Association between the occurrence of falls and winning and losing in the final tournament of wheelchair basketball at Paralympic games

Rami Mizuta, Noriaki Maeda, Junpei Sasadai, Reia Shimizu, Akira Suzuki, Makoto Komiya, Kazuki Fukui, Tsubasa Tashiro, Shogo Tsutsumi, Yukio Urabe
{"title":"Association between the occurrence of falls and winning and losing in the final tournament of wheelchair basketball at Paralympic games","authors":"Rami Mizuta, Noriaki Maeda, Junpei Sasadai, Reia Shimizu, Akira Suzuki, Makoto Komiya, Kazuki Fukui, Tsubasa Tashiro, Shogo Tsutsumi, Yukio Urabe","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Falls occur frequently in wheelchair basketball games [1]. A fall during a game not only increases the risk of injury but can also delay the player's participation in the next play, which will affect the outcome of the game. This study aimed to explore the relationship between falls and winning or losing in wheelchair basketball games, and to clarify the importance of fall prevention. Is there a relationship between the number or the situation of falls occurring in wheelchair basketball competitions and the winning/losing of games? This study was a cross-sectional video analysis study. We watched official match videos of the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic wheelchair basketball final tournament and analyzed the occurrence of falls in a total of 20 games [2]. The analysis items included the number of falls, the classification of the faller, playing time when falling, playing phase, contact with another player, foul judgement, location of the fall, shooting motion, ball retention, and time passing after a fall. Then, we classified the falls into two groups: falls that occurred in the winning team and the losing team. The number of falls was compared between the winning and losing teams, and the analysis items were compared between the groups using chi-square tests and cross-tabulation tables. The significance level was set at 0.05. Table 1 showed the results of the comparison of fall situation characteristics in winning teams and losing teams. A total of 326 falls were observed, of which 138 occurred on the winning teams and 188 on the losing teams. There was a significant difference between winning and losing teams in the classification of fallers (p=0.005). Also, a significant difference was found in the playing time of the game when falls occurred (p=0.024). There were no significant differences between the winning and losing teams in the other items related to fall situation. This study is the first report to clarify the relationship between the occurrence of falls in wheelchair basketball and the winning and losing of a game. Falls of 4-4.5 players, with relatively good trunk control [3], occurred twice as often in the losing team as in the winning team. Then, the number of falls of the losing team increased in the latter half of the game. The occurrence of many falls in the losing team may be related to their lack of chair work skills in the 4-4.5 classification to avoid falls, and physical factors such as fatigue. While falls need to be prevented in all players and situations, this study indicated the need to address fall prevention to win games, especially in the 4-4.5 classification and in the latter half of the game.","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Falls occur frequently in wheelchair basketball games [1]. A fall during a game not only increases the risk of injury but can also delay the player's participation in the next play, which will affect the outcome of the game. This study aimed to explore the relationship between falls and winning or losing in wheelchair basketball games, and to clarify the importance of fall prevention. Is there a relationship between the number or the situation of falls occurring in wheelchair basketball competitions and the winning/losing of games? This study was a cross-sectional video analysis study. We watched official match videos of the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic wheelchair basketball final tournament and analyzed the occurrence of falls in a total of 20 games [2]. The analysis items included the number of falls, the classification of the faller, playing time when falling, playing phase, contact with another player, foul judgement, location of the fall, shooting motion, ball retention, and time passing after a fall. Then, we classified the falls into two groups: falls that occurred in the winning team and the losing team. The number of falls was compared between the winning and losing teams, and the analysis items were compared between the groups using chi-square tests and cross-tabulation tables. The significance level was set at 0.05. Table 1 showed the results of the comparison of fall situation characteristics in winning teams and losing teams. A total of 326 falls were observed, of which 138 occurred on the winning teams and 188 on the losing teams. There was a significant difference between winning and losing teams in the classification of fallers (p=0.005). Also, a significant difference was found in the playing time of the game when falls occurred (p=0.024). There were no significant differences between the winning and losing teams in the other items related to fall situation. This study is the first report to clarify the relationship between the occurrence of falls in wheelchair basketball and the winning and losing of a game. Falls of 4-4.5 players, with relatively good trunk control [3], occurred twice as often in the losing team as in the winning team. Then, the number of falls of the losing team increased in the latter half of the game. The occurrence of many falls in the losing team may be related to their lack of chair work skills in the 4-4.5 classification to avoid falls, and physical factors such as fatigue. While falls need to be prevented in all players and situations, this study indicated the need to address fall prevention to win games, especially in the 4-4.5 classification and in the latter half of the game.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾人奥运会轮椅篮球决赛中摔倒与输赢的关系
在轮椅篮球比赛中经常发生跌倒事件[1]。在比赛中摔倒不仅会增加受伤的风险,还会延迟球员参加下一场比赛,这将影响比赛的结果。本研究旨在探讨轮椅篮球比赛中跌倒与输赢的关系,并阐明预防跌倒的重要性。在轮椅篮球比赛中跌倒的次数或情况与比赛的输赢是否有关系?本研究为横断面视频分析研究。我们观看了2020年东京残奥会轮椅篮球决赛的官方比赛视频,分析了共20场比赛中摔倒的发生情况[2]。分析项目包括摔倒次数、摔倒者的分类、摔倒时的上场时间、比赛阶段、与另一名球员的接触、犯规判断、摔倒位置、投篮动作、持球、摔倒后的时间。然后,我们将跌倒分为两组:发生在胜利队和失败队的跌倒。通过卡方检验和交叉表对各组之间的分析项目进行比较,比较输赢两队之间的跌倒次数。显著性水平设为0.05。表1为胜队与败队摔倒态势特征比较结果。总共观察到326次跌倒,其中138次发生在获胜队,188次发生在失败队。输赢两队在落者分类上存在显著差异(p=0.005)。此外,发生跌倒时的游戏时间也存在显著差异(p=0.024)。在与跌倒情况相关的其他项目中,输赢两队之间没有显著差异。本研究首次阐明了轮椅篮球中摔倒的发生与比赛输赢之间的关系。4-4.5名躯干控制相对较好的队员[3]摔倒在输球队中的发生频率是输球队的两倍。然后,在比赛的后半段,败方摔倒的次数有所增加。输球队多次摔倒的发生,可能与他们缺乏4-4.5级避免摔倒的椅工技能,以及疲劳等生理因素有关。虽然在所有球员和情况下都需要防止跌倒,但这项研究表明,需要解决预防跌倒的问题以赢得比赛,特别是在4-4.5级和比赛的后半段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: L5-S1 arthrodesis impact on spino-pelvic parameters, gait, and quality-of-life in a patient with chronic low back pain with spondylolisthesis. WITHDRAWN: Lumbar Spine Muscle Force analysis in different Arm Swing States during gait. WITHDRAWN: Multidisciplinary biomechanical evaluation of orthopedic foot surgery in cerebral palsy: A clinical case study. WITHDRAWN: Personalized clinical decision-making by evaluating the effects of a selective nerve block on cycling and gait: A clinical case study. WITHDRAWN: Predicting botulinum toxin-a injection effects on gait in a child with hemiparetic cerebral palsy: A case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1