Oral Toxicities Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Meta-Analyses of Clinical Trials

Akanksha Srivastava, Graciela M. Nogueras-Gonzalez, Yimin Geng, Jasdev Singh, Jeffrey N. Myers, Yisheng Li, Mark S. Chambers
{"title":"Oral Toxicities Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Meta-Analyses of Clinical Trials","authors":"Akanksha Srivastava, Graciela M. Nogueras-Gonzalez, Yimin Geng, Jasdev Singh, Jeffrey N. Myers, Yisheng Li, Mark S. Chambers","doi":"10.36401/jipo-23-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment; however, their oral toxicity profile is not well elucidated. This review aimed to investigate the prevalence of oral toxicities including xerostomia, mucositis/stomatitis, dysgeusia, dysphagia, oral/oropharyngeal pain, oral infections, angular cheilitis, osteonecrosis, osteomyelitis, and oral mucosal reactions with ICIs. Methods A review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023391674). A systematic search of ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted as of April 10, 2022. Studies were selected, assessed, and data extracted using PRISMA guidelines. Oral toxicity data were extracted from study arms using a single immunotherapy drug. Meta-analyses were conducted to summarize prevalence of oral toxicities using random-effects models. Results Of 750 screened records, 95 trials were included in the meta-analysis with published results. Time between study completion and first publication on ClinicalTrials.gov was 1 to 146 months (mean = 20.3, SD = 18.4). Weighted pooled prevalence was 5% (95% CI: 4–6%) for xerostomia, 3% (95% CI: 3–4%) for mucositis/stomatitis, 3% (95% CI: 2–3%) for dysgeusia, 2% (95% CI: 1–2%) for dysphagia, 3% (95% CI: 2–4%) for oropharyngeal/oral pain, 2% (95% CI: 1–3%) for oral candidiasis, and 2% (95% CI: 0–4%) for angular cheilitis. Subgroup differences based on ICI drugs were minimal. No trials reported lichenoid or pemphigoid mucosal reactions. Discussion Meta-analysis results revealed low prevalence of oral toxicities with ICIs; however, data reporting was limited and inconsistent. Limitations of study dataset reveal a significant need for systematic collection of oral morbidity data as well as improved consistency and compliance of reporting results on ClinicalTrials.gov.","PeriodicalId":16081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology","volume":" 13","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/jipo-23-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment; however, their oral toxicity profile is not well elucidated. This review aimed to investigate the prevalence of oral toxicities including xerostomia, mucositis/stomatitis, dysgeusia, dysphagia, oral/oropharyngeal pain, oral infections, angular cheilitis, osteonecrosis, osteomyelitis, and oral mucosal reactions with ICIs. Methods A review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023391674). A systematic search of ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted as of April 10, 2022. Studies were selected, assessed, and data extracted using PRISMA guidelines. Oral toxicity data were extracted from study arms using a single immunotherapy drug. Meta-analyses were conducted to summarize prevalence of oral toxicities using random-effects models. Results Of 750 screened records, 95 trials were included in the meta-analysis with published results. Time between study completion and first publication on ClinicalTrials.gov was 1 to 146 months (mean = 20.3, SD = 18.4). Weighted pooled prevalence was 5% (95% CI: 4–6%) for xerostomia, 3% (95% CI: 3–4%) for mucositis/stomatitis, 3% (95% CI: 2–3%) for dysgeusia, 2% (95% CI: 1–2%) for dysphagia, 3% (95% CI: 2–4%) for oropharyngeal/oral pain, 2% (95% CI: 1–3%) for oral candidiasis, and 2% (95% CI: 0–4%) for angular cheilitis. Subgroup differences based on ICI drugs were minimal. No trials reported lichenoid or pemphigoid mucosal reactions. Discussion Meta-analysis results revealed low prevalence of oral toxicities with ICIs; however, data reporting was limited and inconsistent. Limitations of study dataset reveal a significant need for systematic collection of oral morbidity data as well as improved consistency and compliance of reporting results on ClinicalTrials.gov.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与免疫检查点抑制剂相关的口服毒性:临床试验的荟萃分析
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已经彻底改变了癌症治疗;然而,它们的口服毒性还没有很好地阐明。本综述旨在调查口腔毒性的患病率,包括口干症、粘膜炎/口炎、吞咽困难、口腔/口咽疼痛、口腔感染、角性口炎、骨坏死、骨髓炎和ICIs的口腔黏膜反应。方法在PROSPERO注册(ID: CRD42023391674)。截至2022年4月10日,对ClinicalTrials.gov进行了系统搜索。采用PRISMA指南对研究进行选择、评估和数据提取。口服毒性数据从使用单一免疫治疗药物的研究组中提取。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析以总结口服毒性的流行情况。在750份筛选记录中,95项试验被纳入meta分析,并发表了结果。从研究完成到首次发表在ClinicalTrials.gov上的时间为1至146个月(mean = 20.3, SD = 18.4)。加权合并患病率为口干症5% (95% CI: 4-6%),粘膜炎/口炎3% (95% CI: 3-4%),吞咽困难3% (95% CI: 1-2%),口咽/口腔疼痛3% (95% CI: 2-4%),口腔念珠菌病2% (95% CI: 1-3%),角性口唇炎2% (95% CI: 0-4%)。基于ICI药物的亚组差异很小。没有试验报告类地衣或类天疱疮粘膜反应。荟萃分析结果显示,静脉注射药物口服毒性发生率较低;然而,数据报告是有限的和不一致的。研究数据集的局限性表明,迫切需要系统地收集口腔发病率数据,并提高ClinicalTrials.gov上报告结果的一致性和依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Lefitolimod in Combination with Ipilimumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Trial. Safety and Efficacy of Toripalimab in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma: An Open-Label, Phase 1 Study. Selinexor (KPT-330) in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Uveal Melanoma: A Phase 1B Trial. Expert Clinical Management of Inflammatory Immune-Related Arthritis in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Usefulness of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Clinical Decision-Making in Oncology: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1