连接到从有效带宽/容量理论和随机网络演算中已知的排队模型。利用这些方法,我们得到了G|G|1队列信息年龄的尾界。独立并行队列的信息年龄的尾界很容易出现。除了并行的经典队列,我们还研究了马尔可夫通道,根据通道的内存,我们展示了并行系统的真正优势。我们将继续研究这一新发现,并深入了解何时应该将容量集中在一个通道中,或者何时独立的并行通道性能更好。我们用仿真结果补充了我们的分析,并评估了与最新多频段网络最相关的不同更新策略、调度策略和异构信道的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Source Coding for Markov Sources With Partial Memoryless Side Information at the Decoder Deviation From Maximal Entanglement for Mid-Spectrum Eigenstates of Local Hamiltonians Statistical Inference With Limited Memory: A Survey Tightening Continuity Bounds for Entropies and Bounds on Quantum Capacities Dynamic Group Testing to Control and Monitor Disease Progression in a Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1