{"title":"Investigation of the relationship between measurement of scapular asymmetry and working posture in dentists","authors":"Merve Keskin, Derya Ozer Kaya","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dentists are at risk due to adverse conditions they are exposed to, such as improper working posture, repetitive movements, long-term static positions, excessive effort with frequent use of small muscles, tight grip of materials, using vibrating instruments, and holding their arms high for long periods of time (1). Does the scapular asymmetry distance increase as the working posture of dentists worsens? In the study, 122 volunteers (52 males, 70 females, age: 25.94±3.40 years) from dentists who have been active in the clinic for at least 6 months were included. The Lateral Scapular Slide Test was used to measure scapular asymmetry. Measurement was performed in 4 positions: in a neutral position of the glenohumeral joint with arms at both sides in a free-standing position, shoulders at 45° abduction and 90° abduction (2), and the arms were in 90° abduction holding 2.3 kg (5 lb) for those with a body weight of 68.1 kg and above, and 1.4 kg (3 lb) for those with a body weight of less than 68.1 kg. The distance between the inferior end of the scapula and the spinous process of the nearest thoracic vertebra was measured in all four positions. Working posture was evaluated during the study by observation with the REBA whole-body assessment method. The risk levels of the scoring results were made according to the REBA method; 1 point was classified as “negligible, 2-3 points as “low”, 4-7 points as “moderate”, 8-10 as “high” and 11-15 as “very high” (3,4). According to the REBA score risk classification, 36.1% of the participants were included between 4-7 “medium risk”, 56.6% 8-10 “high risk”, and 7.4% 11-15 “very high risk” group. The mean REBA score was found to be 6.48±0.73 in the intermediate-risk group, 8.72±0.73 in the high-risk group, and 11.00±0.00 in the very high-risk group. A positive correlation was found between the REBA score and dominant side lateral scapular slide test with neutral, 45°, 90° and weights (r=0.325, p<0.001; r=0.268, p=0.003; r=0.267, p=0.003; r=0.265, p=0.003). In the results, it was seen that the working posture of the dentists was risky and there was no participant in the risk-free group. The scapular asymmetry distance increased as the risk in the working posture of the dentists increased. In a previous study, interns and 1-year dentists were compared for the lateral scapular slide test, and, scapular asymmetry distance was found to be higher in 1-year dentists. (5). It has been observed that the exposure may increase as the exposure to the working posture increases. Risky postures may be related to scapular asymmetry those may further develop dysfunctions.","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dentists are at risk due to adverse conditions they are exposed to, such as improper working posture, repetitive movements, long-term static positions, excessive effort with frequent use of small muscles, tight grip of materials, using vibrating instruments, and holding their arms high for long periods of time (1). Does the scapular asymmetry distance increase as the working posture of dentists worsens? In the study, 122 volunteers (52 males, 70 females, age: 25.94±3.40 years) from dentists who have been active in the clinic for at least 6 months were included. The Lateral Scapular Slide Test was used to measure scapular asymmetry. Measurement was performed in 4 positions: in a neutral position of the glenohumeral joint with arms at both sides in a free-standing position, shoulders at 45° abduction and 90° abduction (2), and the arms were in 90° abduction holding 2.3 kg (5 lb) for those with a body weight of 68.1 kg and above, and 1.4 kg (3 lb) for those with a body weight of less than 68.1 kg. The distance between the inferior end of the scapula and the spinous process of the nearest thoracic vertebra was measured in all four positions. Working posture was evaluated during the study by observation with the REBA whole-body assessment method. The risk levels of the scoring results were made according to the REBA method; 1 point was classified as “negligible, 2-3 points as “low”, 4-7 points as “moderate”, 8-10 as “high” and 11-15 as “very high” (3,4). According to the REBA score risk classification, 36.1% of the participants were included between 4-7 “medium risk”, 56.6% 8-10 “high risk”, and 7.4% 11-15 “very high risk” group. The mean REBA score was found to be 6.48±0.73 in the intermediate-risk group, 8.72±0.73 in the high-risk group, and 11.00±0.00 in the very high-risk group. A positive correlation was found between the REBA score and dominant side lateral scapular slide test with neutral, 45°, 90° and weights (r=0.325, p<0.001; r=0.268, p=0.003; r=0.267, p=0.003; r=0.265, p=0.003). In the results, it was seen that the working posture of the dentists was risky and there was no participant in the risk-free group. The scapular asymmetry distance increased as the risk in the working posture of the dentists increased. In a previous study, interns and 1-year dentists were compared for the lateral scapular slide test, and, scapular asymmetry distance was found to be higher in 1-year dentists. (5). It has been observed that the exposure may increase as the exposure to the working posture increases. Risky postures may be related to scapular asymmetry those may further develop dysfunctions.
由于牙医所处的不利环境,例如不适当的工作姿势、重复的动作、长期静止的姿势、频繁使用小肌肉的过度用力、紧握材料、使用振动仪器、长时间高举手臂等,牙医会面临风险(1)。随着牙医工作姿势的恶化,肩胛骨不对称距离是否会增加?本研究纳入了122名志愿者,其中男性52名,女性70名,年龄25.94±3.40岁,均为在临床活动至少6个月的牙医。肩胛骨外侧滑动试验用于测量肩胛骨不对称。测量采用4种体位:肩关节中立位,两侧手臂独立站立,肩膀45°外展和90°外展(2),手臂90°外展,体重在68.1 kg及以上的人保持2.3 kg (5 lb),体重在68.1 kg以下的人保持1.4 kg (3 lb)。在所有四个位置测量肩胛骨下端与最近的胸椎棘突之间的距离。采用REBA全身评估法观察研究期间的工作姿势。采用REBA法对评分结果进行风险等级评定;1分为“可忽略”,2-3分为“低”,4-7分为“中等”,8-10分为“高”,11-15分为“非常高”(3,4)。根据REBA评分风险分类,36.1%的参与者处于4-7“中等风险”组,56.6%的参与者处于8-10“高风险”组,7.4%的参与者处于11-15“非常高风险”组。中危组REBA平均评分为6.48±0.73,高危组为8.72±0.73,极高危组为11.00±0.00。REBA评分与优势侧肩胛骨外侧滑动试验中性、45°、90°和体重呈正相关(r=0.325, p<0.001;r = 0.268, p = 0.003;r = 0.267, p = 0.003;r = 0.265, p = 0.003)。结果显示,牙医的工作姿势是有风险的,无风险组没有参与者。肩胛骨不对称距离随着牙医工作姿势风险的增加而增加。在之前的研究中,我们比较了实习生和1年牙医肩胛骨外侧滑动试验,发现1年牙医肩胛骨不对称距离更高。(5).据观察,暴露量可能随着工作姿势暴露量的增加而增加。危险的姿势可能与肩胛骨不对称有关,这些不对称可能进一步发展为功能障碍。