What does the performance appraisal approach tell us about the organizational culture's basic assumptions?

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Employee Relations Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1108/er-04-2023-0221
Batia Ben-Hador
{"title":"What does the performance appraisal approach tell us about the organizational culture's basic assumptions?","authors":"Batia Ben-Hador","doi":"10.1108/er-04-2023-0221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Performance appraisal (PA) is an organizational practice whose ultimate goal is to improve employee performance. This goal can be achieved using two approaches: the administrative approach, which emphasizes materialistic incentives and rewards excellent performers, and the developmental approach, which focuses on employee personal and professional development. The literature points out that organizations cannot utilize both approaches at the same time, but the reason for this is vague. Therefore, the research purpose is to bridge this gap by exploring the basic assumptions behind the administrative and developmental PA approaches as part of the hidden layers of organizational culture. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative document analysis (QDA) was used to analyze 124 Israeli organizations' PA forms and employee reports. Findings The organization's PA approaches were diagnosed as a first step in revealing the reason for the inability to use both approaches simultaneously. In the next step, it was revealed that organizational culture assumptions are the reason for the contradiction of the PA approaches. Eventually, McGregor's theory X is the basic assumption behind the administrative approach, and theory Y is the assumption behind the developmental approach. Since these two approaches contradict each other, it explains the difficulty of using both approaches simultaneously. Originality/value This study dives into the hidden levels of organizational culture and attempts to bridge a long-standing but still current research gap, as well as extend and refine organizational culture and performance appraisal theories.","PeriodicalId":47857,"journal":{"name":"Employee Relations","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/er-04-2023-0221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Performance appraisal (PA) is an organizational practice whose ultimate goal is to improve employee performance. This goal can be achieved using two approaches: the administrative approach, which emphasizes materialistic incentives and rewards excellent performers, and the developmental approach, which focuses on employee personal and professional development. The literature points out that organizations cannot utilize both approaches at the same time, but the reason for this is vague. Therefore, the research purpose is to bridge this gap by exploring the basic assumptions behind the administrative and developmental PA approaches as part of the hidden layers of organizational culture. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative document analysis (QDA) was used to analyze 124 Israeli organizations' PA forms and employee reports. Findings The organization's PA approaches were diagnosed as a first step in revealing the reason for the inability to use both approaches simultaneously. In the next step, it was revealed that organizational culture assumptions are the reason for the contradiction of the PA approaches. Eventually, McGregor's theory X is the basic assumption behind the administrative approach, and theory Y is the assumption behind the developmental approach. Since these two approaches contradict each other, it explains the difficulty of using both approaches simultaneously. Originality/value This study dives into the hidden levels of organizational culture and attempts to bridge a long-standing but still current research gap, as well as extend and refine organizational culture and performance appraisal theories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于组织文化的基本假设,绩效评估方法告诉了我们什么?
绩效评估(PA)是一种组织实践,其最终目标是提高员工的绩效。这一目标可以通过两种方法来实现:行政方法,强调物质激励和奖励优秀的表现者;发展方法,侧重于员工的个人和专业发展。文献指出,组织不能同时利用这两种方法,但原因是模糊的。因此,研究的目的是通过探索行政和发展PA方法背后的基本假设来弥补这一差距,这些方法是组织文化隐藏层的一部分。设计/方法/方法采用定性文件分析(QDA)来分析124个以色列组织的PA表格和员工报告。该组织的PA方法被诊断为揭示无法同时使用两种方法的原因的第一步。在接下来的步骤中,揭示了组织文化假设是PA方法矛盾的原因。最后,麦格雷戈的X理论是行政方法背后的基本假设,Y理论是发展方法背后的假设。由于这两种方法相互矛盾,这就解释了同时使用这两种方法的困难。原创性/价值本研究深入到组织文化的隐藏层面,试图弥合一个长期存在但仍然存在的研究空白,并扩展和完善组织文化和绩效评估理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Employee Relations
Employee Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.80%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: ■Communication, participation and involvement ■Developments in collective bargaining ■Equal opportunities ■Health and safety ■HRM ■Industrial relations and employment protection law ■Industrial relations management and reform ■Organizational change and people ■Personnel and recruitment ■Quality of working life
期刊最新文献
Exploring ambidextrous human resource management and employee performance through the lens of managers’ ambidextrous orientation and individual ambidexterity Talent management practices and the influence of their use on employee outcomes via perceived career growth Beyond liberalization: employers’ organizations’ varied responses to employment law Pay information and employees’ perception of organizational support: the mediating role of pay satisfaction E-work self-efficacy and innovative behaviour: a moderated mediation analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1