SQL and NoSQL Database Software Architecture Performance Analysis and Assessments—A Systematic Literature Review

IF 3.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Big Data and Cognitive Computing Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI:10.3390/bdcc7020097
Wisal Khan, Teerath Kumar, Cheng Zhang, Kislay Raj, Arunabha M. Roy, Bin Luo
{"title":"SQL and NoSQL Database Software Architecture Performance Analysis and Assessments—A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Wisal Khan, Teerath Kumar, Cheng Zhang, Kislay Raj, Arunabha M. Roy, Bin Luo","doi":"10.3390/bdcc7020097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The competent software architecture plays a crucial role in the difficult task of big data processing for SQL and NoSQL databases. SQL databases were created to organize data and allow for horizontal expansion. NoSQL databases, on the other hand, support horizontal scalability and can efficiently process large amounts of unstructured data. Organizational needs determine which paradigm is appropriate, yet selecting the best option is not always easy. Differences in database design are what set SQL and NoSQL databases apart. Each NoSQL database type also consistently employs a mixed-model approach. Therefore, it is challenging for cloud users to transfer their data among different cloud storage services (CSPs). There are several different paradigms being monitored by the various cloud platforms (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and DBaaS). The purpose of this SLR is to examine the articles that address cloud data portability and interoperability, as well as the software architectures of SQL and NoSQL databases. Numerous studies comparing the capabilities of SQL and NoSQL of databases, particularly Oracle RDBMS and NoSQL Document Database (MongoDB), in terms of scale, performance, availability, consistency, and sharding, were presented as part of the state of the art. Research indicates that NoSQL databases, with their specifically tailored structures, may be the best option for big data analytics, while SQL databases are best suited for online transaction processing (OLTP) purposes.","PeriodicalId":36397,"journal":{"name":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The competent software architecture plays a crucial role in the difficult task of big data processing for SQL and NoSQL databases. SQL databases were created to organize data and allow for horizontal expansion. NoSQL databases, on the other hand, support horizontal scalability and can efficiently process large amounts of unstructured data. Organizational needs determine which paradigm is appropriate, yet selecting the best option is not always easy. Differences in database design are what set SQL and NoSQL databases apart. Each NoSQL database type also consistently employs a mixed-model approach. Therefore, it is challenging for cloud users to transfer their data among different cloud storage services (CSPs). There are several different paradigms being monitored by the various cloud platforms (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and DBaaS). The purpose of this SLR is to examine the articles that address cloud data portability and interoperability, as well as the software architectures of SQL and NoSQL databases. Numerous studies comparing the capabilities of SQL and NoSQL of databases, particularly Oracle RDBMS and NoSQL Document Database (MongoDB), in terms of scale, performance, availability, consistency, and sharding, were presented as part of the state of the art. Research indicates that NoSQL databases, with their specifically tailored structures, may be the best option for big data analytics, while SQL databases are best suited for online transaction processing (OLTP) purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SQL和NoSQL数据库软件架构性能分析与评估——系统文献综述
在SQL和NoSQL数据库处理大数据的艰巨任务中,良好的软件体系结构起着至关重要的作用。创建SQL数据库是为了组织数据并允许水平扩展。另一方面,NoSQL数据库支持水平可伸缩性,可以有效地处理大量非结构化数据。组织需要决定哪一种范式是合适的,但是选择最佳选项并不总是那么容易。数据库设计上的差异是SQL和NoSQL数据库的区别所在。每种NoSQL数据库类型也始终采用混合模型方法。因此,云用户在不同的云存储服务(csp)之间传输数据具有挑战性。各种云平台(IaaS、PaaS、SaaS和DBaaS)正在监视几种不同的范式。本SLR的目的是研究有关云数据可移植性和互操作性以及SQL和NoSQL数据库的软件体系结构的文章。在规模、性能、可用性、一致性和分片方面,对数据库(特别是Oracle RDBMS和NoSQL文档数据库(MongoDB))的SQL和NoSQL的能力进行了大量的比较研究。研究表明,具有专门定制结构的NoSQL数据库可能是大数据分析的最佳选择,而SQL数据库最适合在线事务处理(OLTP)目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Big Data and Cognitive Computing Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Survey of Incremental Deep Learning for Defect Detection in Manufacturing BNMI-DINA: A Bayesian Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Enhanced Personalized Learning Semantic Similarity of Common Verbal Expressions in Older Adults through a Pre-Trained Model Knowledge-Based and Generative-AI-Driven Pedagogical Conversational Agents: A Comparative Study of Grice’s Cooperative Principles and Trust Distributed Bayesian Inference for Large-Scale IoT Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1