Investigation of the knee angular velocity proprioceptive behavior as the joint velocity increases

Ioanna Katsaveli, Anthi Kellari, Zacharias Dimitriadis, Ioannis Poulis, Asimakis Kanellopoulos
{"title":"Investigation of the knee angular velocity proprioceptive behavior as the joint velocity increases","authors":"Ioanna Katsaveli, Anthi Kellari, Zacharias Dimitriadis, Ioannis Poulis, Asimakis Kanellopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proprioception plays a crucial role to coordinated movement, which is fundamental for daily activities, exercise, and sports. The proprioceptive perception of joint angular velocity sense has received little attention in terms of research, unlike joint position sense, which has been thoroughly studied (1). The present research was conducted in order to investigate the behavior of the proprioceptive ability to comprehend and reproduce low-to-medium angular velocities in the knee joint in a healthy population. The investigation of the proprioceptive behavior regarding the accuracy of the knee joint angular velocity replication, in different joint angular velocities. 43 young healthy individuals (23 men and 20 women, mean age 20.84 yrs) participated in the present research, and were measured in 5 angular joint velocities, 30o/s, 45o/s, 60o/s, 75o/s and 90o/s, and in a randomized order, by using the “Biodex System 3 pro” isokinetic dynamometer. Five passive demonstration trials were followed by five active replications. The subjects were blindfolded during the whole procedure and they were blinded to the results, as were the examiners. Only the last 3 replication attempts were used to calculate the average velocity achieved, since the first two were considered as familiarization trials. The subjects appear to have reproduced the angular velocity of 30o/s more accurately. There is a statistically significant error in the replication of the rest of the velocities, incrementally increasing as the joint angular velocity increased. The lowest angular velocity of 30o/s showed the less significant replication error, both in absolute value (6.0o/s) and as a percentage (20.0%) of the targeted velocity, while 90o/s had the biggest one (34.9o/s and 38.8%, respectively). Something noteworthy was that the majority of the volunteers tend to undershoot the target velocities. Specifically, the number of subjects that undershoot (in comparison to the sample size) were 28/43, 38/43, 40/43, 41/43 and 43/43 for 30o/s, 45o/s, 60o/s, 75o/s and 90o/s respectively. The present study showed that as the joint angular velocity increases, and the brain cannot be informed on time about the joint motion state and is forced to predict it, the replication error increases. Regarding the unknown in the literature undershooting phenomenon observed in the present study, it seems that as the joint velocity increases and cannot be predicted with accuracy, the brain, from the spectrum of the possible predicted ones, always choses to replicate it with one of those with the lower values. This phenomenon may be an interesting conservative behavior of the brain, as the high joint angular velocities seem to be related with injuries.","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proprioception plays a crucial role to coordinated movement, which is fundamental for daily activities, exercise, and sports. The proprioceptive perception of joint angular velocity sense has received little attention in terms of research, unlike joint position sense, which has been thoroughly studied (1). The present research was conducted in order to investigate the behavior of the proprioceptive ability to comprehend and reproduce low-to-medium angular velocities in the knee joint in a healthy population. The investigation of the proprioceptive behavior regarding the accuracy of the knee joint angular velocity replication, in different joint angular velocities. 43 young healthy individuals (23 men and 20 women, mean age 20.84 yrs) participated in the present research, and were measured in 5 angular joint velocities, 30o/s, 45o/s, 60o/s, 75o/s and 90o/s, and in a randomized order, by using the “Biodex System 3 pro” isokinetic dynamometer. Five passive demonstration trials were followed by five active replications. The subjects were blindfolded during the whole procedure and they were blinded to the results, as were the examiners. Only the last 3 replication attempts were used to calculate the average velocity achieved, since the first two were considered as familiarization trials. The subjects appear to have reproduced the angular velocity of 30o/s more accurately. There is a statistically significant error in the replication of the rest of the velocities, incrementally increasing as the joint angular velocity increased. The lowest angular velocity of 30o/s showed the less significant replication error, both in absolute value (6.0o/s) and as a percentage (20.0%) of the targeted velocity, while 90o/s had the biggest one (34.9o/s and 38.8%, respectively). Something noteworthy was that the majority of the volunteers tend to undershoot the target velocities. Specifically, the number of subjects that undershoot (in comparison to the sample size) were 28/43, 38/43, 40/43, 41/43 and 43/43 for 30o/s, 45o/s, 60o/s, 75o/s and 90o/s respectively. The present study showed that as the joint angular velocity increases, and the brain cannot be informed on time about the joint motion state and is forced to predict it, the replication error increases. Regarding the unknown in the literature undershooting phenomenon observed in the present study, it seems that as the joint velocity increases and cannot be predicted with accuracy, the brain, from the spectrum of the possible predicted ones, always choses to replicate it with one of those with the lower values. This phenomenon may be an interesting conservative behavior of the brain, as the high joint angular velocities seem to be related with injuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节速度增加时膝关节角速度本体感觉行为的研究
本体感觉在协调运动中起着至关重要的作用,这是日常活动、锻炼和运动的基础。关节角速度感的本体感觉在研究方面很少受到关注,而关节位置感的研究已经深入(1)。本研究旨在探讨健康人群膝关节本体感觉对中低角速度的理解和再现能力的行为。不同关节角速度下膝关节角速度复制准确性的本体感觉行为研究。采用“Biodex System 3 pro”等速测力仪随机测定43例健康青年(男23例,女20例,平均年龄20.84岁)的角关节速度,分别为300 /s、45 /s、600 /s、75 /s和90 /s。五次被动示范试验之后是五次主动重复试验。在整个过程中,受试者被蒙住眼睛,他们和考官一样对结果一无所知。只有最后3次复制尝试被用来计算平均速度,因为前两次被认为是熟悉试验。实验对象似乎更准确地再现了300度/秒的角速度。在复制其余速度时存在统计学上显著的误差,随着关节角速度的增加而逐渐增加。最小角速度为30o/s时,复制误差的绝对值(6.00 o/s)和所占目标速度的百分比(20.0%)较低,而最大角速度为90o/s,复制误差分别为34.90 o/s和38.8%。值得注意的是,大多数志愿者倾向于低于目标速度。具体来说,在30秒、45秒、60秒、75秒和90秒时,低于样本量的被试人数分别为28/43、38/43、40/43、41/43和43/43。本研究表明,随着关节角速度的增大,大脑无法及时获知关节的运动状态,被迫进行预测,复制误差增大。对于本研究中观察到的文献中未知的不瞄准现象,似乎随着关节速度的增加,并且无法准确预测,大脑在可能预测的范围内,总是选择一个较低的值来复制它。这种现象可能是大脑的一种有趣的保守行为,因为高关节角速度似乎与损伤有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: L5-S1 arthrodesis impact on spino-pelvic parameters, gait, and quality-of-life in a patient with chronic low back pain with spondylolisthesis. WITHDRAWN: Lumbar Spine Muscle Force analysis in different Arm Swing States during gait. WITHDRAWN: Multidisciplinary biomechanical evaluation of orthopedic foot surgery in cerebral palsy: A clinical case study. WITHDRAWN: Personalized clinical decision-making by evaluating the effects of a selective nerve block on cycling and gait: A clinical case study. WITHDRAWN: Predicting botulinum toxin-a injection effects on gait in a child with hemiparetic cerebral palsy: A case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1