Comparison of Writing Patterns of Prescription in Public and Private Sector Hospitals in Multan

Esculapio Pub Date : 2023-05-13 DOI:10.51273/esc23.251915
Noaman Ishaq, Salman Ahmed Malik, Shahzad Gul, Ali Ahmad, Wajeeha Batool, Hannah Pirzada
{"title":"Comparison of Writing Patterns of Prescription in Public and Private Sector Hospitals in Multan","authors":"Noaman Ishaq, Salman Ahmed Malik, Shahzad Gul, Ali Ahmad, Wajeeha Batool, Hannah Pirzada","doi":"10.51273/esc23.251915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare and evaluate handwritten prescriptions from the public and private sector hospitals/clinics and to determine whether there is any significant difference between the two. Study Design: Hospital based cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Nishtar Medical University for a period of 3 months post-approval (June 2022-August 2022) Materials and Methods: Total 400 prescriptions were part of this study with 200 from private and 200 public hospital. They were collected and assessed under the World Health Organisation’s Guide to Good Prescribing. The prescriptions from one sector were then compared against those from the other sector to identify any significant differences. Results: All prescriptions lacked at least some of the criteria of a good prescription with prescriptions from the private sector being better than those from the public sector. Prescriptions from both sectors were almost completely deficient as regards to the use of generic drug names. There was negligible difference between both sectors in terms of legibility of written prescriptions (p=0.057). While name of patient, his/her age, address, vitals, drug strength, dosage, and total quantity of drug prescribed are were compared, there were significant differences of 0.032, 0.021, 0.039, 0.048, 0.041, 0.033, and 0.039 respectively. Conclusion: The private sector executes better than the public sector in prescription writing, but both sectors so far have fall short of the standards set by the World Health Organisation","PeriodicalId":11923,"journal":{"name":"Esculapio","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esculapio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51273/esc23.251915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare and evaluate handwritten prescriptions from the public and private sector hospitals/clinics and to determine whether there is any significant difference between the two. Study Design: Hospital based cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Nishtar Medical University for a period of 3 months post-approval (June 2022-August 2022) Materials and Methods: Total 400 prescriptions were part of this study with 200 from private and 200 public hospital. They were collected and assessed under the World Health Organisation’s Guide to Good Prescribing. The prescriptions from one sector were then compared against those from the other sector to identify any significant differences. Results: All prescriptions lacked at least some of the criteria of a good prescription with prescriptions from the private sector being better than those from the public sector. Prescriptions from both sectors were almost completely deficient as regards to the use of generic drug names. There was negligible difference between both sectors in terms of legibility of written prescriptions (p=0.057). While name of patient, his/her age, address, vitals, drug strength, dosage, and total quantity of drug prescribed are were compared, there were significant differences of 0.032, 0.021, 0.039, 0.048, 0.041, 0.033, and 0.039 respectively. Conclusion: The private sector executes better than the public sector in prescription writing, but both sectors so far have fall short of the standards set by the World Health Organisation
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
木尔坦地区公立医院与民营医院处方书写模式比较
目的:比较和评价公立和私营医院/诊所的手写处方,并确定两者之间是否存在显著差异。研究设计:基于医院的横断面研究。研究地点和时间:研究在批准后3个月(2022年6月至2022年8月)在Nishtar医科大学药理学和治疗学系进行。材料和方法:共400张处方是本研究的一部分,其中200张来自私立医院,200张来自公立医院。它们是根据世界卫生组织的《良好处方指南》收集和评估的。然后将来自一个部门的处方与来自另一个部门的处方进行比较,以确定任何显著差异。结果:所有处方至少缺乏部分好处方标准,私营部门处方优于公共部门处方。这两个部门的处方在使用非专利药品名称方面几乎完全缺乏。两个部门在书面处方的易读性方面差异可忽略不计(p=0.057)。比较患者姓名、年龄、住址、生命体征、药物强度、剂量、处方总药量,差异有统计学意义,分别为0.032、0.021、0.039、0.048、0.041、0.033、0.039。结论:私营部门在处方撰写方面比公共部门执行得更好,但到目前为止,这两个部门都没有达到世界卫生组织设定的标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Morphometric Measurement of Distance of Nutrient Foramen from Proximal, Distal Ends and Circumferential Diameter at the level of Nutrient Foramen in dry adult Humerii Assessment of Oral Health and Oral Hygiene Practices of Transgender Community in Lahore Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Towards Usage of Sunscreen and Prevention of Skin CancerAmong Doctors of a Tertiary Care Hospital: ACross-Sectional Study Measurement of Harris Hip Scoring During Early post-operative Period in Intertrochanteric Fractures FemurTreated with Dynamic Hip Screw Medical Negligence orMalpractice: Critical Review of Relevant Laws in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1