Numerical Modelling of Thermoacoustic Stirling Engines & Refrigerators

Holly Butson
{"title":"Numerical Modelling of Thermoacoustic Stirling Engines & Refrigerators","authors":"Holly Butson","doi":"10.24135/rangahau-aranga.v2i3.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thermoacoustic machines depend on the complex relationship between thermodynamics and acoustics, and thus understanding it is vital in order to analyse the working principles and optimise parameters (i.e. geometrical or operational) to improve their performance. This paper investigates how numerical modelling can be used to explore this relationship and compares the accuracy of the performance predictions for different numerical simulation software. The software used included one designed for modelling Stirling machines called ‘Sage’ and one designed for modelling thermoacoustic machines called ‘DeltaEC’. To compare their results a model of both a thermoacoustic Stirling engine and refrigerator were developed from existing models in published papers, which contained experimental data to validate the numerical models. The results from the thermoacoustic Stirling engine model show that there is good agreement between the predictions from DeltaEC and the experimental data, as well as relatively good agreement between the Sage and DeltaEC predictions. However, due to Sage requiring a different approach to model the boundary conditions for the standing wave type machine (i.e. one end closed) the predictions varied slightly from those by DeltaEC. The results from the thermoacoustic Stirling refrigerator model, however, show improved agreement between the predictions from Sage and DeltaEC – potentially due to Sage and DeltaEC using a similar approach to model the boundary conditions for the travelling wave type (i.e. two open ends). Overall, it was found that although both can accurately model travelling wave thermoacoustic machines, the nature of Sage’s solving method makes it more complex to model the standing wave type compared to DeltaEC. A discussion on the use of numerical models as a tool for better understanding thermoacoustic machines, and the importance of the accuracy of the results to allow for optimisation and improvement in their design is presented.","PeriodicalId":491085,"journal":{"name":"Rangahau Aranga AUT Graduate Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangahau Aranga AUT Graduate Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/rangahau-aranga.v2i3.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermoacoustic machines depend on the complex relationship between thermodynamics and acoustics, and thus understanding it is vital in order to analyse the working principles and optimise parameters (i.e. geometrical or operational) to improve their performance. This paper investigates how numerical modelling can be used to explore this relationship and compares the accuracy of the performance predictions for different numerical simulation software. The software used included one designed for modelling Stirling machines called ‘Sage’ and one designed for modelling thermoacoustic machines called ‘DeltaEC’. To compare their results a model of both a thermoacoustic Stirling engine and refrigerator were developed from existing models in published papers, which contained experimental data to validate the numerical models. The results from the thermoacoustic Stirling engine model show that there is good agreement between the predictions from DeltaEC and the experimental data, as well as relatively good agreement between the Sage and DeltaEC predictions. However, due to Sage requiring a different approach to model the boundary conditions for the standing wave type machine (i.e. one end closed) the predictions varied slightly from those by DeltaEC. The results from the thermoacoustic Stirling refrigerator model, however, show improved agreement between the predictions from Sage and DeltaEC – potentially due to Sage and DeltaEC using a similar approach to model the boundary conditions for the travelling wave type (i.e. two open ends). Overall, it was found that although both can accurately model travelling wave thermoacoustic machines, the nature of Sage’s solving method makes it more complex to model the standing wave type compared to DeltaEC. A discussion on the use of numerical models as a tool for better understanding thermoacoustic machines, and the importance of the accuracy of the results to allow for optimisation and improvement in their design is presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热声斯特林发动机数值模拟研究冰箱
热声机器依赖于热力学和声学之间的复杂关系,因此理解它对于分析工作原理和优化参数(即几何或操作)以提高其性能至关重要。本文研究了如何使用数值模拟来探索这种关系,并比较了不同数值模拟软件性能预测的准确性。所使用的软件包括一个为斯特林机器建模而设计的名为“Sage”的软件和一个为热声机器建模而设计的名为“DeltaEC”的软件。为了比较他们的结果,我们在已有的论文模型的基础上建立了一个热声斯特林发动机和制冷机的模型,其中包含了验证数值模型的实验数据。热声斯特林发动机模型的结果表明,DeltaEC模型的预测结果与实验数据吻合较好,Sage模型与DeltaEC模型的预测结果吻合较好。然而,由于Sage需要一种不同的方法来模拟驻波型机器的边界条件(即一端关闭),其预测与DeltaEC的预测略有不同。然而,热声斯特林制冷机模型的结果显示,Sage和DeltaEC的预测之间的一致性得到了改善,这可能是由于Sage和DeltaEC使用了类似的方法来模拟行波类型(即两个开放端点)的边界条件。总的来说,研究发现,尽管两者都可以准确地模拟行波热声机器,但Sage的求解方法的性质使得与DeltaEC相比,驻波类型的建模更加复杂。讨论了使用数值模型作为更好地理解热声机器的工具,以及结果的准确性对于优化和改进其设计的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Untitled Grief: An Application of Heuristic Inquiry Trauma to Tyranny: Autobiographical Narrative as Empathetic Design Digital Entanglement: Thinking With and About Digital Artifacts Exploring Social Connectedness and its Impact on University Adjustment and Well-being: A Mixed-Methods Study in New Zealand Predicting Rainfall-Induced Landslides in Muriwai, Auckland: A Comprehensive Multi-Model Approach for Enhanced Risk Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1