Chemical analysis of the state of Ukrainian soils in the combat zone

International Journal of Environmental Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1080/00207233.2023.2271754

Birzhan Biyashev, Antonina Drobitko, Nataliia Markova, Alla Bondar, Oleg Pismenniy

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTEven in peacetime, bad farming practices have degraded the soil but war has exacerbated the situation. To support comprehensive land rehabilitation, publicly available data are scrutinised to establish the composition of soils under shelling, bombing, missile strikes and pollution by fuels and lubricants. These data show that the content of various toxic substances exceeds permissible limits several-fold, and soil acidity is increased. Heavy contamination with fuels and lubricants changes the soil’s chemical and physical properties, killing all but the most resilient flora and fauna.KEYWORDS: Soil degradationtoxic substancesheavy metalsreclamation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

战区乌克兰土壤的化学分析

即使在和平时期，不良的耕作方式也使土壤退化，而战争使情况更加恶化。为了支持全面的土地恢复，对公开的数据进行了仔细审查，以确定在炮击、轰炸、导弹袭击和燃料和润滑油污染下土壤的组成。这些数据表明，各种有毒物质的含量超过允许的限度数倍，土壤酸度增加。燃料和润滑油的严重污染改变了土壤的化学和物理性质，除了最具弹性的动植物外，所有植物和动物都被杀死了。关键词:土壤退化;有毒物质;重金属;

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Environmental Studies Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

121

期刊介绍： For more than 45 years, the International Journal of Environmental Studies has been pre-eminent in its field. The environment is understood to comprise the natural and the man-made, and their interactions; including such matters as pollution, health effects, analytical methods, political approaches, social impacts etc. Papers favouring an interdisciplinary approach are preferred, because the evidence of more than 45 years appears to be that many intellectual tools and many causes and effects are at issue in any environmental problem - and its solution. This does not mean that a single focus or a narrow view is unwelcome; provided always that the evidence is indicated and the method is robust. Pragmatic decision-making and applicable policies are subjects of interest, together with the problems in establishing facts about dynamic systems where long periods of observation and precise measurement may be difficult to secure. In other words, a systems or holistic approach to the environment and a scientific analysis are complementary, and the distinction between ’hard’ and ’soft’ science is bridged in most of the papers published. These may be on any item in the agenda of environmental science: land, water, food, conservation, population, risk analysis, energy, economics of ecological and non-ecological approaches, social advocacy of arguments for change, legal measures, implications of urbanism, energy choices, waste disposal, recycling, transport systems and other issues of mass society. There is concern also for marginal areas, under-developed societies, minorities, species loss; and indeed no element of the subject of environmental studies, seen in an international and interactive mode, is excluded.