Ayushi Kurian, Kanda Naveen Babu, Narayanan Ayyappan
{"title":"Structural diversity is a key driver of above-ground biomass in tropical forests","authors":"Ayushi Kurian, Kanda Naveen Babu, Narayanan Ayyappan","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2023.2277282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground A gamut of abiotic and biotic factors is related to the amount of above-ground biomass (AGB) produced in ecosystems. Some factors have direct and others indirect relationships with AGB. Detailed analyses in tropical forests are few but much needed for better understanding the potential impacts of global change drivers and for mitigating impacts.Aims Here, we examined the relationship between AGB and different predictor variables and quantitatively evaluated their relative importance in lowland to lower montane deciduous and lower montane – montane evergreen forest types. We hypothesised that the relationship between AGB and climate, topography, structural diversity, species diversity (alpha and beta) and phylogenetic diversity would differ between the two forest types.Methods We inventoried trees from 114 plots (each 0.1 ha) and used partial least square (PLS) structural equation modelling (SEM) to test the direct and indirect relationship between AGB and the predictor variables.Results We found that structural diversity variables, stem density and tree girth, were significantly and positively related to AGB in both forest types, displaying a stronger relationship in montane evergreen forests (w = 0.65 for density and 0.89 for tree girth). In the deciduous forest, alpha and phylogenetic diversity were also important factors, whereas beta and phylogenetic diversity were important in the evergreen forest. The effects of topography and climate varied between forest types, with elevation and precipitation being related to AGB directly and indirectly through their relationship with structural diversity.Conclusion Our results suggest that structural diversity is a key driver of tropical forest biomass, both directly and indirectly. This fundamental understanding can aid in the predictive efforts of biodiversity conservation and forest management.Policy highlightsStructural diversity affects biomass, directly and indirectly facilitating the importance of monitoring and land-use planning.A structurally diversified forest can be considered while selecting reserves for conservation.Prioritizing the preservation and improvement of structural diversity in forests is crucial.Assessing forest productivity requires considering stand characteristics and biodiversity.KEYWORDS: Climatedeciduous forestevergreen foresttree diversityWestern ghatsDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. Declaration of competing interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.AcknowledgementsWe thank the Karnataka Forest Department for providing the necessary permissions and assistance for the fieldwork. We also express sincere gratitude to all the anonymous reviewers and the Editor- in-Chief for their valuable comments, which contributed to improving the quality of the paper.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology and Department of Space, Government of India (Grant no.-BT/Cood.II/10/02/2016), as a part of a project ‘Biodiversity characterization at community level in India using Earth observation data’.","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":"56 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2023.2277282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTBackground A gamut of abiotic and biotic factors is related to the amount of above-ground biomass (AGB) produced in ecosystems. Some factors have direct and others indirect relationships with AGB. Detailed analyses in tropical forests are few but much needed for better understanding the potential impacts of global change drivers and for mitigating impacts.Aims Here, we examined the relationship between AGB and different predictor variables and quantitatively evaluated their relative importance in lowland to lower montane deciduous and lower montane – montane evergreen forest types. We hypothesised that the relationship between AGB and climate, topography, structural diversity, species diversity (alpha and beta) and phylogenetic diversity would differ between the two forest types.Methods We inventoried trees from 114 plots (each 0.1 ha) and used partial least square (PLS) structural equation modelling (SEM) to test the direct and indirect relationship between AGB and the predictor variables.Results We found that structural diversity variables, stem density and tree girth, were significantly and positively related to AGB in both forest types, displaying a stronger relationship in montane evergreen forests (w = 0.65 for density and 0.89 for tree girth). In the deciduous forest, alpha and phylogenetic diversity were also important factors, whereas beta and phylogenetic diversity were important in the evergreen forest. The effects of topography and climate varied between forest types, with elevation and precipitation being related to AGB directly and indirectly through their relationship with structural diversity.Conclusion Our results suggest that structural diversity is a key driver of tropical forest biomass, both directly and indirectly. This fundamental understanding can aid in the predictive efforts of biodiversity conservation and forest management.Policy highlightsStructural diversity affects biomass, directly and indirectly facilitating the importance of monitoring and land-use planning.A structurally diversified forest can be considered while selecting reserves for conservation.Prioritizing the preservation and improvement of structural diversity in forests is crucial.Assessing forest productivity requires considering stand characteristics and biodiversity.KEYWORDS: Climatedeciduous forestevergreen foresttree diversityWestern ghatsDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. Declaration of competing interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.AcknowledgementsWe thank the Karnataka Forest Department for providing the necessary permissions and assistance for the fieldwork. We also express sincere gratitude to all the anonymous reviewers and the Editor- in-Chief for their valuable comments, which contributed to improving the quality of the paper.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology and Department of Space, Government of India (Grant no.-BT/Cood.II/10/02/2016), as a part of a project ‘Biodiversity characterization at community level in India using Earth observation data’.
期刊介绍:
Plant Ecology and Diversity is an international journal for communicating results and novel ideas in plant science, in print and on-line, six times a year. All areas of plant biology relating to ecology, evolution and diversity are of interest, including those which explicitly deal with today''s highly topical themes, such as biodiversity, conservation and global change. We consider submissions that address fundamental questions which are pertinent to contemporary plant science. Articles concerning extreme environments world-wide are particularly welcome.
Plant Ecology and Diversity considers for publication original research articles, short communications, reviews, and scientific correspondence that explore thought-provoking ideas.
To aid redressing ‘publication bias’ the journal is unique in reporting, in the form of short communications, ‘negative results’ and ‘repeat experiments’ that test ecological theories experimentally, in theoretically flawless and methodologically sound papers. Research reviews and method papers, are also encouraged.
Plant Ecology & Diversity publishes high-quality and topical research that demonstrates solid scholarship. As such, the journal does not publish purely descriptive papers. Submissions are required to focus on research topics that are broad in their scope and thus provide new insights and contribute to theory. The original research should address clear hypotheses that test theory or questions and offer new insights on topics of interest to an international readership.