Relationship between trunk muscle forces, static and dynamic postural malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity

Maria Saade, Ali Rteil, Rami El Rachkidi, Celine Chaaya, Elma Ayoub, Elena Jaber, Elio Mekhael, Nabil Nassim, Abir Massaad, Ayman Assi
{"title":"Relationship between trunk muscle forces, static and dynamic postural malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity","authors":"Maria Saade, Ali Rteil, Rami El Rachkidi, Celine Chaaya, Elma Ayoub, Elena Jaber, Elio Mekhael, Nabil Nassim, Abir Massaad, Ayman Assi","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with Adult spinal Deformity (ASD) are known to have a deteriorated quality of life (QOL). Severe spinal deformity can develop into postural malalignment caused by a forward shift of the trunk and head. Recent studies have shown that sagittal malalignment in patients with ASD can affect joints and segments’ kinematics during daily life activities [1,2]. On the other hand, ASD patients are known to present with muscular degeneration [3]. However, it is still unknown how trunk muscle’s weakness can affect ASD postural alignment in static position and during daily life activities. To investigate the relationship between muscle forces, radiographic parameters, joint kinematics during daily activities, and QOL scores in ASD. 25 ASD & 19 controls underwent biplanar radiographs in both standing and sitting positions with the calculation of 3D classic spinopelvic and postural alignment parameters (i.e: SVA plumbline between C7 and posterior corner of the sacrum; ODHA angle between line joining odontoid process and middle of hip axis with the vertical). Movement analysis was performed during walking, sit-to-stand, and stair ascent-descent with the calculation of 3D joint and segment kinematics. Participants filled out QOL questionnaires (SF-36 with both physical and mental components, Oswestry Disability Index ODI). The strength of the following muscle groups was measured using a hand-held dynamometer: trunk extensors, flexors, and right & left lateral flexors. ASD were divided into 2 groups based on the age-normalized strength of trunk extensors compared to controls: ASD-normal extensors and ASD-weak extensors (having strength<mean-1SD in controls). Radiographic parameters, kinematic variables, and QOL scores were compared between groups. 6 ASD had weak extensors (F=20 vs. 26 N in controls). The ASD-weak extensors patients showed a forward sagittal alignment compared to ASD-normal extensors in the standing position (ODHA=5 vs 3°, SVA =73 vs 24 mm). They had to increase their pelvic retroversion while sitting in order to maintain a horizontal gaze (sitting-pelvic tilt=41 vs 35° in ASD-normal extensors). The sagittal malalignment persisted during the different performed movements (dynamic-ODHA=16° vs 9° in ASD-normal extensors). However, ASD with normal extensors had less alterations in their radiographic and kinematic parameters. Muscle weakness was correlated to the deterioration of QOL (physical component-SF36: r=0.55; p<0.001) and decreased walking speed (r=0.44; p<0.001, Fig. 1). This pilot study showed that weak trunk extensors are associated with sagittal malalignment in standing and sitting positions, as well as during daily life activities. Weak extensors also correlate to deteriorated quality of life in ASD. Normal strength of trunk extensors seems to help ASD patients in compensating for their spinal deformity both in static and during movement. Future studies will investigate the effect of muscle strengthening on both static and dynamic alignment in ASD and their quality of life. Fig. 1: Correlation between trunk extensors strength, QOL score and walking speed.Download : Download high-res image (46KB)Download : Download full-size image","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with Adult spinal Deformity (ASD) are known to have a deteriorated quality of life (QOL). Severe spinal deformity can develop into postural malalignment caused by a forward shift of the trunk and head. Recent studies have shown that sagittal malalignment in patients with ASD can affect joints and segments’ kinematics during daily life activities [1,2]. On the other hand, ASD patients are known to present with muscular degeneration [3]. However, it is still unknown how trunk muscle’s weakness can affect ASD postural alignment in static position and during daily life activities. To investigate the relationship between muscle forces, radiographic parameters, joint kinematics during daily activities, and QOL scores in ASD. 25 ASD & 19 controls underwent biplanar radiographs in both standing and sitting positions with the calculation of 3D classic spinopelvic and postural alignment parameters (i.e: SVA plumbline between C7 and posterior corner of the sacrum; ODHA angle between line joining odontoid process and middle of hip axis with the vertical). Movement analysis was performed during walking, sit-to-stand, and stair ascent-descent with the calculation of 3D joint and segment kinematics. Participants filled out QOL questionnaires (SF-36 with both physical and mental components, Oswestry Disability Index ODI). The strength of the following muscle groups was measured using a hand-held dynamometer: trunk extensors, flexors, and right & left lateral flexors. ASD were divided into 2 groups based on the age-normalized strength of trunk extensors compared to controls: ASD-normal extensors and ASD-weak extensors (having strength
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人脊柱畸形患者躯干肌力、静态和动态体位失调的关系
已知成人脊柱畸形(ASD)患者的生活质量(QOL)恶化。严重的脊柱畸形可发展为由躯干和头部前移引起的姿势失调。最近的研究表明,ASD患者矢状面排列失调会影响日常生活活动中关节和节段的运动学[1,2]。另一方面,已知ASD患者表现为肌肉变性[3]。然而,躯干肌肉无力如何影响ASD在静态位置和日常生活活动中的姿势对齐仍然是未知的。探讨ASD患者肌肉力量、影像学参数、日常活动时关节运动学与生活质量评分之间的关系。25名ASD患者和19名对照组患者分别在站立和坐姿下接受双平面x线摄影,并计算三维经典的脊柱骨盆和体位对齐参数(即C7和骶骨后角之间的SVA垂直线;齿状突连接线与髋中轴之间的ODHA夹角(纵)。在行走、坐立和楼梯升降过程中进行运动分析,并计算三维关节和节段运动学。参与者填写生活质量问卷(SF-36,包括身体和精神部分,Oswestry残疾指数ODI)。使用手持式测力仪测量以下肌肉群的力量:躯干伸肌、屈肌和左右侧屈肌。根据与对照组相比躯干伸肌的年龄标准化强度将ASD分为两组:ASD正常伸肌组和ASD弱伸肌组(对照组强度<均值1sd)。比较两组间影像学参数、运动学变量和生活质量评分。6例ASD伸展肌弱(F=20,对照组为26)。与asd正常伸肌相比,asd弱伸肌患者在站立时呈前矢状排列(ODHA=5°vs 3°,SVA =73 mm vs 24 mm)。他们必须在坐着时增加骨盆后倾,以保持水平凝视(坐-骨盆倾斜=41°vs asd正常伸肌35°)。矢状面排列失调在不同的运动过程中持续存在(动态- odha =16°,而asd正常伸肌为9°)。然而,正常伸肌的ASD在放射学和运动学参数上的改变较小。肌无力与生活质量的恶化相关(物理成分- sf36: r=0.55;P <0.001),步行速度降低(r=0.44;p<0.001,图1)。该初步研究表明,弱躯干伸肌与站立和坐姿以及日常生活活动中的矢状位错位有关。弱伸肌也与ASD患者生活质量的恶化有关。躯干伸肌的正常力量似乎有助于ASD患者补偿他们在静态和运动时的脊柱畸形。未来的研究将探讨肌肉强化对ASD患者静态和动态对齐及其生活质量的影响。图1:躯干伸肌力量、生活质量评分与步行速度的相关性。下载:下载高分辨率图片(46KB)下载:下载全尺寸图片
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1