Evaluation of knee joint reaction force for the back and front leg during the forward jump in soccer

Meroeh Mohammadi, Javad Kalantari, Ali Mohammadi, Reza Najarpour, Fatemeh Bagheri, Abolfazl Panahi, Mahdi Barnamehei, Setayesh Asadollahi, Sara Salehimojarad
{"title":"Evaluation of knee joint reaction force for the back and front leg during the forward jump in soccer","authors":"Meroeh Mohammadi, Javad Kalantari, Ali Mohammadi, Reza Najarpour, Fatemeh Bagheri, Abolfazl Panahi, Mahdi Barnamehei, Setayesh Asadollahi, Sara Salehimojarad","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries often happen during the forward jump-landings in soccer [1]. Two main parts of the forward head jump are jumping and landing. Usually, one leg locates front, and another leg locates back during jumping and landing phases [2-4]. The ground reaction force, which presents the impact loads, affects the knee joint reaction loads and can grow biomechanical stress on the anterior cruciate ligament [3,5–7]. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare knee joint reaction loads between the back and front leg during the soccer forward jump. What are the differences in knee joint reaction loads between the back and front leg during the soccer forward jump? Twenty elite soccer athletes (68.3±7.5 kg, 178±5.3 cm, 27.5±4.5 years) participated in the current study [8]. Ten Vicon motion captures (Vicon MX, Oxford, UK, 200 Hz) were used to measure the kinematics variables [6,9,10]. EMG activity in the rectus femoris, vastus lateral, vastus medial, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius medial, gastrocnemius lateral, soleus, biceps femoris, and semitendinosus was recorded by the Myon wireless EMG system [11,12]. Raw EMG signals were full-wave rectified and linear enveloped using a dual-pass fourth-order low-pass Butterworth filter at 4 Hz [13]. A musculoskeletal model with a total of 10 bodies and 92 muscles was used to estimate joint reaction loads in OpenSim [4,14,15]. The inverse kinematics, static optimization, and joint reaction analysis were used to estimate angles, muscle loads, and joint loads, respectively [16,17]. Fig. 1 presents the mean of knee joint reaction forces in anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and superior-inferior directions during the forward jumping and landing for the back and front leg. Significant differences of knee joint reaction were found between back and front leg.Download : Download high-res image (131KB)Download : Download full-size image Fig. 1: Mean of knee joint reaction forces in anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and superior-inferior directions during the forward jumping and landing for back and front leg. This study compared the knee joint reaction loads during the soccer forward jump for the back and front leg by a previously described musculoskeletal model. In general, the forces experienced at the knee joint were not of similar magnitude.","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries often happen during the forward jump-landings in soccer [1]. Two main parts of the forward head jump are jumping and landing. Usually, one leg locates front, and another leg locates back during jumping and landing phases [2-4]. The ground reaction force, which presents the impact loads, affects the knee joint reaction loads and can grow biomechanical stress on the anterior cruciate ligament [3,5–7]. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare knee joint reaction loads between the back and front leg during the soccer forward jump. What are the differences in knee joint reaction loads between the back and front leg during the soccer forward jump? Twenty elite soccer athletes (68.3±7.5 kg, 178±5.3 cm, 27.5±4.5 years) participated in the current study [8]. Ten Vicon motion captures (Vicon MX, Oxford, UK, 200 Hz) were used to measure the kinematics variables [6,9,10]. EMG activity in the rectus femoris, vastus lateral, vastus medial, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius medial, gastrocnemius lateral, soleus, biceps femoris, and semitendinosus was recorded by the Myon wireless EMG system [11,12]. Raw EMG signals were full-wave rectified and linear enveloped using a dual-pass fourth-order low-pass Butterworth filter at 4 Hz [13]. A musculoskeletal model with a total of 10 bodies and 92 muscles was used to estimate joint reaction loads in OpenSim [4,14,15]. The inverse kinematics, static optimization, and joint reaction analysis were used to estimate angles, muscle loads, and joint loads, respectively [16,17]. Fig. 1 presents the mean of knee joint reaction forces in anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and superior-inferior directions during the forward jumping and landing for the back and front leg. Significant differences of knee joint reaction were found between back and front leg.Download : Download high-res image (131KB)Download : Download full-size image Fig. 1: Mean of knee joint reaction forces in anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and superior-inferior directions during the forward jumping and landing for back and front leg. This study compared the knee joint reaction loads during the soccer forward jump for the back and front leg by a previously described musculoskeletal model. In general, the forces experienced at the knee joint were not of similar magnitude.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
足球前跳中前后腿膝关节反作用力的评价
非接触性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤常发生在足球前跳起落运动中[1]。前头跳的两个主要部分是起跳和落地。通常在起跳和落地阶段,一条腿位于前,另一条腿位于后[2-4]。地面反作用力作为冲击载荷,影响膝关节的反作用力,会增加前交叉韧带的生物力学应力[3,5 - 7]。因此,本研究的目的是比较足球向前跳时后腿和前腿之间的膝关节反应负荷。在足球向前跳时,后腿和前腿的膝关节反应负荷有什么不同?本研究共纳入20名优秀足球运动员(68.3±7.5 kg, 178±5.3 cm, 27.5±4.5岁)[8]。十个Vicon运动捕获(Vicon MX, Oxford, UK, 200 Hz)用于测量运动学变量[6,9,10]。Myon无线肌电图系统记录股直肌、股外侧肌、股内侧肌、胫骨前肌、腓肠肌内侧肌、腓肠肌外侧肌、比目鱼肌、股二头肌和半腱肌的肌电活动[11,12]。原始肌电信号经过全波整流,并使用4 Hz双通四阶低通巴特沃斯滤波器进行线性包络[13]。在OpenSim中,我们使用了一个包含10个体和92块肌肉的肌肉骨骼模型来估计关节反应负荷[4,14,15]。运动学逆解、静态优化和关节反应分析分别用于估计角度、肌肉负荷和关节负荷[16,17]。图1为后腿和前腿在向前跳跃和落地过程中,膝关节前后、中外侧、上下方向反作用力的平均值。前后腿膝关节反应差异有统计学意义。下载:下载高清图片(131KB)下载:下载全尺寸图片图1:后腿和前腿向前跳跃和落地过程中膝关节前后、中外侧、上下方向反作用力的平均值。本研究通过先前描述的肌肉骨骼模型比较了足球向前跳时膝关节对后腿和前腿的反应负荷。一般来说,在膝关节处所经历的力没有相似的大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: L5-S1 arthrodesis impact on spino-pelvic parameters, gait, and quality-of-life in a patient with chronic low back pain with spondylolisthesis. WITHDRAWN: Lumbar Spine Muscle Force analysis in different Arm Swing States during gait. WITHDRAWN: Multidisciplinary biomechanical evaluation of orthopedic foot surgery in cerebral palsy: A clinical case study. WITHDRAWN: Personalized clinical decision-making by evaluating the effects of a selective nerve block on cycling and gait: A clinical case study. WITHDRAWN: Predicting botulinum toxin-a injection effects on gait in a child with hemiparetic cerebral palsy: A case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1