The use of a novel assessment protocol for the knee joint velocity proprioceptive sense to investigate motor learning abilities

Anthi Kellari, Eumorphia Papapostolou, Euaggelia Papadimou, Zacharias Dimitriadis, Eleni Kapreli, George Koumantakis, Nikolaos Strimpakos, Asimakis Kanellopoulos
{"title":"The use of a novel assessment protocol for the knee joint velocity proprioceptive sense to investigate motor learning abilities","authors":"Anthi Kellari, Eumorphia Papapostolou, Euaggelia Papadimou, Zacharias Dimitriadis, Eleni Kapreli, George Koumantakis, Nikolaos Strimpakos, Asimakis Kanellopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proprioception is a significant factor in balance, coordination, joint stability and movement acuity (1). Among proprioception’s components, joint position sense (JPS) and movement detection have been mostly assessed whereas little is known about the joint velocity proprioceptive sense (2). Finding the joint angular velocity(-ies) that is more comprehensible by the human’s brain, and therefore more accurately reproduced, could be used, among others, in motor learning rehabilitation protocols. To investigate the knee angular velocities envelope inside which the joint can be moved with the most accuracy, depending on the task. 48 subjects (23 men and 25 women) without knee pathology participated in the study (age 21.4 ±3.85). Velocity replication (VR) was assessed in a spectrum of 5 different and randomly chosen low velocities (2°/s, 5°/s, 10°/s, 20°/s and 30°/s) by using concentric quadriceps contraction in an Isokinetic Dynamometer (Biodex System3 Pro). During the procedure the subjects were blindfolded, and the examiners were blind regarding the results.The passive demonstrations of each joint angular velocity were followed by active velocity replications. The number of passive demonstrations and active replications were adapted for each velocity in such a way, that each subject would stay almost the same amount of time, and therefore having the same effect or effort, in all of them. The knee angular velocities of 2°/s and 5°/s had the bigger mean percentage replication errors (68.2% and 29.0%) but the smallest mean errors in absolute value (1.4°/s for both the velocities). In the velocities of 10°/s, 20°/s and 30°/s the mean percentage replication errors were 26.3%, 26.1% and 29.0% respectively, while the mean errors in absolute value were 2.6°/s, 5.5°/s and 8.6°/s respectively. According to the present research, the knee joint can achieve a maximal precision of 1.4°/s angular velocity error, appear in joint velocities below 5°/s. Rehabilitation protocols require precision should focus is this kinematic envelope as, above this threshold, the angular velocity error increases gradually, as the joint velocity increases. For gross motor activities, where percentage joint angular velocity errors are more meaningful than the absolute error values, the kinematic envelope between 10°/s - 20°/s seem to be the ideal for motor learning tasks. According to our knowledge, this is the first attempt in the literature to investigate the knee angular velocity proprioception, and further investigation is needed on the velocity proprioceptive behavior of other joints, as well as any deviations in pathologies or trauma.","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proprioception is a significant factor in balance, coordination, joint stability and movement acuity (1). Among proprioception’s components, joint position sense (JPS) and movement detection have been mostly assessed whereas little is known about the joint velocity proprioceptive sense (2). Finding the joint angular velocity(-ies) that is more comprehensible by the human’s brain, and therefore more accurately reproduced, could be used, among others, in motor learning rehabilitation protocols. To investigate the knee angular velocities envelope inside which the joint can be moved with the most accuracy, depending on the task. 48 subjects (23 men and 25 women) without knee pathology participated in the study (age 21.4 ±3.85). Velocity replication (VR) was assessed in a spectrum of 5 different and randomly chosen low velocities (2°/s, 5°/s, 10°/s, 20°/s and 30°/s) by using concentric quadriceps contraction in an Isokinetic Dynamometer (Biodex System3 Pro). During the procedure the subjects were blindfolded, and the examiners were blind regarding the results.The passive demonstrations of each joint angular velocity were followed by active velocity replications. The number of passive demonstrations and active replications were adapted for each velocity in such a way, that each subject would stay almost the same amount of time, and therefore having the same effect or effort, in all of them. The knee angular velocities of 2°/s and 5°/s had the bigger mean percentage replication errors (68.2% and 29.0%) but the smallest mean errors in absolute value (1.4°/s for both the velocities). In the velocities of 10°/s, 20°/s and 30°/s the mean percentage replication errors were 26.3%, 26.1% and 29.0% respectively, while the mean errors in absolute value were 2.6°/s, 5.5°/s and 8.6°/s respectively. According to the present research, the knee joint can achieve a maximal precision of 1.4°/s angular velocity error, appear in joint velocities below 5°/s. Rehabilitation protocols require precision should focus is this kinematic envelope as, above this threshold, the angular velocity error increases gradually, as the joint velocity increases. For gross motor activities, where percentage joint angular velocity errors are more meaningful than the absolute error values, the kinematic envelope between 10°/s - 20°/s seem to be the ideal for motor learning tasks. According to our knowledge, this is the first attempt in the literature to investigate the knee angular velocity proprioception, and further investigation is needed on the velocity proprioceptive behavior of other joints, as well as any deviations in pathologies or trauma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用一种新的评估方案膝关节速度本体感觉来调查运动学习能力
本体感觉是平衡、协调、关节稳定性和运动灵敏度的重要因素(1)。在本体感觉的组成部分中,关节位置感(JPS)和运动检测被评估得最多,而对关节速度本体感觉知之甚少(2)。寻找更容易被人脑理解的关节角速度(-ies),因此更准确地再现,可以用于运动学习康复方案等。为了研究膝关节角速度包络,其中关节可以最准确地移动,这取决于任务。48名无膝关节病理的受试者(男23名,女25名)参加了研究(年龄21.4±3.85岁)。在等速动力测力仪(Biodex System3 Pro)中,利用股四头肌同心收缩,在5种不同且随机选择的低速(2°/s、5°/s、10°/s、20°/s和30°/s)谱中评估速度复制(VR)。在测试过程中,受试者被蒙住眼睛,考官对测试结果一无所知。每个关节角速度的被动演示之后是主动速度复制。被动演示和主动复制的数量以这样一种方式适应每种速度,即每个受试者将保持几乎相同的时间,因此在所有过程中具有相同的效果或努力。膝关节角速度为2°/s和5°/s时,平均百分比复制误差较大(68.2%和29.0%),但绝对值平均误差最小(1.4°/s)。在10°/s、20°/s和30°/s速度下,复制误差的平均百分比分别为26.3%、26.1%和29.0%,绝对值的平均误差分别为2.6°/s、5.5°/s和8.6°/s。根据目前的研究,膝关节可以实现最大精度1.4°/s的角速度误差,出现在关节速度低于5°/s时。康复方案要求的精度应该集中在这个运动包络线上,因为在这个阈值以上,角速度误差随着关节速度的增加而逐渐增加。对于大运动活动,关节角速度误差百分比比绝对误差值更有意义,运动包络在10°/s - 20°/s之间似乎是运动学习任务的理想选择。据我们所知,这是文献中首次尝试研究膝关节角速度本体感觉,其他关节的速度本体感觉行为,以及病理或创伤的偏差,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of medial longitudinal arch flexibility on lower limb joint coupling coordination and gait impulse. Mechanisms of gait speed changes in middle-aged adults: Simultaneous analysis of magnitude and temporal effects. The effects of cognitive-motor interference on walking performance in adolescents with low balance. How reliable are femoropelvic kinematics during deep squats? The influence of subject-specific skeletal modelling on measurement variability. Proprioceptive-perception threshold is impaired in cerebral palsy and is associated with worse balance performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1